Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention

Retrieving information from memory makes that information more recallable in the future than it otherwise would have been. Optimizing retrieval practice has been assumed, on the basis of evidence and arguments tracing back to Landauer and Bjork (1978), to require an expanding-interval schedule of successive retrievals, but recent findings suggest that expanding retrieval practice may be inferior to uniform-interval retrieval practice when memory is tested after a long retention interval. We report three experiments in which participants read educational passages and were then repeatedly tested, without feedback, after an expanding or uniform sequence of intervals. On a test 1 week later, recall was enhanced by the expanding schedule, but only when the task between successive retrievals was highly interfering with memory for the passage. These results suggest that the extent to which learners benefit from expanding retrieval practice depends on the degree to which the to-belearned information is vulnerable to forgetting.

[1]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[2]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning , 1967 .

[3]  D. Balota,et al.  Is Expanded Retrieval Practice a Superior Form of Spaced Retrieval? A Critical Review of the Extant Literature. , 2007 .

[4]  David A. Balota,et al.  Expanded vs. Equal Interval Spaced Retrieval Practice: Exploring Different Schedules of Spacing and Retention Interval in Younger and Older Adults , 2008, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[5]  J. A. McGeoch Forgetting and the law of disuse. , 1932 .

[6]  C. Camp Spaced Retrieval: A Model for Dissemination of a Cognitive Intervention for Persons with Dementia. , 2006 .

[7]  John A. Glover,et al.  The "Testing" Phenomenon: Not Gone but Nearly Forgotten , 1989 .

[8]  H. F. Spitzer Studies in retention. , 1939 .

[9]  William L. Cull,et al.  Untangling the benefits of multiple study opportunities and repeated testing for cued recall , 2000 .

[10]  Michael C. Anderson,et al.  Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. , 1996 .

[11]  Lnnny L. Jecosy On Interpreting the Effects of Repetition : Solving a Problem Versus Remembering a Solution , 2010 .

[12]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  B. Underwood Interference and forgetting. , 1957, Psychological review.

[14]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[15]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Learning from Tests: The Case of True-False Examinations , 1989 .

[16]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[17]  Alan S. Brown,et al.  Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium , 1976 .

[18]  R. Bjork Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[19]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Altering memory representations through retrieval. , 1985 .

[20]  D. Gopher,et al.  Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. , 1999 .

[21]  D. Schacter,et al.  Remediation of memory disorders: experimental evaluation of the spaced-retrieval technique. , 1985, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[22]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. , 1999 .

[23]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Errorless learning in the rehabilitation of memory impaired people , 1994 .

[24]  H. Pashler,et al.  The influence of retrieval on retention , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[25]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Differential effects of study and test trials on long-term recognition and recall , 1971 .

[26]  R. L. Solso Theories in cognitive psychology : the Loyola symposium , 1975 .

[27]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Disparate Effects of Repeated Testing: Reconciling Ballard's (1913) and Bartlett's (1932) Results , 1992 .

[28]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  Effects on a later recall by delaying initial recall. , 1976 .

[29]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  P. E. Morris,et al.  Practical aspects of memory : current research and issues , 1988 .

[31]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Learning from tests: Effects of spacing , 1977 .

[32]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  The effect of expanded versus massed practice on the retention of multiplication facts and spelling lists. , 1985 .

[33]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[34]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. , 1974 .

[35]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  Distributing and Managing the Conditions of Encoding and Practice , 1996 .

[36]  David A Balota,et al.  Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  Application of the Testing and Spacing Effects to Name Learning , 2005 .

[38]  H. Pashler,et al.  Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  William L. Cull,et al.  Expanding understanding of the expanding-pattern-of-retrieval mnemonic: Toward confidence in applicability , 1996 .