Prestressed reinforced soil by geosynthetics – Concept and experimental investigations

Abstract This paper presents experimental investigations on an innovative construction method for reinforced soil structures by geosynthetics called prestressed reinforced soil. The concept of prestressed reinforced soil, (PRS i ) developed to increase the bearing capacity of a reinforced soil structure and to improve its displacement behaviour is introduced. The concept of PRS i is validated by experimental studies. Large scale experimental tests conducted at the Institute of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering at Graz University of Technology, Austria and their results are presented. Over 60 path-controlled static load displacement tests have been performed to investigate the load displacement behaviour of 10 different reinforced soil structures. The reinforced soil structures have been constructed under homogeneous laboratory conditions with respect to construction sequence, compaction, temperature and measurement equipment to assure high quality reproducible test results. The overall results show a considerable improvement of the macroscopic load displacement behaviour of the soil structure by utilizing the concept of prestressed reinforced soil. In addition 80 cyclic load displacement tests have been conducted in Weimar, Germany to validate the concept of PRS i under cyclic loading conditions. A soil element, theoretically taken out of a reinforced soil structure, is used to investigate its behaviour under vertical cyclic load and horizontal support conditions. The macroscopic research shows that displacements occurring under cyclic loading can be reduced tremendously by installing a geogrid with the concept of PRS i . Besides investigating the macroscopic load displacement behaviour of the reinforced soil structure a detailed mesoscopic analysis using the Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) method has been performed. From the PIV analysis it was demonstrated that the vertical and horizontal displacements under cyclic loading and below the geogrid layer decreased rapidly.

[1]  Ennio M. Palmeira,et al.  Soil–geosynthetic interaction: Modelling and analysis ☆ , 2009 .

[2]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Pullout force/displacement relationship of extensible grid reinforcements , 1994 .

[3]  Noriyuki Yasufuku,et al.  CONFINING EFFECT OF GEOGRID-REINFORCED SOIL: INTRODUCTION INTO DESIGN METHOD , 2000 .

[4]  Dennes T. Bergado,et al.  Soft Ground Improvement in Lowland and Other Environments , 1996 .

[5]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in coarse-grained soils , 2013 .

[6]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  A new simple method to substantially increase the seismic stability of reinforced soil structures , 2002 .

[7]  Robert M. Koerner,et al.  Designing with Geosynthetics , 1986 .

[8]  M. R. Dyer.  Observation of the stress distribution in crushed glass with applications to soil reinforcement , 1985 .

[9]  Taro Uchimura,et al.  PRELOADED AND PRESTRESSED REINFORCED SOIL , 1997 .

[10]  G. W. E. Milligan,et al.  SCALE AND OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING THE RESULTS OF PULL-OUT TESTS OF GRIDS BURIED IN SAND , 1989 .

[11]  Jinchun Chai,et al.  Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements , 1993 .

[12]  Nagaratnam Sivakugan,et al.  Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing , 2010 .

[13]  Suksun Horpibulsuk,et al.  Performance of an earth wall stabilized with bearing reinforcements , 2011 .

[14]  Yu-Hsien Ho,et al.  Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces , 2009 .

[15]  Thomas C. Sheahan,et al.  Measuring and Modeling Time Dependent Soil Behavior , 1996 .