An ontology for the generalisation of the bathymetry on nautical charts

On nautical charts, undersea features are portrayed by sets of soundings (depth points) and isobaths (depth contours) from which map readers can interpret landforms. Different techniques were developed for automatic soundings selection and isobath generalisation from a sounding set. These methods are mainly used to generate a new chart from the bathymetric database or from a large scale chart through selection and simplification however a part of the process consists in selecting and emphasising undersea features on the chart according to their relevance to navigation. Its automation requires classification of the features from the set of isobaths and soundings and their generalisation through the selection and application of a set of operators according not only to geometrical constraints but also to semantic constraints. The objective of this paper is to define an ontology formalising undersea feature representation and the generalisation process achieving this representation on a nautical chart. The ontology is built in two parts addressing on one hand the definition of the features and on the other hand their generalisation. The central concept is the undersea feature around which other concepts are organised. The generalisation process is driven by the features where the objective is to select or emphasise information according to their meaning for a specific purpose. The ontologies were developed in Protege and a bathymetric database server integrating the ontology was implemented. A generalisation platform was also developed and examples of representations obtained by the platform are presented. Finally, current results and on-going research are discussed.

[1]  C. Duchêne,et al.  Towards an Ontology of Spatial Relations and Relational Constraints , 2012 .

[2]  R. Peters A Voronoi- and surface-based approach for the automatic generation of depth-contours for hydrographic charts , 2012 .

[3]  Stephanie Duce,et al.  Towards an Ontology for Reef Islands , 2009, GeoS.

[4]  Chen-Chieh Feng,et al.  Ontology‐based Qualitative Feature Analysis: Bays as a Case Study , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[5]  Eric Guilbert Multi-level representation of terrain features on a contour map , 2012, GeoInformatica.

[6]  Krzysztof Janowicz,et al.  A Geo-semantics Flyby , 2013, Reasoning Web.

[7]  Barry Smith,et al.  Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms , 2003 .

[8]  Jingya Yan,et al.  An Ontology of the Submarine Relief for Analysis and Representation on Nautical Charts , 2015 .

[9]  David M. Mark,et al.  Cognition-Based Extraction and Modelling of Topographic Eminences , 2010, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[10]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  The IGN-E Case: Integrating Through a Hidden Ontology , 2008, SDH.

[11]  Eric Guilbert,et al.  A multi-agent System Approach for Feature- driven Generalization of isobathymetric Line , 2011 .

[12]  Robert Weibel,et al.  Modelling the Overall Process of Generalisation , 2007 .

[13]  Barry Smith,et al.  A science of topography: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide , 2004 .

[14]  Frederico T. Fonseca,et al.  Ontology-driven geographic information systems , 1999, GIS '99.

[15]  Nicholas Gould,et al.  An Ontological approach to On-demand Mapping , 2016 .

[16]  Thomas Bittner,et al.  Vagueness and the trade-off between the classification and delineation of geographic regions – an ontological analysis , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Ralph K. Straumann,et al.  Experiences in Developing Landform Ontologies , 2009 .

[18]  M. Egenhofer,et al.  Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations , 2001 .

[19]  Joseph. Wood,et al.  The geomorphological characterisation of Digital Elevation Models , 1996 .

[20]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Reasoning Web. Semantic Technologies for Intelligent Data Access , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.