Relationships between work task types, complexity and dwell time of information resources

Information seeking research often reports about types of information resources, ways of acquiring them and opinions on their importance in various professions. Based on self-reporting, these findings are affected by human memory and rationalisation. This article proposes a new way of studying information resource use – based on dwell time in the context provided by concrete work tasks. We use log data of 21 information workers from six organisations to analyse how work task complexity is connected to the time used in various information resources; how task complexity is connected to information resource use in different task types. Unlike traditionally, our findings consist of objective data on which resource types are used, and for how long, in work tasks of varying complexity and type. For example, the findings suggest that growing work task complexity increases the dwell time in local personal computer (PC) resources; these resources are especially popular in intellectual tasks. Such findings help understand factors affecting information resource use. Likewise, they help focus attention on most time-consuming aspects of task-based information interaction when developing support for work.

[1]  Douglas W. Oard,et al.  User Modeling for Information Access Based on Implicit Feedback , 2000 .

[2]  Bradley N. Miller,et al.  GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news , 1997, CACM.

[3]  Jingjing Liu User assessment of search task difficulty: Relationships between reasons and ratings , 2015 .

[4]  Robert S. Taylor Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries , 1968, Coll. Res. Libr..

[5]  Pertti Vakkari Task complexity, information types, search strategies and relevance: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval , 1999 .

[6]  A. Ibrahim,et al.  Use and User Perception of Electronic Resources in the United Arab Emirates University (UAEU) , 2004 .

[7]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Queries in authentic work tasks: the effects of task type and complexity , 2016, J. Documentation.

[8]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity and information searching in administrative tasks revisited , 2012, IIiX.

[9]  Zhizhong Li,et al.  Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework , 2012 .

[10]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Nils Pharo,et al.  A new model of information behaviour based on the Search Situation Transition schema , 2004, Inf. Res..

[15]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Barriers to task-based information access in molecular medicine , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Konstantina Martzoukou,et al.  A review of Web information seeking research: considerations of method and foci of interest , 2005, Inf. Res..

[17]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Task Effects on Interactive Search: The Query Factor , 2008, INEX.

[18]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Work tasks as units for analysis in information seeking and retrieval studies , 2002 .

[19]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Preben Hansen,et al.  Task-based Information Seeking and Retrieval in the Patent Domain: Processes and Relationships , 2011 .

[21]  Yuelin Li,et al.  Exploring the relationships between work task and search task in information search , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Dagobert Soergel,et al.  Selecting and measuring task characteristics as independent variables , 2006, ASIST.

[23]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Penelope Campbell,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior (3rd ed.) , 2013 .

[25]  Christina Courtright Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[26]  Jingjing Liu,et al.  Exploring search task difficulty reasons in different task types and user knowledge groups , 2015, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[28]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Information interaction in molecular medicine: integrated use of multiple channels , 2010, IIiX.

[29]  Sanna Kumpulainen,et al.  Expected and materialised information source use by municipal officials: intertwining with task complexity , 2014, Inf. Res..

[30]  Jesper Kallehauge,et al.  Stage-driven information seeking process: Value and uncertainty of work tasks from initiation to resolution , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Katriina Byström,et al.  Task complexity, information types and information sources : examination of relationships , 1999 .

[32]  Barbara Czarniawska Shadowing: And Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies , 2007 .

[33]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau Towards collaboration between information seeking and information retrieval , 2005 .

[34]  M. Hakel,et al.  Effects of Objective and Subjective Task Complexity on Performance , 1997 .

[35]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[36]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback , 2001, Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.

[37]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  Expertise seeking: A review , 2014, Inf. Process. Manag..

[38]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-Based Information Interaction Evaluation , 2015, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Jia Tina Du,et al.  The information journey of marketing professionals: Incorporating work task‐driven information seeking, information judgments, information use, and information sharing , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Looking for Information—A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior , 2003, Information Retrieval.

[42]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[43]  Arthur Taylor,et al.  Examination of work task and criteria choices for the relevance judgment process , 2013, J. Documentation.

[44]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies , 2014, J. Documentation.

[45]  Pia Borlund,et al.  What does time spent on searching indicate? , 2012, IIiX.

[46]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Modelling marketing professionals' information behaviour in the workplace: towards a holistic understanding , 2013, Inf. Res..

[47]  Michael A. Shepherd,et al.  Effect of task on time spent reading as an implicit measure of interest , 2005, ASIST.