A MatLAB Based Virtual Phantom for 2D Electrical Impedance Tomography (MatVP2DEIT): Studying the Medical Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction in Computer

Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a computerized medical imaging technique which reconstructs the electrical impedance images of a domain under test from the boundary voltage-current data measured by an EIT electronic instrumentation using an image reconstruction algorithm. Being a computed tomography technique, EIT injects a constant current to the patient's body through the surface electrodes surrounding the domain to be imaged (Omega) and tries to calculate the spatial distribution of electrical conductivity or resistivity of the closed conducting domain using the potentials developed at the domain boundary (partial derivative Omega). Practical phantoms are essentially required to study, test and calibrate a medical EIT system for certifying the system before applying it on patients for diagnostic imaging. Therefore, the EIT phantoms are essentially required to generate boundary data for studying and assessing the instrumentation and inverse solvers a in EIT. For proper assessment of an inverse solver of a 2D EIT system, a perfect 2D practical phantom is required. As the practical phantoms are the assemblies of the objects with 3D geometries, the developing of a practical 2D-phantom is a great challenge and therefore, the boundary data generated from the practical phantoms with 3D geometry are found inappropriate for assessing a 2D inverse solver. Furthermore, the boundary data errors contributed by the instrumentation are also difficult to separate from the errors developed by the 3D phantoms. Hence, the errorless boundary data are found essential to assess the inverse solver in 2D EIT. In this direction, a MatLAB-based Virtual Phantom for 2D EIT (MatVP2DEIT) is developed to generate accurate boundary data for assessing the 2D-EIT inverse solvers and the image reconstruction accuracy. MatVP2DEIT is a MatLAB-based computer program which simulates a phantom in computer and generates the boundary potential data as the outputs by using the combinations of different phantom parameters as the inputs to the program. Phantom diameter, inhomogeneity geometry (shape, size and position), number of inhomogeneities, applied current magnitude, background resistivity, inhomogeneity resistivity all are set as the phantom variables which are provided as the input parameters to the MatVP2DEIT for simulating different phantom configurations. A constant current injection is simulated at the phantom boundary with different current injection protocols and boundary potential data are calculated. Boundary data sets are generated with different phantom configurations obtained with the different combinations of the phantom variables and the resistivity images are reconstructed using EIDORS. Boundary data of the virtual phantoms, containing inhomogeneities with complex geometries, are also generated for different current injection patterns using MatVP2DEIT and the resistivity imaging is studied. The effect of regularization method on the image reconstruction is also studied with the data generated by MatVP2DEIT. Resistivity images are evaluated by studying the resistivity parameters and contrast parameters estimated from the elemental resistivity profiles of the reconstructed phantom domain. Results show that the MatVP2DEIT generates accurate boundary data for different types of single or multiple objects which are efficient and accurate enough to reconstruct the resistivity images in EIDORS. The spatial resolution studies show that, the resistivity imaging conducted with the boundary data generated by MatVP2DEIT with 2048 elements, can reconstruct two circular inhomogeneities placed with a minimum distance (boundary to boundary) of 2 mm. It is also observed that, in MatVP2DEIT with 2048 elements, the boundary data generated for a phantom with a circular inhomogeneity of a diameter less than 7% of that of the phantom domain can produce resistivity images in EIDORS with a 1968 element mesh. Results also show that the MatVP2DEIT accurately generates the boundary data for neighbouring, opposite reference and trigonometric current patterns which are very suitable for resistivity reconstruction studies. MatVP2DEIT generated data are also found suitable for studying the effect of the different regularization methods on reconstruction process. Comparing the reconstructed image with an original geometry made in MatVP2DEIT, it would be easier to study the resistivity imaging procedures as well as the inverse solver performance. Using the proposed MatVP2DEIT software with modified domains, the cross sectional anatomy of a number of body parts can be simulated in PC and the impedance image reconstruction of human anatomy can be studied.

[1]  Wei Wang,et al.  Investigation of biological phantom for 2D and 3D breast EIT images , 2007 .

[2]  David Barber,et al.  Three dimensional electrical impedance tomography of the human thorax , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Andy Adler,et al.  A Resistive Mesh Phantom for Assessing the Performance of EIT Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  A battery-based constant current source (Bb-CCS) for biomedical applications , 2013, 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT).

[5]  Shi Liu,et al.  An image reconstruction algorithm based on the extended Tikhonov regularization method for electrical capacitance tomography , 2009 .

[6]  G Hahn,et al.  Systematic errors of EIT systems determined by easily-scalable resistive phantoms , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[7]  T. Hope,et al.  Technology review: The use of electrical impedance scanning in the detection of breast cancer , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[8]  Hervé Gagnon,et al.  Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  A MATLAB-Based Boundary Data Simulator for Studying the Resistivity Reconstruction Using Neighbouring Current Pattern , 2013, Journal of medical engineering.

