Primary exergy efficiency-effect of system efficiency environment to benefits of exergy savings

Abstract Improving energetic performance is a key factor in making societies more sustainable. One way to analyze energetic performance is to use methods based on the second law of thermodynamics. Exergy analysis is such a method. With exergy analysis thermodynamic losses of the studied system can be found. For a specific process decreasing the exergy losses decreases the need for exergy inputs and production costs. Exergy analysis can also be used to analyze the life cycle of a process or product, but then it is necessary to model the total production system. For this reason, it is important to have efficiency analysis methods that can simultaneously analyze the studied system or process and the surrounding environment around this system. The objective of this article is to present such a method where the whole energy chain needs not to be modeled, but still the effect of an energy improvement or change in a studied process can be analyzed with respect to the whole energy chain. This method is called PeXa and it combines exergy analysis and primary energy analysis. In this work we show that also the system environment affects the benefit of exergy savings in the system level depending what production does this exergy saving replace. A district heating (DH) network with different DH producing units having different exergy efficiencies is used to show the concept. It is shown that in some cases basic exergy analysis and PeXa will give different results assuming that the objective is to consider the primary energy effects of society. By considering this broader concept of environment in exergy analysis companies and societies can direct limited resources into investments that maximize primary exergy savings.

[1]  Antonio Valero,et al.  Structural theory and thermoeconomic diagnosis: Part I. On malfunction and dysfunction analysis , 2002 .

[2]  Enrico Sciubba,et al.  A brief Commented History of Exergy From the Beginnings to 2004 , 2007 .

[3]  José Carlos Romero,et al.  Exergy as a global energy sustainability indicator. A review of the state of the art , 2014 .

[4]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[5]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[6]  Carl-Johan Fogelholm,et al.  Energetic and environmental performance of three biomass upgrading processes integrated with a CHP plant , 2013 .

[7]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[9]  E. Sciubba.  Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of Extended Exergy Accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems , 2001 .

[10]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Cumulative exergy consumption and cumulative degree of perfection of chemical processes , 1987 .

[11]  Pekka Ahtila,et al.  Comparison of energy efficiency assessment methods: case bio-SNG process. , 2014 .

[12]  Miguel A. Lozano,et al.  Theory of the exergetic cost , 1993 .

[13]  Mei Gong,et al.  On exergy and sustainable development—Part 1: Conditions and concepts , 2001 .

[14]  Birol Kılkış,et al.  Exergetic Optimization of Generated Electric Power Split in a Heat Pump Coupled Poly-Generation System , 2007 .

[15]  Wojciech Stanek,et al.  Depletion of the non-renewable natural exergy resources as a measure of the ecological cost , 2002 .

[16]  R. Clausius.  The Mechanical Theory Of Heat , 1879 .

[17]  Rene Cornelissen,et al.  The value of the exergetic life cycle assessment besides the LCA , 2002 .