Components of motion perception revealed: two different after-effects from a single moving object

If motion that one has been looking at for some time suddenly stops, or if one shifts one's gaze to a static object, one will see motion in the opposite direction: the motion after-effect. If two transparent surfaces move with different speeds in different directions, then the direction of the motion after-effect will depend on the test pattern. For such transparent surfaces both the local motion and the global percept have two components. When looking at a normal moving object, there is only one perceived global motion. However, we know that locally there can be considerable ambiguity (the aperture problem). Does one adapt to all the local components, including those that one does not perceive, or only to the perceived global motion? We designed a stimulus that is perceived to be a fast rotating object, but also has a slow local radial component of motion. By selecting an appropriate test pattern we could either get a radial or a rotating motion after-effect. Thus we show that adaptation to motion must (also) occur at a stage at which local motions have not yet been integrated to give a unified percept.

[1]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field , 1986, Vision Research.

[2]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  A new transparent motion aftereffect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Independent Aftereffects of Attention and Motion , 2000, Neuron.

[4]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[5]  M. Hawken,et al.  Psychophysics: Threshold Measurements Interaction of Motion and Color in the Visual Pathways , 2022 .

[6]  David R Badcock,et al.  Independent speed-tuned global-motion systems , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  R. Snowden,et al.  Phantom motion aftereffects – evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow , 1997, Current Biology.

[9]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular–rivalry stages , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  S. Anstis,et al.  Separate motion aftereffects from each eye and from both eyes , 1983, Vision Research.

[11]  R. Tanzi Caspases land on APP: One small step for apoptosis, one giant leap for amyloidosis? , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Visual Motion Aftereffects: Critical Adaptation and Test Conditions , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.