Mimetic Machines: Collaborative Interventions in Digital Fabrication with Arc

This paper examines the collaborative process of developing Arc, a computer numerical controlled (CNC) engraving tool for ceramics that offers a new window onto traditional forms of craft. In reflecting on this case and scholarship from the social sciences, we make two contributions. First, we show that fabrication tools may integrate multiple and distinct roles (as copiers, translators and connectors) in their production of form, selectively limiting the agency of the maker and machine. Second, we situate small-scale manufacturing in a wider historical context of "mimetic machinery": machines for mechanical reproduction that draw their symbolic power from a material connection with the phenomena represented (in this case, sound and gesture). We end by sharing lessons learned for fabrication research based on this study.

[1]  Tony P. Pridmore,et al.  From codes to patterns: designing interactive decoration for tableware , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Breakdown, obsolescence and reuse: HCI and the art of repair , 2014, CHI.

[3]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Democratizing technology: pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice , 2013, CHI.

[4]  Dennis M. Murphy The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2012 .

[5]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators , 2014, CHI.

[6]  Alex Taylor,et al.  After interaction , 2015, Interactions.

[7]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  Response to Philip N. Howard's review of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom , 2011, Perspectives on Politics.

[8]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  KidCAD: digitally remixing toys through tangible tools , 2012, CHI.

[9]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters , 2009, C&C '09.

[10]  Steven J. Jackson,et al.  Digital Entanglements: Craft, Computation and Collaboration in Fine Art Furniture Production , 2015, CSCW.

[11]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Sustainable Making? Balancing Optimism and Criticism in HCI Discourse , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[12]  Morgan G. Ames Charismatic technology , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[13]  Kimiko Ryokai,et al.  Being the Machine: Reconfiguring Agency and Control in Hybrid Fabrication , 2015, CHI.

[14]  Chiara Rossitto,et al.  Understanding agency in interaction design materials , 2012, CHI.

[15]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Reimagining Digital Fabrication as Performance Art , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Printing teddy bears: a technique for 3D printing of soft interactive objects , 2014, CHI.

[17]  Austin Toombs Enacting Care Through Collaboration in Communities of Makers , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[18]  A. E. Crawley The Golden Bough , 1914, Nature.

[19]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Case studies in the personal fabrication of electronic products , 2012, DIS '12.

[20]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Plushie: an interactive design system for plush toys , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..

[22]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  FreeD: a freehand digital sculpting tool , 2013, CHI.

[23]  Faythe Levine,et al.  Handmade Nation: The Rise of DIY, Art, Craft, and Design , 2008 .

[24]  M. Taussig,et al.  Mimesis and Alterity , 2018 .

[25]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  SketchChair: an all-in-one chair design system for end users , 2011, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.