Should Environmental Filtering be Abandoned?

Environmental filtering, where the environment selects against certain species, is thought to be a major mechanism structuring communities. However, recent criticisms cast doubt on our ability to accurately infer filtering because competition can give rise to patterns identical to those caused by environmental filtering. While experiments can distinguish mechanisms, observational patterns are especially problematic. The environment determines community composition not only directly via survival, but also by influencing competition. If species population growth rates covary with environmental gradients, then outcomes of competitive exclusion will also vary with the environment. Here, we argue that observational studies remain valuable, but inferences about the importance of the environment cannot rely on compositional data alone, and that species abundances, population growth, or traits must be correlated with the environment.

[1]  S. Pickett,et al.  Is successional research nearing its climax? New approaches for understanding dynamic communities , 2015 .

[2]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[3]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[4]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest , 2010 .

[5]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities , 2009 .

[6]  D. Laughlin,et al.  Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration 1 Appendix S 1 . User ’ s guide and R code for applying trait-based models in ecological restoration Getting started , 2014 .

[7]  M. Cao,et al.  Functional traits of tree species with phylogenetic signal co-vary with environmental niches in two large forest dynamics plots , 2014 .

[8]  A. Guisan,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and proboscis length contribute to structuring bumblebee communities in the extremes of abiotic and biotic gradients , 2013 .

[9]  H. Pulliam.  On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[10]  D. Simberloff.  TAXONOMIC DIVERSITY OF ISLAND BIOTAS , 1970, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Brian J Enquist,et al.  The influence of spatial and size scale on phylogenetic relatedness in tropical forest communities. , 2007, Ecology.

[12]  T. Jonathan Davies,et al.  Phylogenies in Ecology: A Guide to Concepts and Methods , 2016 .

[13]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Untangling Multiple Factors in Spatial Distributions: Lilies, Gophers, and Rocks , 1996 .

[14]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[15]  Katharine N. Suding,et al.  Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes , 2012 .

[16]  N. Swenson,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity in tropical forests: Implications for the roles of geographical and environmental distance , 2013 .

[17]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Near‐to‐nature logging influences fungal community assembly processes in a temperate forest , 2014 .

[18]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Facilitation can increase the phylogenetic diversity of plant communities. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[19]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor , 2015 .

[20]  I Xenarios,et al.  Soil fungal communities of grasslands are environmentally structured at a regional scale in the Alps , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[21]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  D. Mouillot,et al.  New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. , 2008, Ecology.

[23]  J. Olden,et al.  Fish species introductions provide novel insights into the patterns and drivers of phylogenetic structure in freshwaters , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[25]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[26]  P. Keddy,et al.  The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities , 1995 .

[27]  J. Chave,et al.  Shifts in species and phylogenetic diversity between sapling and tree communities indicate negative density dependence in a lowland rain forest , 2010 .

[28]  Kyle G. Dexter,et al.  Using functional traits and phylogenetic trees to examine the assembly of tropical tree communities , 2012 .

[29]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Predicting communities from functional traits. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  N. Swenson.  Functional and Phylogenetic Ecology in R , 2014 .

[31]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Small-scale spatial variability in phylogenetic community structure during early plant succession depends on soil properties , 2014, Oecologia.

[32]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  Montane Mammalian Biogeography in New Mexico , 1980 .

[33]  P. Grant.  Ecological Compatibility of Bird Species on Islands , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[34]  M. Winter,et al.  Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better) , 2015 .

[35]  Lin Jiang,et al.  Species colonisation, not competitive exclusion, drives community overdispersion over long-term succession. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[36]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[37]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird communities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Change in community phylogenetic structure during tropical forest succession: evidence from New Guinea , 2012 .

[39]  M. Sykes,et al.  Evidence for scale‐ and disturbance‐dependent trait assembly patterns in dry semi‐natural grasslands , 2013 .

[40]  M. Cardillo.  The phylogenetic signal of species co-occurrence in high-diversity shrublands: different patterns for fire-killed and fire-resistant species , 2012, BMC Ecology.

[41]  R. Halvorsen,et al.  Arctic root‐associated fungal community composition reflects environmental filtering , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[42]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Interactions between goldenrod (Solidago altissima L.) and its insect herbivore (Trirhabda virgata) over the course of succession , 2000, Oecologia.

[43]  C. Graham,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[44]  James P. O'Dwyer,et al.  Phylogenetic Diversity Theory Sheds Light on the Structure of Microbial Communities , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[45]  C. Cannon,et al.  Communities contain closely related species during ecosystem disturbance. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[46]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[47]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology Letters.

[48]  R. Magarey,et al.  Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities , 2015, Nature.

[49]  J. Chave,et al.  Prevalence of phylogenetic clustering at multiple scales in an African rain forest tree community , 2014 .

[50]  C. Leuschner,et al.  Consistent patterns of elevational change in tree taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity across Malesian mountain forests , 2013 .

[51]  J. Chave,et al.  Phylogenetic density dependence and environmental filtering predict seedling mortality in a tropical forest. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[52]  E. Borer,et al.  Phylogenetic patterns differ for native and exotic plant communities across a richness gradient in Northern California , 2010 .

[53]  B. R. Ramesh,et al.  Phylogenetic turnover in tropical tree communities: impact of environmental filtering, biogeography and mesoclimatic niche conservatism , 2012 .

[54]  C. Elton.  Competition and the Structure of Ecological Communities , 1946 .

[55]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. , 2006, Ecology.

[56]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Phyloecology of urban alien floras , 2009 .

[57]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Phylogenetic community structure during succession: Evidence from three Neotropical forest sites , 2012 .

[58]  M. Cadotte,et al.  Contrasting patterns of lichen functional diversity and species richness across an elevation gradient , 2016 .

[59]  D. Srivastava.  Using local–regional richness plots to test for species saturation: pitfalls and potentials , 1999 .

[60]  Barbara C. Schmid,et al.  Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long‐term succession: insights into assembly processes , 2013 .

[61]  B. Emerson,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  J. Oostermeijer,et al.  The relationship between butterflies and environmental indicator values: a tool for conservation in a changing landscape , 1998 .

[63]  Stephen P Hubbell,et al.  The phylogenetic structure of a neotropical forest tree community. , 2006, Ecology.