How does scientific success relate to individual and organizational characteristics? A scientometric study of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries

Purpose: To provide up-to-date bibliometric reference data describing the output and success of psychology researchers in the German-speaking countries, including lifetime publication and citation numbers, and to investigate associations of bibliometric measures with academic status and gender as well as the department characteristics of size and quota of senior researchers. Method Queried literature databases using an extensive online register of academic psychologists in the German-speaking countries, obtaining valid data for 85 % (N = 1742) of the population of interest. Findings Skewed distributions for publications and citations; maximum number of German-language (=native) publications much higher than maximum number of English-language publications; relatively large part of population publishing almost exclusively in German; publication count predictable by academic status, gender, department size, and quota of senior researchers; citation count predictable by publication count, status, department size, and quota of senior researchers; department characteristics interact with individual characteristics to produce specific conditions under which publication count and citation count are higher or lower than expected: combination of female gender, small department size and large quota of senior researchers is associated with particularly increased publication count; female gender and large department size are associated with decreased publication count; high publication count, large department size and low quota of senior researchers are associated with increased citation count; low publication count and large quota of senior researchers are associated with decreased citation count. Conclusions Reference values for scientific output provided in this study provide an anchor for monitoring and international comparison; despite considerable noise in data, we show that interactions of individual and organizational characteristics are relevant for scientific success and should be investigated further, e.g. by adopting various measures of organizational diversity and tracing a population longitudinally.

[1]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Benchmarking policy measures for gender equality in science , 2008 .

[2]  Neil R. Smalheiser,et al.  Author name disambiguation , 2009, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[4]  J. Muñoz,et al.  [Lost Science in the Third World]. , 1996, Gaceta medica de Mexico.

[5]  Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz,et al.  Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach , 2011, Scientometrics.

[6]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Temporal Patterns of Variable Relationships in Person-Oriented Research: Prediction and Auto-Association Models of Configural Frequency Analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review , 2003 .

[8]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[9]  Gabriel Schui,et al.  Zur Internationalität der Pädagogischen Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich , 2007 .

[10]  José Navarrete-Cortés,et al.  Global Psychology: a bibliometric analysis of Web of Science Publications , 2010 .

[11]  Yin Ling Cheung,et al.  First publications in refereed English journals: Difficulties, coping strategies, and recommendations for student training , 2010 .

[12]  D. Aksnes,et al.  Researchers’ perceptions of citations , 2009 .

[13]  Gabriel Schui,et al.  ZPID-Monitor 2007 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich - Der ausführliche Bericht , 2009 .

[14]  D. Pontille,et al.  The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities , 2010 .

[15]  Gregory D. Webster,et al.  The research productivity of academic psychologists: assessment, trends, and best practice recommendations , 2011, Scientometrics.

[16]  Tomáš Havránek,et al.  Local and Regional vs. Global Contingency Testing , 1984 .

[17]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[18]  Leo A. Goodman,et al.  Causal Analysis of Data from Panel Studies and Other Kinds of Surveys , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Henry M. Nodelman.  Introduction to Boolean algebra and logic design/a program for self-introduction, Gerhard E. Hoernes and Melvin F. Heilweil , 1965, IEEE Spectrum.

[20]  Marian N. Ruderman,et al.  Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. , 1995 .

[21]  A. Eye,et al.  Log-Linear Modeling: Concepts, Interpretation, and Application , 2012 .

[22]  ALEXANDER VON,et al.  Prediction models for Configural Frequency Analysis , 2005 .

[23]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[24]  T. Little,et al.  Advances in Configural Frequency Analysis , 2010 .

[25]  Melvin F. Heilweil,et al.  Introduction to Boolean Algebra and Logic Design: A Program for Self Instruction , 1964 .

[26]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The effects of changes in the funding structure of the Flemish universities on their research capacity, productivity and impact during the 1980's and early 1990's , 1998, Scientometrics.

[27]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Forecasting trends of development of psychology from a bibliometric perspective , 2011, Scientometrics.

[28]  John S. Rigden.  J. Robert Oppenheimer: Before the War , 1995 .

[29]  Gabriel Schui,et al.  Krampen, Günter (Hrsg.): Internationalität und Internationalisierung der deutschsprachigen Psychologie : Fakten, Bewertungen, Erfahrungen und Empfehlungen von Experten , 2005 .

[30]  Lars R Bergman,et al.  Research strategies in developmental psychopathology: Dimensional identity and the person-oriented approach , 2003, Development and Psychopathology.

[31]  R. Bauserman,et al.  International Representation in the Psychological Literature , 1997 .

[32]  J. Krauth,et al.  Configural Frequency Analysis As a Statistical Tool for Defining Types , 1975 .

[33]  Gabriel Schui,et al.  ZPID-Monitor 2009 zur Internationalität der Psychologie aus dem deutschsprachigen Bereich: Der Kurzbericht , 2011 .

[34]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[35]  G. Krampen,et al.  Bibliometrische Befunde zur Entwicklung der Teildisziplinen der Psychologie: zur Geschichte der internationalen und der deutschsprachigen Fachliteratur , 1993 .

[36]  Werner H. Tack.  Bericht über Reaktionen auf einen Bericht: Zu Keul, Gigerenzer und Stroebes SSCI-Analyse , 1994 .

[37]  Hugo Horta,et al.  How does size matter for science? Exploring the effects of research unit size on academics scientific productivity and information exchange behaviors , 2011 .

[38]  Winfried Hacker,et al.  Internationalisierung der psychologischen Forschung in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz: Sieben Empfehlungen , 1999 .

[39]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  Log-Linear Models for Event Histories , 1997 .

[40]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[41]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.

[42]  Alexander von Eye,et al.  Configural Frequency Analysis: The Search for Extreme Cells , 2004 .

[43]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Severe language effect in university rankings: particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings , 2010, Scientometrics.

[44]  R. Kostoff.  The (scientific) wealth of nations , 2004 .

[45]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..