Role of acute kidney injury biomarkers to guide renal replacement therapy initiation, what we learn from EARLY-RRT trial and FST trial?

We wrote this letter to the editor in response to the commentary by Hoste et al ., and Meersch et al ., on our trial “The effect of early Renal Replacement Therapy guided by plasma Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin on outcome of Acute Kidney Injury: a feasibility study (EARLY-RRT)” trial which was recently published in the J Crit Care (1). In brief, we divided the study into two phases, triage and interventional phase, running subsequently. As a guide for triage to renal replacement therapy (RRT), we measured plasma neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (pNGAL) at the enrollment time. Forty patients with pNGAL ≥400 ng/mL (high pNGAL group) were randomized to ‘early’ or ‘standard’ group. Patients with pNGAL <400 ng/mL (n=20) were defined as low pNGAL group. The triggering pNGAL selected acute kidney injury (AKI) patients with more severity of illness and worse clinical outcome. However, in high pNGAL group, early RRT did not result in different 28-day mortality from the standard group. The median numbers of day free from mechanical ventilation were significantly higher in the early RRT group.

[1]  D. Annane,et al.  Timing of Renal‐Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Kellum,et al.  Early versus standard initiation of renal replacement therapy in furosemide stress test non-responsive acute kidney injury patients (the FST trial) , 2018, Critical Care.

[3]  S. Eiam‐Ong,et al.  The effect of early renal replacement therapy guided by plasma neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin on outcome of acute kidney injury: A feasibility study , 2018, Journal of critical care.

[4]  Zhe Luo,et al.  A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, BMC Nephrology.

[5]  S. Bagshaw,et al.  Strategies for the optimal timing to start renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. , 2017, Kidney international.

[6]  K. Kashani,et al.  Earlier versus later initiation of renal replacement therapy among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, Annals of Intensive Care.

[7]  Dong Wan,et al.  The effect of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  R. Das,et al.  Early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury-a systematic review & meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2017, BMC Nephrology.

[9]  Shaomin Li,et al.  Initiation time of renal replacement therapy on patients with acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of 8179 participants , 2017, Nephrology.

[10]  J. Kellum,et al.  Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[11]  F. Tubach,et al.  Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Kimmel,et al.  Development and Standardization of a Furosemide Stress Test to Predict the Severity of Acute Kidney Injury , 2013, Critical Care.

[13]  D. Angus,et al.  Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin predicts recovery from acute kidney injury following community-acquired pneumonia , 2011, Kidney international.