Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment

This study was an investigation of the effects of learner control and of advisement in a hypertext learning environment with second-grade students who had different levels of prior knowledge about the content. Four treatment conditions crossing two variables, learner control (free access representing network structuring of hypertext vs. limited access representing hierarchical structuring of hypertext), and advisement (advisement vs. no-advisement), were established. From the quantitative and qualitative data, results indicated that: (a) for low prior knowledge (PK) students, the limited-access condition was more effective than the free-access condition, whereas high-PK students were able to function equally well in both conditions; (b) the free-access group reported a higher positive attitude for advisement than for no advisement, but the limited-access group showed no such difference in preference; (c) the low-PK group completed the lesson more quickly without advisement than with advisement, whereas the high-PK group's completion times did not vary across advisement conditions; and (d) analysis of the path data indicated that advisement was helpful in preventing disorientation in the free-access condition.

[1]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Learner control of context and instructional support in learning elementary school mathematics , 1992 .

[2]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  Do Learners Make Good Choices , 1984 .

[3]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learner-controlled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task , 1983 .

[4]  Paul M. Balson,et al.  Instructor-Controlled versus Student-Controlled Training in a Videodisc-Based Paramedical Program , 1984 .

[5]  R. Tennyson Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. , 1980 .

[6]  Geri Gay,et al.  Perceptions of control and use of control options in computer-assisted video instruction , 1988 .

[7]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Hypertext and hypermedia , 1990 .

[8]  George H. Stevens,et al.  Applying hypermedia for performance improvement , 1989 .

[9]  E. H. Robson,et al.  Learner Control in Computer Assisted Learning. , 1985 .

[10]  Ruth Garner,et al.  Children's Control of Computer-Based Reading Assistance in Answering Synthesis Questions. , 1989 .

[11]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Interactive Media Audit Trails: Approaches and Issues. , 1991 .

[12]  W. Estes,et al.  Toward a framework for combining connectionist and symbol-processing models☆ , 1988 .

[13]  H. Hintze,et al.  Students' Attitudes towards Control Methods in Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[14]  William D. Milheim,et al.  The Effects of Pacing and Sequence Control in an Interactive Video Lesson. , 1990 .

[15]  D. Levine Neural network principles for theoretical psychology , 1989 .

[16]  S. Ross,et al.  Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. , 1981 .

[17]  Diana M. Laurillard,et al.  Interactive video and the control of learning , 1984 .

[18]  Janis Morariu Hypermedia in instruction and training: the power and the promise , 1988 .

[19]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[20]  Lynne Anderson-Inman Electronic Studying: Information Organizers to Help Students to Study "Better" not "Harder"--Part II , 1989 .

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[22]  Angela B. Garcia,et al.  Effects of Student Control and Choice on Engagement in a CAI Arithmetic Task in a Low-Income School. , 1975 .

[23]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI , 1989 .

[24]  M. J. Henry,et al.  Hypertext Hands-On!: Ben Shneiderman and Greg Kearsley. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 1989. 165 pp. (plus two disks). $ 27.92. ISBN 0-201-15171-5 , 1995 .

[25]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[26]  Craig Locatis,et al.  Hypermedia and instruction , 1989 .

[27]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext , 1988 .

[28]  James D. Klein,et al.  Influence of Student Ability, Locus of Control, and Type of Instructional Control on Performance and Confidence. , 1990 .

[29]  Dennis Bowers,et al.  HyperCard in educational research: an introduction and case study , 1990 .

[30]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction , 1989 .

[31]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction , 1984 .

[32]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Hypertext Principles for text and Courseware Design , 1986 .

[33]  M. Hannafin,et al.  The Effect of the Locus of CAI Control Strategies on the Learning of Mathematics Rules , 1985 .

[34]  Safaa Hashim Exploring hypertext programming : writing knowledge representation and problem-solving programs , 1990 .

[35]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[36]  John C. Belland,et al.  Is the self-paced instructional program, via microcomputer-based instruction, the most effective method of addressing individual learning differences? , 1985 .

[37]  J. Fry Interactive Relationship between Inquisitiveness and Student Control of Instruction. , 1972 .