Teaching within the CoderDojo Movement: An Exploration of Mentors’ Teaching Practices

This work in progress reports on the initial findings of a significant study that aims to explore the evolution of programming teaching practice in non-formal, volunteer-led clubs where young people are learning to code. Working together, the mentors and their students create a non-formal learning environment that differs significantly from traditional classroom settings. The specific coding club environment under consideration is that of the CoderDojo Foundation. The study aims to capture the mentors’ teaching practices within the CoderDojo Movement and how this, and other external factors, informs and influences their practice. This paper reports on preliminary analysis of qualitative data gathered through semi-structured interviews with mentors drawn from different programming clubs across the Irish CoderDojo network.

[1]  E. Doyle,et al.  Establishing structured support for programming students , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[2]  M. Huggard,et al.  Peer learning with Lego Mindstorms , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[3]  D. Ugarriza,et al.  The Concept of Theme as Used in Qualitative Nursing Research , 2000, Western journal of nursing research.

[4]  Claudia Szabo,et al.  Can everybody learn to code?: computer science community perceptions about learning the fundamentals of programming , 2014, Koli Calling.

[5]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[6]  R. Brandt,et al.  21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn , 2010 .

[7]  K. DeWalt,et al.  Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers , 2001 .

[8]  S. Kvale,et al.  InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing , 1996 .

[9]  D. Goggin,et al.  EXPLORATION OF LEARNING GAINED THROUGH CODERDOJO CODING ACTIVITIES , 2016 .

[10]  Andrew Begel,et al.  Learning Outside the Classroom , 2019 .

[11]  Natalie Butler,et al.  What Motivates a Ninja? : An exploration of students’ CoderDojo experience , 2018 .

[12]  D. Hunt.  Cognition and Learning , 1989 .

[13]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  Richard Millwood,et al.  A Survey of the Prior Programming Experience of Undergraduate Computing and Engineering Students in Ireland , 2017, WCCE.

[16]  J. Creswell,et al.  Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry , 2000 .

[17]  M. Huggard,et al.  Incentivising students to pursue Computer Science Programmes , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[18]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[19]  Pamela Cowan,et al.  Valence at CoderDojos: An Exploration , 2017 .

[20]  Pamela Cowan,et al.  An Investigation into Tenacity Levels at CoderDojos1 , 2017, Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ..

[21]  Efthimia Aivaloglou,et al.  How is programming taught in code clubs? Exploring the experiences and gender perceptions of code club teachers , 2019, Koli Calling.

[22]  Richard Millwood,et al.  The need for a learning model in coderdojo mentoring practice , 2018, WiPSCE.

[23]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[24]  Francesco Maiorana,et al.  An International Comparison of K-12 Computer Science Education Intended and Enacted Curricula , 2019, Koli Calling.