Combined strategies in structure-based virtual screening.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tingjun Hou | Dongsheng Cao | Huiyong Sun | Dan Li | Zhe Wang | Chao Shen | Xueping Hu | Junbo Gao | Huiyong Sun | Dan Li | Tingjun Hou | Zhe Wang | Dongsheng Cao | Chao Shen | Xueping Hu | Junbo Gao
[1] Gabriele Cruciani,et al. A Common Reference Framework for Analyzing/Comparing Proteins and Ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands And Proteins (FLAP): Theory and Application , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[2] Youyong Li,et al. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[3] Alessandro Contini,et al. Explicit Ligand Hydration Shells Improve the Correlation between MM-PB/GBSA Binding Energies and Experimental Activities. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[4] Cristiano R W Guimarães,et al. MM-GB/SA rescoring of docking poses. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.
[5] J. Onuchic,et al. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.
[6] Andrea Spitaleri,et al. BiKi Life Sciences: A New Suite for Molecular Dynamics and Related Methods in Drug Discovery , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] Francesca Spyrakis,et al. Discovering New Casein Kinase 1d Inhibitors with an Innovative Molecular Dynamics Enabled Virtual Screening Workflow. , 2018, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.
[8] D. Koshland. Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis. , 1958, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[9] Malgorzata N. Drwal,et al. Combination of ligand- and structure-based methods in virtual screening. , 2013, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[10] Andrea Spitaleri,et al. Fast Dynamic Docking Guided by Adaptive Electrostatic Bias: The MD-Binding Approach. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[11] P A Kollman,et al. Continuum solvent studies of the stability of RNA hairpin loops and helices. , 1998, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[12] Alan Talevi,et al. Combined Virtual Screening Strategies , 2009 .
[13] Youyong Li,et al. Discovery of novel inhibitors targeting the macrophage migration inhibitory factor via structure-based virtual screening and bioassays. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[14] Reiji Teramoto,et al. Supervised Consensus Scoring for Docking and Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[15] R. Nussinov,et al. Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .
[16] Tingjun Hou,et al. Assessing an Ensemble Docking-Based Virtual Screening Strategy for Kinase Targets by Considering Protein Flexibility , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[17] Xiaohua Zhang,et al. Toward Fully Automated High Performance Computing Drug Discovery: A Massively Parallel Virtual Screening Pipeline for Docking and Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area Rescoring to Improve Enrichment , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[18] D. J. Price,et al. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[19] Huikun Zhang,et al. Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[20] Dávid Bajusz,et al. DUckCov: a Dynamic Undocking‐Based Virtual Screening Protocol for Covalent Binders , 2019, ChemMedChem.
[21] Alessandro Contini,et al. Improved Computation of Protein-Protein Relative Binding Energies with the Nwat-MMGBSA Method , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[22] Scott P. Brown,et al. Large-scale application of high-throughput molecular mechanics with Poisson-Boltzmann surface area for routine physics-based scoring of protein-ligand complexes. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] A. Cavalli,et al. Dynamic Docking: A Paradigm Shift in Computational Drug Discovery , 2017, Molecules.
[24] Stefano Alcaro,et al. A Pipeline To Enhance Ligand Virtual Screening: Integrating Molecular Dynamics and Fingerprints for Ligand and Proteins , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] Bohdan Waszkowycz,et al. Towards improving compound selection in structure-based virtual screening. , 2008, Drug discovery today.
[26] Hualiang Jiang,et al. Identifying novel selective non-nucleoside DNA methyltransferase 1 inhibitors through docking-based virtual screening. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[27] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Virtual screening of chemical libraries , 2004, Nature.
[28] Tingjun Hou,et al. Constructing and Validating High-Performance MIEC-SVM Models in Virtual Screening for Kinases: A Better Way for Actives Discovery , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[29] M. Entzeroth,et al. Emerging trends in high-throughput screening. , 2003, Current opinion in pharmacology.
[30] Xi-Ping Huang,et al. Structure-Based Discovery of Novel and Selective 5-Hydroxytryptamine 2B Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[31] Hwangseo Park,et al. Consensus Scoring Approach To Identify the Inhibitors of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase α2 with Virtual Screening , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[32] J. Bajorath,et al. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[33] Yan Liu,et al. Structure-Based Identification of Novel Ligands Targeting Multiple Sites within a Chemokine-G-Protein-Coupled-Receptor Interface. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[34] F. J. Luque,et al. Dynamic undocking and the quasi-bound state as tools for drug discovery , 2016, Nature Chemistry.
