DC power flow analysis incorporating interval input data and network parameters through the optimizing-scenarios method

Abstract DC power flow analysis is based on a linear approximation model for AC power flow equations, and represents an efficient approach for acquiring the bus angles and active transmission power of a power grid. However, the input data and network parameters of the power grid are uncertain due to numerous internal and external factors. Therefore, the DC power flow model should be considered as an uncertain problem, which makes deterministic DC power flow analysis methods unworkable. The present work overcomes this problem by regarding uncertain input data and network parameters as interval values, respectively, and establishes the interval DC power flow (IDCPF) models considering interval input data only (denoted as IDCPF01), and IDCPF model including both interval input data and network parameters (denoted as IDCPF02). Analyses based on the IDCPF models seek to obtain conservative ranges of bus angles and active transmission power flow, which can be employed by dispatchers to develop strategies for ensuring the operational security of the power system. The optimizing-scenarios method (OSM) is employed here to solve the IDCPF models. In addition, it is proven that the lower (or upper) bounds of the bus angles of the IDCPF01 model are simultaneously obtained when the injected power is set as its lower (or upper) interval bounds. This fact greatly improves the efficiency of the OSM for solving the IDCPF models. The results obtained by the proposed method are compared with those obtained by Monte Carlo simulation, the AA-based method, and the interval AC power flow method. The overall simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.

[1]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  An Affine Arithmetic-Based Methodology for Reliable Power Flow Analysis in the Presence of Data Uncertainty , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Alfredo Vaccaro,et al.  A Range Arithmetic-Based Optimization Model for Power Flow Analysis Under Interval Uncertainty , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  V. Sarkar,et al.  A Comprehensive Assessment of the Evolution of Financial Transmission Rights , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  S. Tso,et al.  An Extended Nonlinear Primal-Dual Interior-Point Algorithm for Reactive-Power Optimization of Large-Scale Power Systems with Discrete Control Variables , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[5]  Wang Chengshan Interval Algorithm of DC Power Flow Considering Uncertainty in Power Systems , 2007 .

[6]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Yih-huei Wan,et al.  Factors Relevant to Utility Integration of Intermittent Renewable Technologies , 1993 .

[8]  Wang Yan An Interval Algorithm for DC Power Flow Calculations Based on Krawczyk Algorithm , 2012 .

[9]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Solving of Interval DC Power Flow using Interval Hull Algorithm with Preconditioning , 2014 .

[10]  Ming Qiu,et al.  An Interval Power Flow Analysis Through Optimizing-Scenarios Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  Hanif Livani,et al.  DC power flow using fuzzy linear equations , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[12]  R. Adapa,et al.  Multi-area unit commitment via sequential method and a DC power flow network model , 1994 .

[13]  Sheriff Sadiqbatcha,et al.  An analytical approach for solving type-1 and type-2 fully fuzzy linear systems of equations , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[14]  A. R. Abhyankar,et al.  Agent based decentralized DC load flow computation , 2016, 2016 National Power Systems Conference (NPSC).

[15]  Sheriff Sadiqbatcha,et al.  Fuzzified DC power flow analysis , 2016, 2016 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[16]  Honwing Ngan,et al.  A Mixed Interval Power Flow Analysis Under Rectangular and Polar Coordinate System , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  O. Alsaç,et al.  Security Constrained Unit Commitment: Network Modeling and Solution Issues , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[18]  R. Palma-Behnke,et al.  Fuzzy Arithmetic for the DC Load Flow , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Pandelis N. Biskas,et al.  Decentralised DC load flow and applications to transmission management , 2002 .

[20]  C. Cañizares,et al.  An Affine Arithmetic method to solve the stochastic power flow problem based on a mixed complementarity formulation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[21]  Hamidreza Zareipour,et al.  Probabilistic Power Flow by Monte Carlo Simulation With Latin Supercube Sampling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  A. Bakirtzis,et al.  A decentralized solution to the DC-OPF of interconnected power systems , 2003 .

[23]  Seyed Hossein Hosseinian,et al.  Introducing a Novel DC Power Flow Method With Reactive Power Considerations , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[24]  A. Santos,et al.  An Optimization Model for Long-Range Transmission Expansion Planning , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[25]  Raquel García-Bertrand,et al.  Dynamic Robust Transmission Expansion Planning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Malcolm Irving,et al.  Analysis of confidence bounds in power system state estimation with uncertainty in both measurements and parameters , 2006 .