The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.

Abstract There is substantial evidence that research studies reported in the scientific literature do not provide adequate information so that readers know exactly what was done and what was found. This problem has been addressed by the development of reporting guidelines which tell authors what should be reported and how it should be described. Many reporting guidelines are now available for different types of research designs. There is no such guideline for one type of research design commonly used in the behavioral sciences, the single-case experimental design (SCED). The present study addressed this gap. This report describes the Single-Case Reporting guideline In BEhavioural interventions (SCRIBE) 2016, which is a set of 26 items that authors need to address when writing about SCED research for publication in a scientific journal. Each item is described, a rationale for its inclusion is provided, and examples of adequate reporting taken from the literature are quoted. It is recommended that the SCRIBE 2016 is used by authors preparing manuscripts describing SCED research for publication, as well as journal reviewers and editors who are evaluating such manuscripts.

[1]  H. S. Booker,et al.  Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences , 2020 .

[2]  Jonathan J. Evans,et al.  The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[3]  W. Shadish,et al.  CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: Explanation and elaboration , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  G. Privitera Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. , 2015 .

[6]  Michael Perdices,et al.  Single-Case Experimental Designs , 2014 .

[7]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  Single-Case Intervention Research: Methodological and Statistical Advances , 2014 .

[8]  James E Pustejovsky,et al.  A d-statistic for single-case designs that is equivalent to the usual between-groups d-statistic , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[9]  Leanne Togher,et al.  The design, conduct and report of single-case research: Resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[10]  Keith Smolkowski,et al.  Regression models and effect size measures for single case designs , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[11]  Rumen Manolov,et al.  Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[12]  Justin D. Lane,et al.  Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines , 2014, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[13]  Daniel M. Maggin,et al.  A Comparison of Rubrics for Identifying Empirically Supported Practices with Single-Case Research , 2014 .

[14]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Statistical Analyses of Single-Case Designs , 2014 .

[15]  Daniel M. Maggin,et al.  Evaluating single-case research data for systematic review: a commentary for the special issue. , 2014, Journal of school psychology.

[16]  David L. Gast,et al.  Single Case Research Methodology : Applications in Special Education and Behavioral Sciences , 2014 .

[17]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  The What Works Clearinghouse Single-Case Design Pilot Standards , 2014 .

[19]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Non-overlap analysis for single-case research. , 2014 .

[20]  Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al.  Treatment integrity : a foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology , 2014 .

[21]  John M. Ferron,et al.  Single-case permutation and randomization statistical tests: Present status, promising new developments. , 2014 .

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  Jane Valentine,et al.  Effects of Short-Term Daily Community Walk Aide Use on Children With Unilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy , 2014, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[24]  James E. Pustejovsky,et al.  A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals , 2013, Research synthesis methods.

[25]  R. Melles,et al.  Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a randomized waiting-list control trial of efficacy. , 2013, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[26]  Jonathan J. Evans,et al.  Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International , 2013 .

[27]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions , 2013, Implementation Science.

[28]  J. Wambaugh,et al.  Semantic feature analysis: incorporating typicality treatment and mediating strategy training to promote generalization. , 2013, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[29]  J. Wambaugh,et al.  Modified response elaboration training: application to procedural discourse and personal recounts. , 2013, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[30]  Fahad Alresheed,et al.  Single Subject Research: A Synthesis of Analytic Methods , 2013, The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship.

[31]  D. Rennie,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. , 2013, Annals of internal medicine.

[32]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  PND at 25 , 2013 .

[33]  Jamie B. Barker,et al.  A Review of Single-Case Research in Sport Psychology 1997–2012: Research Trends and Future Directions , 2013 .

[34]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards , 2013 .

[35]  Phill Gagné,et al.  Augmenting Visual Analysis in Single-Case Research With Hierarchical Linear Modeling , 2013, Behavior modification.

[36]  A. Arntz,et al.  Imagery Rescripting as treatment for complicated PTSD in refugees: a multiple baseline case series study. , 2013, Behaviour research and therapy.

[37]  David Moher,et al.  Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[38]  Heiko A. von der Gracht,et al.  Consensus measurement in Delphi studies , 2012 .

[39]  E. Baker Optimal intervention intensity , 2012, International journal of speech-language pathology.

[40]  Justin D. Smith,et al.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[41]  R. D. de Bie,et al.  Feasibility and potential effectiveness of a non-pharmacological multidisciplinary care programme for persons with generalised osteoarthritis: a randomised, multiple-baseline single-case study , 2012, BMJ Open.

