Feasibility of a Wiki as a Participatory Tool for Patients in Clinical Guideline Development

Background Patient participation is essential in developing high-quality guidelines but faces practical challenges. Evidence on timing, methods, evaluations, and outcomes of methodologies for patient participation in guideline development is lacking. Objective To assess the feasibility of a wiki as a participatory tool for patients in the development of a guideline on infertility determined by (1) use of the wiki (number of page views and visitors), (2) benefits of the wiki (ie, number, content, and eligibility of the recommendations to be integrated into the guideline), and (3) patients’ facilitators of and barriers to adoption, and the potential challenges to be overcome in improving this wiki. Methods To obtain initial content for the wiki, we conducted in-depth interviews (n = 12) with infertile patients. Transcripts from the interviews were translated into 90 draft recommendations. These were presented on a wiki. Over 7 months, infertile patients were invited through advertisements or mailings to formulate new or modify existing recommendations. After modifying the recommendations, we asked patients to select their top 5 or top 3 recommendations for each of 5 sections on fertility care. Finally, the guideline development group assessed the eligibility of the final set of recommendations within the scope of the guideline. We used a multimethod evaluation strategy to assess the feasibility of the wiki as a participatory tool for patients in guideline development. Results The wiki attracted 298 unique visitors, yielding 289 recommendations. We assessed the 21 recommendations ranked as the top 5 or top 3 for their eligibility for being integrated into the clinical practice guideline. The evaluation identified some challenges needed to be met to improve the wiki tool, concerning its ease of use, website content and layout, and characteristics of the wiki tool. Conclusions The wiki is a promising and feasible participatory tool for patients in guideline development. A modified version of this tool including new modalities (eg, automatically limiting the number and length of recommendations, using a fixed format for recommendations, including a motivation page, and adding a continuous prioritization system) should be developed and evaluated in a patient-centered design.

[1]  Jeremy C Wyatt,et al.  Evaluation of ehealth systems and services , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  H Bastian,et al.  Raising the standard: practice guidelines and consumer participation. , 1996, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  A D Oxman,et al.  Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  M. Mulholland,et al.  The University of Michigan. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[5]  S. Greenfield,et al.  COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPING TRUSTWORTHY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES , 2011 .

[6]  C. Gnoth,et al.  Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[7]  France Légaré,et al.  Users' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing EHR in Canada: A study protocol , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[8]  France Légaré,et al.  Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  G D Adamson,et al.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  Alison Taylor.  Extent of the problem , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  F. Légaré,et al.  Patient and Public Involvement in Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  Mohanraj Karunanithi,et al.  Monitoring technology for the elderly patient , 2007, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  Derek L. Hansen.  Knowledge sharing, maintenance, and use in online support communities , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Sharon E Straus,et al.  WikiBuild: A New Online Collaboration Process For Multistakeholder Tool Development and Consensus Building , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (January 2001) , 2014 .

[16]  W. Rogers.  Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[18]  Alec Holt,et al.  Consumers are ready to accept the transition to online and electronic records if they can be assured of the security measures. , 2007, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[19]  James M Heilman,et al.  Wikipedia: A Key Tool for Global Public Health Promotion , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[20]  André Kushniruk,et al.  Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering , 2002, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[21]  C. Chronaki,et al.  European citizens' use of E-health services: A study of seven countries , 2007, BMC public health.

[22]  A. Oxman,et al.  Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement , 2006, Health research policy and systems.

[23]  J. Kremer,et al.  Origin of multiple pregnancies in a subfertile population , 2010, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[24]  C. Chronaki,et al.  eHealth Trends in Europe 2005-2007: A Population-Based Survey , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  Murray Krahn,et al.  The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. , 2008, JAMA.

[26]  Pierre Frémont,et al.  Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[27]  P. Archambault.  WikiBuild: A New Application to Support Patient and Health Care Professional Involvement in the Development of Patient Support Tools , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit) , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[29]  Trudy van der Weijden,et al.  Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[30]  Richard N. Shiffman,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making the Guideline Implementability Appraisal (glia): Development of an Instrument to Identify Obstacles to Guideline Implementation , 2022 .

[31]  Michael Cross,et al.  How the internet is changing health care , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  T Philip,et al.  International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  J. Blasco,et al.  A strategy for patient involvement in clinical practice guidelines: methodological approaches , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[34]  R. Nachtigall.  International disparities in access to infertility services. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  M. Campbell,et al.  What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[36]  Lara Varpio,et al.  Wiki use and challenges in undergraduate medical education , 2009, Medical education.

[37]  Lyndal Trevena,et al.  WikiProject Medicine , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  M. Lorentzon.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[39]  W. Sermeus,et al.  The patients' perspective on fertility care: a systematic review. , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[40]  M Eccles,et al.  Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[41]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[42]  M. Crawford,et al.  Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[43]  Sandra L Saperstein,et al.  Using the Internet for Health-Related Activities: Findings From a National Probability Sample , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[44]  Constance M. Johnson,et al.  Implementation of a user-centered framework in the development of a web-based health information database and call center , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[45]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Current Internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[46]  Louise Lemieux-Charles,et al.  How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[47]  S. Cotten,et al.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[48]  Dean Giustini,et al.  How Web 2.0 is changing medicine , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[49]  Jan H. Spyridakis,et al.  Guidelines for Authoring Comprehensible Web Pages and Evaluating Their Success , 2000 .

[50]  R. Casper,et al.  Use of the internet by infertile couples. , 2000, Fertility and sterility.

[51]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Electronic Health Records to Coordinate Decision Making for Complex Patients: What Can We Learn from Wiki? , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[52]  T. Wischmann.  Implications of psychosocial support in infertility – a critical appraisal , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology.

[53]  France Légaré,et al.  Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[54]  Leonie Ellis,et al.  The Role of User-Centred Design Within Online Community Development , 2011, ITCH.

[55]  Julie M. Miller.  The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) , 2002 .

[56]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies , 2010, Psychology & health.