[10]  H Griffiths,et al.  A dual-frequency electrical impedance tomography system. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  T Schröder,et al.  A simple method to check the dynamic performance of electrical impedance tomography systems. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Bastian von Harrach,et al.  Recent Progress on the Factorization Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[13]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  A Matlab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the Electrical Impedance and Diffuse Optical Reconstruction Software project , 2002 .

[14]  E. Alexánderson,et al.  Orbital positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging findings in graves ophthalmopathy , 2012, BMC Research Notes.

[15]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  A Local Region of Interest Imaging Method for Electrical Impedance Tomography with Internal Electrodes , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[16]  Hervé Gagnon,et al.  A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[17]  Thomas J. Yorkey,et al.  Comparing reconstruction methods for electrical impedance tomography , 1987, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  D S Holder,et al.  Some practical biological phantoms for calibrating multifrequency electrical impedance tomography. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[19]  Roland N. Horne,et al.  ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY (EIT) METHOD FOR SATURATION DETERMINATION , 2006 .

[20]  Hideaki Tashima,et al.  Design study of the DOI-PET scanners with the X'tal Cubes Toward sub-millimeter spatial resolution , 2013 .

[21]  Filippo Attivissimo,et al.  A statistical approach for MR and CT images comparison , 2013 .

[22]  D S Holder,et al.  Use of polyacrylamide gels in a saline-filled tank to determine the linearity of the Sheffield Mark 1 electrical impedance tomography (EIT) system in measuring impedance disturbances. , 1994, Physiological measurement.

[23]  H Griffiths A phantom for electrical impedance tomography. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[24]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Improving Image Quality in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) Using Projection Error Propagation-Based Regularization (PEPR) Technique: A Simulation Study , 2011 .

[25]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Studies on thin film based flexible gold electrode arrays for resistivity imaging in electrical impedance tomography , 2014 .

[26]  H Griffiths,et al.  A Cole phantom for EIT. , 1995, Physiological measurement.

[27]  Yufeng Zhou Noninvasive Treatment of Breast Cancer Using High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound , 2013 .

[28]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography of cell viability in tissue with application to cryosurgery. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[29]  Cosimo Imperiale,et al.  Some fast calculations simulating measurements from single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging , 2005 .

[30]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Image Reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) with Projection Error Propagation-based Regularization (PEPR): A Practical Phantom Study , 2011, ADCONS.

[31]  David Isaacson,et al.  A Versatile High-Permittivity Phantom for EIT , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT): A Harmless Medical Imaging Modality , 2014 .

[33]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  A study of practical biological phantoms with simple instrumentation for Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) , 2009, 2009 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[34]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Improving the image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) with block matrix-based Multiple Regularization (BMMR): A practical phantom study , 2011, 2011 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies.

[35]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Improving Conductivity Image Quality Using Block Matrix-based Multiple Regularization (BMMR) Technique in EIT: A Simulation Study , 2011 .

[36]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Subsurface electrical impedance imaging: measurement strategy, image reconstruction and in vivo results. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[37]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Studying the resistivity imaging of chicken tissue phantoms with different current patterns in Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) , 2012 .

[38]  Andy Adler,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[39]  L Tarassenko,et al.  Impedance imaging in the newborn. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[40]  Philippe Renaud,et al.  Cell Culture Imaging Using Microimpedance Tomography , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  M. Saritha,et al.  Automatic Interpretation of MRI Brain Images Using Probabilistic Neural Network , 2013 .

[42]  J. Rosell,et al.  Multi-frequency static imaging in electrical impedance tomography: Part 1 instrumentation requirements , 1995, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[43]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  A FEM-Based Forward Solver for Studying the Forward Problem of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) with A Practical Biological Phantom , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference.

[44]  H Griffiths,et al.  A constant-perturbation saline phantom for electrical impedance tomography , 1989 .

[45]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Bayesian regularization-based Levenberg–Marquardt neural model combined with BFOA for improving surface finish of FDM processed part , 2012 .

[46]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  EIT-Based Fabric Pressure Sensing , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[47]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[48]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Validation of a multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (mfEIT) system KHU Mark1: impedance spectroscopy and time-difference imaging , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[49]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  A Chicken Tissue Phantom for Studying an Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) System Suitable for Clinical Imaging , 2011 .

[51]  Tushar Kanti Bera,et al.  Resistivity imaging of a reconfigurable phantom with circular inhomogeneities in 2D-electrical impedance tomography , 2011 .

[52]  D S Holder,et al.  Current approaches to analogue instrumentation design in electrical impedance tomography , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[53]  José Hinz,et al.  Regional ventilation by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with ventilation scintigraphy in pigs. , 2003, Chest.

[54]  Martin Hanke,et al.  The regularizing Levenberg-Marquardt scheme is of optimal order , 2010 .

[55]  Jochen Hiller,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the estimation of measurement uncertainties in dimensional X-ray computed tomography , 2012 .