[42]  Christina L. Boisseau,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for perinatal grief. , 2012 .

[43]  A. Cann Replication , 2003, Principles of Molecular Virology.

[44]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  When the truth hits you between the eyes: A software tool for the visual analysis of single-case experimental data , 2012 .

[45]  Elizabeth M. Pratt,et al.  Alliance-focused therapy for anorexia nervosa: integrative relational and behavioral change treatments in a single-case experimental design. , 2011, Psychotherapy.

[46]  Daniel M. Maggin,et al.  A systematic evaluation of token economies as a classroom management tool for students with challenging behavior. , 2011, Journal of school psychology.

[47]  R. Kravitz,et al.  N-of-1 Trials in the Medical Literature: A Systematic Review , 2011, Medical care.

[48]  Iveta Simera,et al.  Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[49]  W. Shadish,et al.  Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008 , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[50]  Jennifer R. Ledford,et al.  Single-Case Experimental Methods , 2011 .

[51]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. , 2011, Behavior therapy.

[52]  Su Golder,et al.  Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[53]  Daniel M. Maggin,et al.  A Quantitative Synthesis of Methodology in the Meta-Analysis of Single-Subject Research for Students with Disabilities: 1985–2009 , 2011 .

[54]  Jamie B. Barker,et al.  Single-Case Research Methods in Sport and Exercise Psychology , 2011 .

[55]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[56]  N. Cooke,et al.  Using a Repeated Reading Program to Improve Generalization of Oral Reading Fluency , 2011 .

[57]  Timothy J Feeney,et al.  Structured Flexibility: The Use of Context-Sensitive Self-regulatory Scripts to Support Young Persons with Acquired Brain Injury and Behavioral Difficulties , 2010, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[58]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Designs Technical Documentation. , 2010 .

[59]  J. Levin,et al.  Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: randomization to the rescue. , 2010, Psychological methods.

[60]  Diana Hammond,et al.  Descriptive Analysis of Single Subject Research Designs: 1983-2007. , 2010 .

[61]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMC medicine.

[62]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[63]  Hildur Valdimarsdóttir,et al.  Increasing the variety of foods consumed by a picky eater: generalization of effects across caregivers and settings. , 2010, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[64]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings , 2010 .

[65]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[66]  D. Moher,et al.  A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research , 2010, European journal of clinical investigation.

[67]  David L. Gast,et al.  Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences , 2010 .

[68]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. , 2009, Behavior therapy.

[69]  Keith D. White,et al.  Regional changes in word-production laterality after a naming treatment designed to produce a rightward shift in frontal activity , 2009, Brain and Language.

[70]  Michael Perdices,et al.  Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued? , 2009, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[71]  D. Gast,et al.  Ethical Principles and Practices , 2009 .

[72]  L. Cohen,et al.  A token economy for exercise adherence in pediatric cystic fibrosis: a single-subject analysis. , 2009, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[73]  T. Morris,et al.  Alleviating Choking: The Sounds of Distraction , 2009 .

[74]  David J. Chard,et al.  Repeated Reading Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities: Status of the Evidence , 2009 .

[75]  Matthew K. Burns,et al.  Evaluating Educational Interventions: Single-Case Design for Measuring Response to Intervention , 2009 .

[76]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  The Improvement Rate Difference for Single-Case Research , 2009 .

[77]  J. Sterne,et al.  meta-epidemiological study interventions and outcomes: estimates in controlled trials with different Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect , 2009 .

[78]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Therapist-aided exposure for women with lifelong vaginismus: a replicated single-case design. , 2009, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[79]  W. Shadish,et al.  The state of the science in the meta-analysis of single-case experimental designs , 2008 .

[80]  S. Natasha Beretvas,et al.  A review of meta-analyses of single-subject experimental designs: Methodological issues and practice , 2008 .

[81]  David Morgan,et al.  Single-Case Research Methods for the Behavioral and Health Sciences , 2008 .

[82]  Carl Heneghan,et al.  What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[83]  Leanne Togher,et al.  Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale , 2008, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[84]  Miranda L. Rose,et al.  The effects of semantic and gesture treatments on verb retrieval and verb use in aphasia , 2008 .

[85]  H. Wright,et al.  Using a written cueing hierarchy to improve verbal naming in aphasia , 2008 .

