Conversation Patterns between Children with Severe Speech Impairment and their Conversation Partners in Dyadic and Multi-person Interactions

Active engagement in interactions is crucial for the development of identity, social competence, and cognitive abilities. For children with severe speech impairment (SSI) who have little or no intelligible speech, active participation in conversations is challenging and can be critical for their social inclusion and participation. The present study investigated the conversational patterns emerging from interactions between children with SSI who use aided communication and typically speaking conversation partners (CPs) and explored whether active participation was different in interactions with different numbers of partners (dyad-ic versus multi-person interactions). An unusually large multilingual dataset was used ( N ¼ 85 conversations). This allowed us to systematically investigate discourse analysis measures indicating participation: the distribution of conversational control (initiations versus responses versus recodes) and summoning power (obliges versus comments). The findings suggest that (i) conversations were characterized by asymmetrical conversational patterns with CPs assuming most of the conversational control and (ii) multi-person interactions were no-ticeably more symmetric compared to dyadic, as children’s active participation in multi-person interactions was significantly increased. Clinical implications and best practice recommendations are discussed.

[1]  S. Bloch,et al.  Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures , 2018, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[2]  Yvonne Lynch,et al.  Instructional strategies used in direct AAC interventions with children to support graphic symbol learning: A systematic review , 2018 .

[3]  S. von Tetzchner Introduction to the special issue on aided language processes, development, and use: an international perspective , 2018, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[4]  A. Classen,et al.  Literacy instruction for young children with severe speech and physical impairments: A systematic review , 2017 .

[5]  Ralf W Schlosser,et al.  The effectiveness of aided augmented input techniques for persons with developmental disabilities: a systematic review , 2017, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[6]  Michael P. Kranak,et al.  Communication Opportunities for Elementary School Students who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2016, Augmentative and Alternative Communication : AAC.

[7]  N. Norén,et al.  Supporting a child with multiple disabilities to participate in social interaction: The case of asking a question , 2016, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[8]  David McNaughton,et al.  AAC Modeling Intervention Research Review , 2016 .

[9]  S. Levinson Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  S. Tetzchner The semiotics of aided language development , 2015 .

[11]  Martine M. Smith,et al.  Language Development of Individuals Who Require Aided Communication: Reflections on State of the Science and Future Research Directions , 2015, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[12]  Cathy Binger,et al.  Effects of Communication Partner Instruction on the Communication of Individuals using AAC: A Meta-Analysis , 2015, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[13]  Federica Barbieri,et al.  Involvement in University Classroom Discourse: Register Variation and Interactivity , 2015 .

[14]  G. King,et al.  Social Participation of School-aged Children Who Use Communication Aids: The Views of Children and Parents , 2014, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[15]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication? , 2014, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[16]  N. Enfield Relationship Thinking: Agency, Enchrony, and Human Sociality , 2013 .

[17]  K. Himmelmann,et al.  Development of The Viking Speech Scale to classify the speech of children with cerebral palsy. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[18]  E. Carter,et al.  Promoting Peer Interactions in Inclusive Classrooms for Students Who Use Speech-Generating Devices , 2013 .

[19]  L. Togher Improving Communication for People with Brain Injury in the 21st Century: The Value of Collaboration , 2013, Brain Impairment.

[20]  Erik W Carter,et al.  Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. , 2012, American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities.

[21]  M. Clarke,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication for children with cerebral palsy , 2012 .

[22]  Carmen Basil,et al.  Terminology and Notation in Written Representations of Conversations with Augmentative and Alternative Communication , 2011, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[23]  Charlotta Plejert,et al.  The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. , 2011, Communication & medicine.

[24]  Lindsay Pennington,et al.  Effects of it takes two to talk--the hanen program for parents of preschool children with cerebral palsy: findings from an exploratory study. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[25]  Janice Murray,et al.  Cognitive and language acquisition in typical and aided language learning: A review of recent evidence from an aided communication perspective , 2009 .

[26]  A. Panorska,et al.  DECtalk™ and VeriVox™: Intelligibility, Likeability, and Rate Preference Differences for Four Listener Groups , 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[27]  A. D. Sandberg,et al.  Patterns in early interaction between young preschool children with severe speech and physical impairments and their parents , 2008 .

[28]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[29]  Janice C Light,et al.  Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – communicative interaction , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[30]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 1: Organizing and understanding VOCA use , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[31]  Anthony J. Liddicoat,et al.  The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening , 2004 .

[32]  E. Drasgow,et al.  Enhancing socially adaptive communicative repairs of beginning communicators with disabilities. , 2004, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[33]  M. Clarke,et al.  Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers , 2003 .

[34]  Eve Müller,et al.  Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: variations across partners , 2002 .

[35]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: integrative review , 2002 .

[36]  H. McConachie,et al.  Predicting patterns of interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers. , 2001, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[37]  Judith Oxley,et al.  Children's use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use , 2000 .

[38]  H. McConachie,et al.  Mother-child interaction revisited: communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. , 1999, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[39]  H. McConachie,et al.  COMMUNICATION AIDS FOR CHILDREN: PROCEDURES AND PROBLEMS , 1992, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[40]  M. Blank,et al.  Dialogue with preschoolers: A cognitively-based System of assessment , 1980, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[41]  Martine Smith,et al.  "?this is not going to be like, you know, standard communication?". Naturally speaking adults using aided communication , 2016 .

[42]  R. Wilkinson,et al.  Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers. 1: organizing and understanding VOCA use. , 2007, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[43]  Cathy Binger,et al.  Building communicative competence with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication , 1998 .

[44]  Rose A. Sevcik,et al.  Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means , 1997 .

[45]  Gene H. Lerner Interaction and grammar: On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker , 1996 .

[46]  Nickola Wolf Nelson,et al.  Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users , 1992 .

[47]  J. Dattilo,et al.  Teaching the response-recode form to adults with mental retardation using AAC systems , 1992 .

[48]  Janice Light,et al.  Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary c , 1985 .

[49]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  Conversational control in nonimpaired speakers using an augmentative communication system , 1985 .

[50]  Christian Blume,et al.  Concept of Action , 1985 .