Talker-specific predictions during language processing
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kara D. Federmeier | Katherine J. Mimnaugh | S. Brown-Schmidt | Shukhan Ng | Rachel Ryskin | Sarah Brown-Schmidt
[1] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Chapter 1 Time for Meaning: Electrophysiology Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Representation and Processing in Semantic Memory , 2009 .
[2] Peter Hagoort,et al. The Neural Integration of Speaker and Message , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[3] Sarah C. Creel. Preschoolers' use of talker information in on-line comprehension. , 2012, Child development.
[4] E. Moreno,et al. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[5] Sarah C. Creel,et al. How Talker Identity Relates to Language Processing , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[6] M. Rugg. The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.
[7] Salim Roukos,et al. Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.
[8] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Pace Yourself: Intraindividual Variability in Context Use Revealed by Self-paced Event-related Brain Potentials , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[9] Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al. Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures , 1998, Biological Psychology.
[10] John K. Kruschke,et al. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan , 2014 .
[11] Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al. Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..
[12] D. Stuss,et al. Electrophysiological manifestations of typicality judgment , 1988, Brain and Language.
[13] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[14] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension , 2010, Brain and Language.
[15] Kathy E. Johnson,et al. Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[16] M. Kutas,et al. Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[17] Sarah C. Creel,et al. Heeding the voice of experience: The role of talker variation in lexical access , 2008, Cognition.
[18] W. Montague,et al. Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .
[19] Karl P. Hunt,et al. Category-item frequency and category-name meaningfulness (m'): Taxonomic norms for 84 categories. , 1971 .
[20] C. Van Petten,et al. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[21] S. Brown-Schmidt,et al. Talker-specific perceptual adaptation during online speech perception , 2012 .
[22] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[23] Dave F. Kleinschmidt,et al. Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. , 2015, Psychological review.
[24] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[25] Gina R Kuperberg,et al. What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[26] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.
[27] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.
[28] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[29] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[30] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .
[31] Marta Kutas,et al. Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[32] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[33] Rachel Ryskin,et al. People as contexts in conversation , 2015 .
[34] Carrie N. Jackson,et al. Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances , 2019, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[35] Andrea Weber,et al. When One Person's Mistake Is Another's Standard Usage: The Effect of Foreign Accent on Syntactic Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] Kara D. Federmeier. Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[37] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension , 2018, eLife.
[38] Douglas L. Nelson,et al. Category Name and Instance Norms for 106 Categories of Various Sizes , 1982 .
[39] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[40] Curt Burgess,et al. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence , 1996 .
[41] D. Dahan,et al. Talker adaptation in speech perception: Adjusting the signal or the representations? , 2008, Cognition.
[42] Sarah C. Creel. Preschoolers’ flexible use of talker information during word learning , 2014 .
[43] Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al. Talker-specific learning in amnesia: Insight into mechanisms of adaptive speech perception , 2014, Cortex.
[44] R. Wang,et al. Listeners use speaker identity to access representations of spatial perspective during online language comprehension , 2016, Cognition.
[45] J. Tanaka,et al. Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] M. Rugg. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.