Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems.

We describe a flexible computational toolkit, based on object-oriented Bayesian networks, that can be used to model and solve a wide variety of complex problems of relationship testing using DNA profiles. In particular this can account for such complicating features as missing individuals, mutation and null alleles. We illustrate the use of this toolkit with several examples, including disputed paternity with missing or additional measurements, and criminal identification. We investigate the effects on likelihood ratios of introducing mutation and/or null alleles, and show that this can be substantial even when the underlying perturbations are small.

[1]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[2]  Niels Morling,et al.  Paternity Testing Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on genetic investigations in paternity cases. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[3]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks , 1997, UAI.

[4]  L. A. Denton,et al.  Announcement on population data Primer binding site mutations affecting the typing of STR loci contained within the AMPFlSTR 1 SGM Plus TM kit , 2004 .

[5]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  S. Pena,et al.  The mutational spectrum of human autosomal tetranucleotide microsatellites , 2003, Human mutation.

[7]  Christopher Bishop,et al.  Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , 2003 .

[8]  Julia Mortera,et al.  Analysis of DNA mixtures using Bayesian networks , 2003 .

[9]  A. Dawid,et al.  Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Network Fragments: Representing Knowledge for Constructing Probabilistic Models , 1997, UAI.

[11]  Dw Van Boxel,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers , 2002 .

[12]  A P Dawid,et al.  A statistical treatment of biases affecting the estimation of mutation rates. , 2004, Mutation research.

[13]  A J Urquhart,et al.  Primer binding site mutations affecting the typing of STR loci contained within the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus kit. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[14]  Olav Bangsø,et al.  Object Oriented Bayesian Networks: a Framework for Top-Down Specification of Large Bayesian Networks with Repetitive Structures , 2000 .

[15]  A. Philip Dawid,et al.  An object-oriented Bayesian network for estimating mutation rates , 2003, AISTATS.

[16]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science , 2006 .

[17]  A. Philip Dawid,et al.  USING A GRAPHICAL METHOD TO ASSIST THE EVALUATION OF COMPLICATED PATTERNS OF EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[18]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Representing and solving complex DNA identification cases using Bayesian networks , 2006 .

[19]  Anthropologische Gesellschaft in Wien.  Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien , 1871 .

[20]  Ranajit Chakraborty,et al.  Interpreting DNA evidence , 2000 .

[21]  Peter Green,et al.  Highly Structured Stochastic Systems , 2003 .

[22]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[23]  C. Brenner.  Symbolic kinship program. , 1997, Genetics.

[24]  Robert G Cowell.  FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[25]  A. Dawid,et al.  Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[26]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[27]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems , 1999, Information Science and Statistics.

[28]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[29]  T. Dajda,et al.  LR-calculation of any kinship situation using a new graphical interface: Generate two or more hypotheses, draw the family trees and assign the DNA-profiles to person symbols , 2006 .