A Survey on Ethical Principles of AI and Implementations

AI has powerful capabilities in prediction, automation, planning, targeting, and personalisation. Generally, it is assumed that AI can enable machines to exhibit human-like intelligence, and is claimed to benefit to different areas of our lives. Since AI is fueled by data and is a distinct form of autonomous and self-learning agency, we are seeing increasing ethical concerns related to AI uses. In order to mitigate various ethical concerns, national and international organisations including governmental organisations, private sectors as well as research institutes have made extensive efforts by drafting ethical principles of AI, and having active discussions on ethics of AI within and beyond the AI community. This paper investigates these efforts with a focus on the identification of fundamental ethical principles of AI and their implementations. The review found that there is a convergence around limited principles and the most prevalent principles are transparency, justice and fairness, responsibility, non-maleficence, and privacy. The investigation suggests that ethical principles need to be combined with every stages of the AI lifecycle in the implementation to ensure that the AI system is designed, implemented and deployed in an ethical manner. Similar to ethical framework used in biomedical and clinical research, this paper suggests checklist-style questionnaires as benchmarks for the implementation of ethical principles of AI.

[1]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey , 2019, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[2]  L. Floridi,et al.  A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society , 2019, Issue 1.

[3]  Inioluwa Deborah Raji,et al.  Model Cards for Model Reporting , 2018, FAT.

[4]  Michael Chui,et al.  Artificial intelligence: the next digital frontier? , 2017 .

[5]  S. Lo Piano,et al.  Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward , 2020, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.

[6]  Joichi Ito,et al.  Resisting Reduction: A Manifesto , 2017 .

[7]  A. Samuel Some Moral and Technical Consequences of Automation—A Refutation , 1960, Science.

[8]  Ansgar Koene,et al.  IEEE P7003™ standard for algorithmic bias considerations: work in progress paper , 2018 .

[9]  J. Horvat THE ETHICS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , 2016 .

[10]  Amit Dhurandhar,et al.  One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniques , 2019, ArXiv.

[11]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: Australia’s ethics framework , 2019 .

[12]  Kevin B. Korb Ethics of AI , 2007, Encyclopedia of Information Ethics and Security.

[13]  Raja Chatila,et al.  The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems , 2019, Robotics and Well-Being.

[14]  Timnit Gebru,et al.  Datasheets for datasets , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias , 2018, ArXiv.

[16]  N Wiener,et al.  Some moral and technical consequences of automation , 1960, Science.

[17]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  The State of AI Ethics Report (June 2020) , 2020, ArXiv.

[18]  Abhishek Gupta,et al.  The Social Contract for AI , 2020, ArXiv.

[19]  H. Brendan McMahan,et al.  A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedures , 2018, ArXiv.

[20]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  How AI can be a force for good , 2018, Science.

[21]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Raja Chatila,et al.  Designing a Value-Driven Future for Ethical Autonomous and Intelligent Systems , 2019, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  From What to How. An Overview of AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices , 2019, ArXiv.

[24]  R. Rosenfeld,et al.  Ethics , 2008 .

[25]  Jianlong Zhou,et al.  AI in the public interest , 2019 .