[35] R. Nussinov,et al. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[36] Shaomeng Wang,et al. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[37] Nagi G. Ayad,et al. DD-01LIGAND- AND STRUCTURE-BASED VIRTUAL SCREENING TO DISCOVER POLYPHARMACOLOGICAL DUAL EGFR AND BRD4 INHIBITORS , 2014 .
[38] D. E. Clark,et al. Outstanding challenges in protein–ligand docking and structure‐based virtual screening , 2011 .
[39] Elizabeth Yuriev,et al. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review , 2011, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[40] Tingjun Hou,et al. Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[41] Edward W. Lowe,et al. Computational Methods in Drug Discovery , 2014, Pharmacological Reviews.
[42] Felice C. Lightstone,et al. Accounting for water molecules in drug design , 2011, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[43] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on an Updated Benchmark: 2. Evaluation Methods and General Results , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[44] Sandra Solari,et al. Identification of novel 11β-HSD1 inhibitors by combined ligand- and structure-based virtual screening , 2014, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.
[45] Tingjun Hou,et al. Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Virtual Screening Strategy by Combining Molecular Docking and Pharmacophore Searching Based on Multiple Protein Structures , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[46] Gisbert Schneider,et al. Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[47] Cícero Nogueira dos Santos,et al. Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[48] Jahan B. Ghasemi,et al. Dynamic structure based pharmacophore modeling of the Acetylcholinesterase reveals several potential inhibitors , 2019, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[49] E. Fischer. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der Enzyme , 1894 .
[50] Shu Liu,et al. Application of Consensus Scoring and Principal Component Analysis for Virtual Screening against β-Secretase (BACE-1) , 2012, PloS one.
[51] Xiaoqin Zou,et al. Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[52] Dan Li,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[53] Dan Li,et al. Discovery of Novel ROCK1 Inhibitors via Integrated Virtual Screening Strategy and Bioassays , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[54] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[55] G. Oliva,et al. Virtual screening and its integration with modern drug design technologies. , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.
[56] L. Kavraki,et al. Understanding the challenges of protein flexibility in drug design , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[57] Irene Maffucci,et al. An Efficient Implementation of the Nwat-MMGBSA Method to Rescore Docking Results in Medium-Throughput Virtual Screenings , 2018, Front. Chem..
[58] E. Di Cera,et al. Conformational selection is a dominant mechanism of ligand binding. , 2013, Biochemistry.
[59] J. Mccammon,et al. Exploring the role of receptor flexibility in structure-based drug discovery. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.
[60] J. Changeux,et al. Conformational selection or induced fit? 50 years of debate resolved , 2011, F1000 biology reports.
[61] E. Di Cera,et al. Conformational selection or induced fit? A critical appraisal of the kinetic mechanism. , 2012, Biochemistry.
[62] S. Genheden,et al. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[63] D. Case,et al. Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[64] Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al. Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.
[65] P. Kollman,et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.
[66] M. Lill. Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations. , 2011, Biochemistry.
[67] Hualiang Jiang,et al. Discovery and Optimization of Novel, Selective Histone Methyltransferase SET7 Inhibitors by Pharmacophore- and Docking-Based Virtual Screening. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[68] Dariusz Plewczynski,et al. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[69] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. High-throughput and in silico screenings in drug discovery , 2009, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[70] László Kovács,et al. Structure-Based Consensus Scoring Scheme for Selecting Class A Aminergic GPCR Fragments , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[71] Ismael Zamora,et al. Suitability of GRIND-Based Principal Properties for the Description of Molecular Similarity and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[72] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[73] Mikko J. Vainio,et al. Similarity based virtual screening: a tool for targeted library design. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[74] R. Zwanzig. High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .
[75] Matteo Masetti,et al. Protein Flexibility in Drug Discovery: From Theory to Computation , 2015, ChemMedChem.
[76] M L Teodoro,et al. Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure based drug design. , 2003, Current pharmaceutical design.
[77] Ashini Bolia,et al. Adaptive BP-Dock: An Induced Fit Docking Approach for Full Receptor Flexibility , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[78] Youyong Li,et al. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[79] Pratyush Tiwary,et al. Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[80] Philip C Biggin,et al. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[81] Yoshiaki Nakagawa,et al. Structure-based virtual screening for insect ecdysone receptor ligands using MM/PBSA. , 2019, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[82] Stephani Joy Y Macalino,et al. Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery , 2015, Archives of Pharmacal Research.
