Dynamic model of the octopus arm. II. Control of reaching movements.

The dynamic model of the octopus arm described in the first paper of this 2-part series was used here to investigate the neural strategies used for controlling the reaching movements of the octopus arm. These are stereotypical extension movements used to reach toward an object. In the dynamic model, sending a simple propagating neural activation signal to contract all muscles along the arm produced an arm extension with kinematic properties similar to those of natural movements. Control of only 2 parameters fully specified the extension movement: the amplitude of the activation signal (leading to the generation of muscle force) and the activation traveling time (the time the activation wave takes to travel along the arm). We found that the same kinematics could be achieved by applying activation signals with different activation amplitudes all exceeding some minimal level. This suggests that the octopus arm could use minimal amplitudes of activation to generate the minimal muscle forces required for the production of the desired kinematics. Larger-amplitude signals would generate larger forces that increase the arm's stability against perturbations without changing the kinematic characteristics. The robustness of this phenomenon was demonstrated by examining activation signals with either a constant or a bell-shaped velocity profile. Our modeling suggests that the octopus arm biomechanics may allow independent control of kinematics and resistance to perturbation during arm extension movements.

[1]  C. S. Wardle,et al.  Limit of fish swimming speed , 1975, Nature.

[2]  Dan Rokni,et al.  Ionic currents underlying fast action potentials in the obliquely striated muscle cells of the octopus arm. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  M. Wells,et al.  The Function of the Brain of Octopus in Tactile Discrimination , 1957 .

[5]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Dynamic model of the octopus arm. I. Biomechanics of the octopus reaching movement. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Hochner,et al.  Neuromuscular system of the flexible arm of the octopus: physiological characterization. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  G. Fiorito,et al.  Problem solving ability of Octopus vulgaris Lamarck (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). , 1990, Behavioral and neural biology.

[8]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Morasso Spatial control of arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  W. Kier,et al.  Tongues, tentacles and trunks: the biomechanics of movement in muscular‐hydrostats , 1985 .

[12]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[13]  B. Hochner,et al.  Patterns of Arm Muscle Activation Involved in Octopus Reaching Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  D. Ostry,et al.  Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Fundamentals of motor behavior , 1990 .

[16]  Gregory S. Chirikjian,et al.  A modal approach to hyper-redundant manipulator kinematics , 1994, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Y Gutfreund,et al.  Organization of Octopus Arm Movements: A Model System for Studying the Control of Flexible Arms , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Y. Engel,et al.  , Ranit Aharonov , Yaakov Engel , Binyamin of the Octopus Reaching Movement Dynamic Model of the Octopus Arm , 2005 .

[19]  J. Young The diameters of the fibres of the peripheral nerves of Octopus , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[20]  B. Hochner,et al.  Control of Octopus Arm Extension by a Peripheral Motor Program , 2001, Science.

[21]  C. Hsiao,et al.  Moulting hormone production in the isolated larval abdomen of the Colorado beetle , 1975, Nature.

[22]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.