Forecasting technology substitution based on hazard function

The failing to prepare for forecasting along with an excessive focus on incumbent technology may lead to failure in coping with emerging technology. This, in turn, results in entering the market late. Although identifying technology substitution in advance has become increasingly important, there have only been a few attempts to forecast technology substitution. These forecasts have only tried to explain the phenomenon of substitution by focusing on the diffusion of products. Therefore, this paper aims to suggest an approach to forecasting substitution from incumbent technology and emerging technology by applying a hazard rate that originates in equipment placement in reliability engineering. A candidate for emerging technology with a high possibility to substitute existing dominant technology is chosen first. Second, we have developed a model that includes the bathtub-curve to estimate the hazard rate for technologies. This model considers uncertainty, risk, and utility when developing technology. Based on the model, the hazard rate of the dominant technology is estimated by using patent data. After estimating the hazard rate in the form of the bathtub, inflection points and several factors will define an appropriate time point for the substitution. This proposed approach is a novel approach that applies the critical concepts in reliability engineering to technological substitution. Based on a mathematical theory, this method can be used as a decision-making tool for deciding when to develop a technology and apply for patents.

[1]  Raymond Pearl,et al.  On the Rate of Growth of the Population of the United States since 1790 and Its Mathematical Representation. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Yeu-Shiang Huang,et al.  Decisions on optimal adoption time for new technology , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Suk Joo Bae,et al.  Optimal maintenance policy of repairable system with bathtub shaped intensity , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and Safety Engineering.

[4]  Nigel Meade,et al.  The diffusion of successive generations of a technology: A more general model , 1997 .

[5]  K. S. Wang,et al.  Modeling the bathtub shape hazard rate function in terms of reliability , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  J. C. Fisher,et al.  A simple substitution model of technological change , 1971 .

[7]  Jorge Navarro,et al.  How to obtain bathtub-shaped failure rate models from normal mixtures , 2004 .

[8]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Forecasting the market diffusion of disruptive and discontinuous innovation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[9]  J. L. Guardado,et al.  A model for optimizing maintenance policy for power equipment , 2015 .

[10]  Xiaojun Zhou,et al.  Reliability-centered predictive maintenance scheduling for a continuously monitored system subject to degradation , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Larry Lee Testing Adequacy of the Weibull and Log Linear Rate Models for a Poisson Process , 1980 .

[12]  F. Bass A new product growth model for consumer durables , 1976 .

[13]  U. Doraszelski Innovations, improvements, and the optimal adoption of new technologies , 2004 .

[14]  Yoram Barzel,et al.  Optimal Timing of Innovations , 1968 .

[15]  M. E. Ghitany The monotonicity of the reliabilitymeasures of the beta distribution , 2004, Appl. Math. Lett..

[16]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[17]  D. Horsky,et al.  Advertising and the Diffusion of New Products , 1983 .

[18]  F. Bass,et al.  A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products , 1987 .

[19]  Ron Adner,et al.  Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves , 2016 .

[20]  Deo Kumar Srivastava,et al.  The exponentiated Weibull family: a reanalysis of the bus-motor-failure data , 1995 .

[21]  Elaine M. Keramidas,et al.  Forecasting Technological Substitutions with Concurrent Short Time Series , 1990 .

[22]  Peter M. Kort,et al.  Optimal timing of technology adoption , 1998 .

[23]  Min Xie,et al.  Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with bathtub-shaped failure rate function , 1996 .

[24]  Bowon Kim,et al.  Managing the transition of technology life cycle , 2003 .

[25]  Gianpaolo Pulcini,et al.  Modeling the failure data of a repairable equipment with bathtub type failure intensity , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Bathtub-shaped failure rate functions , 2009 .

[27]  H. Weil,et al.  Dynamics of Social Factors in Technological Substitutions , 2005 .

[28]  Peter A. Lachenbruch,et al.  Survival distributions arising from two families and generated by transformations , 1984 .

[29]  U. Hjorth A Reliability Distribution With Increasing, Decreasing, Constant and Bathtub-Shaped Failure Rates , 1980 .

[30]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Optimal timing of the development of innovative goods with generation — an empirical analysis focusing on Canon's printer series 1The opinions in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the official opinion of Canon Inc. 1 , 2002 .

[31]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  Timing of Innovations Under Rivalry , 1972 .