[83] Jie Liu,et al. Classification of Current Scoring Functions , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[84] Jessica Holien,et al. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012–2013 in review , 2015, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[85] Xudong Huang,et al. Deep learning and virtual drug screening , 2018, Future medicinal chemistry.
[86] Chung F. Wong,et al. Flexible receptor docking for drug discovery , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[87] Paul D Lyne,et al. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. , 2002, Drug discovery today.
[88] Leonardo L. G. Ferreira,et al. Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies , 2015, Molecules.
[89] Tingjun Hou,et al. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[90] M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro,et al. CompScore: Boosting Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance by Incorporating Docking Scoring Function Components into Consensus Scoring , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[91] Andrea Cavalli,et al. Recent advances in dynamic docking for drug discovery , 2017 .
[92] R. Nussinov,et al. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.
[93] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[94] Miklos Feher,et al. Consensus scoring for protein-ligand interactions. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[95] Naomie Salim,et al. Ligand expansion in ligand-based virtual screening using relevance feedback , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[96] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. , 2005, Current pharmaceutical design.
[97] D. Koshland. The Key–Lock Theory and the Induced Fit Theory , 1995 .
[98] Chen Cui,et al. Improving the Virtual Screening Ability of Target-Specific Scoring Functions Using Deep Learning Methods , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..
[99] Tao Wang,et al. Fragment-based drug discovery and molecular docking in drug design. , 2015, Current pharmaceutical biotechnology.
[100] J. Kirkwood. Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .
[101] Marta M. Stepniewska-Dziubinska,et al. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction , 2017, Bioinform..
[102] David S. Goodsell,et al. Protein Flexibility in Virtual Screening: The BACE-1 Case Study , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[103] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[104] Tingjun Hou,et al. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[105] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Virtual compound screening in drug discovery. , 2012, Future medicinal chemistry.
[106] Supratik Mukhopadhyay,et al. A graph-based approach to construct target-focused libraries for virtual screening , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.
[107] Jian Wang,et al. Characterization of Small Molecule Binding. I. Accurate Identification of Strong Inhibitors in Virtual Screening , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[108] Zhihai Liu,et al. Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions on a Diverse Test Set , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[109] J. Aqvist,et al. A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.
[110] D. Frank Hsu,et al. Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[111] Thierry Langer,et al. A Molecular Dynamics–Shared Pharmacophore Approach to Boost Early‐Enrichment Virtual Screening: A Case Study on Peroxisome Proliferator‐Activated Receptor α , 2017, ChemMedChem.
[112] Bo Ding,et al. Characterizing Binding of Small Molecules. II. Evaluating the Potency of Small Molecules to Combat Resistance Based on Docking Structures , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[113] Tingjun Hou,et al. Identification and Preliminary SAR Analysis of Novel Type-I Inhibitors of TIE-2 via Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Biological Evaluation in in vitro Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[114] Pei Tang,et al. Ensemble-based virtual screening for cannabinoid-like potentiators of the human glycine receptor α1 for the treatment of pain. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[115] Nagi G. Ayad,et al. Abstract 3690: Ligand- and structure-based virtual screening to discover dual EGFR and BRD4 inhibitors , 2015 .
[116] Felice C Lightstone,et al. Approaches to efficiently estimate solvation and explicit water energetics in ligand binding: the use of WaterMap , 2013, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[117] Wafik S El-Deiry,et al. Genetic and Pharmacological Screens Converge in Identifying FLIP, BCL2, and IAP Proteins as Key Regulators of Sensitivity to the TRAIL-Inducing Anticancer Agent ONC201/TIC10. , 2015, Cancer research.
[118] Maurizio Recanatini,et al. How dynamic docking simulations can help to tackle tough drug targets. , 2018, Future medicinal chemistry.
[119] Thierry Langer,et al. Common Hits Approach: Combining Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[120] Wolfgang Sippl,et al. Virtual Screening of PRK1 Inhibitors: Ensemble Docking, Rescoring Using Binding Free Energy Calculation and QSAR Model Development , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[121] Yi-Hui Peng,et al. Identification of Substituted Naphthotriazolediones as Novel Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase (TDO) Inhibitors through Structure-Based Virtual Screening. , 2015, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[122] Alessandro Pedretti,et al. Rescoring and Linearly Combining: A Highly Effective Consensus Strategy for Virtual Screening Campaigns , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.