A new paradigm and computational framework to estimate stop-signal reaction time distributions from the inhibition of complex motor sequences

Inhibitory control is an important component of executive function that allows organisms to abort emerging behavioral plans or ongoing actions on the fly as new sensory information becomes available. Current models treat inhibitory control as a race between a Go- and a Stop process that may be mediated by partially distinct neural substrates, i.e., the direct and the hyper-direct pathway of the basal ganglia. The fact that finishing times of the Stop process (Stop-Signal Reaction Time, SSRT) cannot be observed directly has precluded a precise comparison of the functional properties that govern the initiation (GoRT) and inhibition (SSRT) of a motor response. To solve this problem, we modified an existing inhibitory paradigm and developed a non-parametric framework to measure the trial-by-trial variability of SSRT. A series of simulations verified that the non-parametric approach is on par with a parametric approach and yields accurate estimates of the entire SSRT distribution from as few as ~750 trials. Our results show that in identical settings, the distribution of SSRT is very similar to the distribution of GoRT albeit somewhat shorter, wider and significantly less right-skewed. The ability to measure the precise shapes of SSRT distributions opens new avenues for research into the functional properties of the hyper-direct pathway that is believed to mediate inhibitory control.

[1]  J. Schall,et al.  Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye ® eld , 2000 .

[2]  Leanne Boucher,et al.  Executive control of gaze by the frontal lobes , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  G. Logan,et al.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. , 2014, Psychological review.

[5]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[6]  Hans Colonius,et al.  A Note on the Stop-Signal Paradigm, or How to Observe the Unobservable , 1990 .

[7]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Countermanding saccades in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[8]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[11]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  G. Logan,et al.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. , 2007, Psychological review.

[14]  G. Logan,et al.  Development of inhibitory control across the life span. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[15]  Hans Colonius,et al.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model , 2001, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging Evidence for a Fronto-Basal-Ganglia Network for Inhibitory Control of Action and Cognition , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[18]  E. Salinas,et al.  The Countermanding Task Revisited: Fast Stimulus Detection Is a Key Determinant of Psychophysical Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit complex movements: A stop-signal study of typewriting. , 1982 .

[20]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Measuring online volitional response control with a continuous tracking task , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[22]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Compatibility Effects in Stopping and Response Initiation in a Continuous Tracking Task , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.