Modulating the charge-transfer enhancement in GERS using an electrical field under vacuum and an n/p-doping atmosphere.

The modulation of charger-transfer (CT) enhancement in graphene-enhanced Raman scattering (GERS) by an electric field under different atmospheres is reported. The GERS spectra of cobalt phthalocyanine (CoPc) molecules were collected by in situ Raman measurements under ambient air, vacuum, NH(3) atmosphere, and O(2) atmosphere, in which the Fermi level of graphene was modulated by an electrical field effect (EFE). The Raman scattering intensities of adsorbed molecules can be tuned to be stronger or weaker as the graphene Fermi level down-shifts or up-shifts under electrical field modulation. However, the Raman intensity modulation in GERS is seriously influenced by the hysteresis effect in graphene EFE, which makes the modulation ability small and shows strong gate voltage sweep rate dependence in ambient air. Fortunately, the hysteresis effect in graphene EFE can be decreased by performing the measurement under vacuum conditions, and thus the Raman modulation ability in GERS can be increased. Furthermore, compared with the vacuum condition, the Raman modulation ability shows an increase under an NH(3) atmosphere, while it shows a decrease under an O(2) atmosphere, which is due to the different Fermi level modulation region in different atmospheres. More interestingly, this Raman intensity modulation in GERS shows a hysteresis-like behavior that is the same as the graphene Fermi level modulation under the EFE in a different atmosphere. All these observations suggest that the Raman enhancement in GERS occurs through a charge-transfer (CT) enhancement mechanism and the CT process can be modulated by the graphene EFE. This technique will benefit the study of the basic properties of both graphene and chemical enhancement mechanism in surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS).

[1]  Hua Xu,et al.  Effect of graphene Fermi level on the Raman scattering intensity of molecules on graphene. , 2011, ACS nano.

[2]  G. Flynn,et al.  Atmospheric oxygen binding and hole doping in deformed graphene on a SiO₂ substrate. , 2010, Nano letters.

[3]  Z. Kim,et al.  Charge transfer enhancement in the SERS of a single molecule. , 2010, Nano letters.

[4]  X. Ling,et al.  First-layer effect in graphene-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2010, Small.

[5]  De‐Yin Wu,et al.  Charge-Transfer Enhancement Involved in the SERS of Adenine on Rh and Pd Demonstrated by Ultraviolet to Visible Laser Excitation , 2010 .

[6]  Jing Kong,et al.  Can graphene be used as a substrate for Raman enhancement? , 2010, Nano letters.

[7]  H. Klauk,et al.  Graphene on a hydrophobic substrate: doping reduction and hysteresis suppression under ambient conditions. , 2009, Nano letters.

[8]  A. Vaskevich,et al.  Raman spectroelectrochemistry of molecules within individual electromagnetic hot spots. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  Kwang S. Kim,et al.  Tuning the graphene work function by electric field effect. , 2009, Nano letters.

[10]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  Graphene as a substrate to suppress fluorescence in resonance Raman spectroscopy. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Duncan R Stewart,et al.  Study of SERS chemical enhancement factors using buffer layer assisted growth of metal nanoparticles on self-assembled monolayers. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  R. Birke,et al.  A unified view of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[13]  Klaus von Klitzing,et al.  Four-terminal magneto-transport in graphene p-n junctions created by spatially selective doping. , 2009, Nano letters.

[14]  Lasse Jensen,et al.  Understanding the molecule-surface chemical coupling in SERS. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Breakdown of the adiabatic Born-Oppenheimer approximation in graphene. , 2007, Nature materials.

[16]  P. Kim,et al.  Electric field effect tuning of electron-phonon coupling in graphene. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[17]  S. Chu,et al.  Improved efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes using CoPc buffer layer , 2006 .

[18]  J. F. Arenas,et al.  Role of the Electrode Potential in the Charge-Transfer Mechanism of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering , 2003 .

[19]  Meng-Sheng Liao,et al.  Electronic structure and bonding in metal phthalocyanines, Metal=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mg , 2001 .

[20]  A. Campion,et al.  Surface-enhanced Raman scattering , 1998 .

[21]  J. Rubim,et al.  Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Study of the Adsorption and Reduction of [M(bipy)3]2+ Complexes (M = Co, Ni) on a Silver Electrode , 1995 .

[22]  Naoki Matsuda,et al.  Charge transfer resonance Raman process in surface-enhanced Raman scattering from p-aminothiophenol adsorbed on silver: Herzberg-Teller contribution , 1994 .

[23]  A. Otto,et al.  SERS — A long-range effect? , 1989 .

[24]  W. Smith,et al.  Phthalocyanines: structure and vibrations , 2001 .