OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM – A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

SUMMARY Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common diagnosis in an emergency department. It also represents a large share of patients admitted to hospital wards. Patients with PE can be risk-stratified and discharged early from the emergency department. This results in better availability of hospital beds for other patients and a significant reduction of treatment costs for the healthcare system. This paper aims to describe the protocols used in our emergency department, with special emphasis on risk stratification, for adverse events and bleeding risk, treatment strategies, and outcomes for this type of protocol. Materials and methods This paper is a retrospective analysis of patients discharged from the emergency department in a of two-year period (2020-2021) with a low-risk pulmonary embolism. Results We have included in this study 42 patients discharged after a short-term observation from the emergency department (<24h) or short-term hospitalization; <24h). Ninety-one percent of patients were discharged with direct oral anticoagulant as a treatment for PE. We did not notice any adverse events (hemorrhage, progression of PE, or major cardiovascular issues). Conclusion In the cohort of patients with PE, early discharge and outpatient treatment was safe and effective, with lower healthcare costs and almost no adverse events for patients

[1]  C. Rezus,et al.  Prediction of bleeding events using the VTE-BLEED risk score in patients with venous thromboembolism receiving anticoagulant therapy (Review). , 2021, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[2]  M. McDonagh,et al.  Outpatient Treatment of Low‐risk Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review , 2020, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[3]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Early discharge and home treatment of patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism with the oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban: an international multicentre single-arm clinical trial. , 2019, European heart journal.

[4]  C. Baugh,et al.  Multicenter Implementation of a Novel Management Protocol Increases the Outpatient Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis. , 2018, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[5]  A. Singer,et al.  Multicenter Trial of Rivaroxaban for Early Discharge of Pulmonary Embolism From the Emergency Department (MERCURY PE): Rationale and Design. , 2016, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  K. Empen,et al.  Home treatment of patients with low-risk pulmonary embolism with the oral factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban , 2016, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[7]  A. Seger,et al.  Hospital costs of acute pulmonary embolism. , 2013, The American journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Kruip,et al.  Comparison of two methods for selection of out of hospital treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism , 2012, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  B. Hiddinga,et al.  Hestia criteria can discriminate high- from low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism , 2012, European Respiratory Journal.

[10]  A. Seger,et al.  HOSPITAL COSTS OF ACUTE PULMONARY EMBOLISM , 2012 .

[11]  O. Dekkers,et al.  Outpatient treatment in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the Hestia Study , 2011, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[12]  Lisa Moores,et al.  Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  M. Fine,et al.  Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low‐risk patients with pulmonary embolism , 2007, Journal of internal medicine.

[14]  Roslyn A Stone,et al.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. , 2005, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  S. Daeschner Pulmonary embolism. , 1988, Nursing.