[86]  R. C. Marshall,et al.  Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia. , 2008, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[87]  S. Sismondo How Pharmaceutical Industry Funding Affects Trial Outcomes: Causal Structures and Responses , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[88]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[89]  Sergio Sismondo,et al.  Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences: a qualitative systematic review. , 2008, Contemporary clinical trials.

[90]  D. Moher,et al.  Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. , 2008, Annals of internal medicine.

[91]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[92]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[93]  M. Wolery,et al.  Describing Baseline Conditions: Suggestions for Study Reports , 2007 .

[94]  Andrew Herxheimer,et al.  Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[95]  David Moher,et al.  Reporting Methods of Blinding in Randomized Trials Assessing Nonpharmacological Treatments , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[96]  S. Warren,et al.  Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. , 2007, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[97]  T. Kratochwill,et al.  Treatment Integrity in Behavioral Consultation: Measurement, Promotion, and Outcomes , 2007 .

[98]  Randall R. Robey,et al.  Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature , 2006, Neuropsychology Review.

[99]  R. Tate,et al.  The Evidence Base of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation in Acquired Brain Impairment (ABI): How Good is the Research? , 2006, Brain Impairment.

[100]  Linda C. Mechling,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Three Approaches on the Frequency of Stimulus Activations, via a Single Switch, by Students With Profound Intellectual Disabilities , 2006 .

[101]  Hubert Korzilius,et al.  Behavioral treatment of challenging behaviors in individuals with mild mental retardation: meta-analysis of single-subject research. , 2006, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[102]  John P.A. Ioannidis,et al.  Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[103]  J. Vandenbroucke What is the best evidence for determining harms of medical treatment? , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[104]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials evaluating herbal interventions: implementing the CONSORT statement [corrected]. , 2006, Explore.

[105]  Barbara Resnick,et al.  A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[106]  Laurie A. Ehlhardt,et al.  TEACH-M: A pilot study evaluating an instructional sequence for persons with impaired memory and executive functions , 2005, Brain injury.

[107]  J. E. Carr Recommendations for reporting multiple‐baseline designs across participants , 2005 .

[108]  M. Wolery,et al.  The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education , 2005 .

[109]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  Customization of pain treatments: single-case design and analysis. , 2005, The Clinical journal of pain.

[110]  K. Heilman,et al.  Active treatments for aprosodia secondary to right hemisphere stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[111]  R. Miltenberger,et al.  Evaluation of behavioral skills training to prevent gun play in children. , 2004, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[112]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[113]  Craig H. Kennedy,et al.  Single-Case Designs for Educational Research , 2004 .

[114]  Effects of training volunteers to converse with nursing home residents with aphasia , 2004 .

[115]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[116]  Heejung Bang,et al.  Assessment of blinding in clinical trials. , 2004, Controlled clinical trials.

[117]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[118]  John M. Hintze,et al.  Evaluating Teacher Modeling as a Strategy to Increase Student Reading Behavior , 2003 .

[119]  R. Tallis,et al.  Use of a randomised single case experimental design to evaluate therapy for unilateral neglect , 2003 .

[120]  B. Djulbegovic,et al.  Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[121]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  Evaluating Single-Case Research Data: A Comparison of Seven Statistical Methods , 2003 .

[122]  C. Gross,et al.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[123]  J. Ducharme,et al.  Treatment of Oppositional Behavior in Children of Parents with Brain Injury and Chronic Pain , 2002 .

[124]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what , 2002, The Lancet.

[125]  M. Dijkers,et al.  Quality of Intervention Research Reporting in Medical Rehabilitation Journals , 2002, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[126]  G R Marsh,et al.  Cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment of chronic primary insomnia: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[127]  J. Vlaeyen,et al.  Graded exposure in vivo in the treatment of pain-related fear: a replicated single-case experimental design in four patients with chronic low back pain. , 2001, Behaviour research and therapy.

[128]  Randall R. Robey,et al.  Review: Single-subject clinical-outcome research: designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses , 1999 .

[129]  S. Hayes,et al.  The Scientist Practitioner: Research and Accountability in the Age of Managed Care , 1999 .

[130]  Andrew V. Dane,et al.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control? , 1998, Clinical psychology review.

[131]  B. Goldwater,et al.  A PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR AN INTERNATIONAL‐LEVEL TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETE , 1997 .

[132]  D H Barlow,et al.  A systematic replication of the prescriptive treatment of school refusal behavior in a single subject. , 1996, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[133]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[134]  E S Edgington,et al.  Randomized single-subject experimental designs. , 1996, Behaviour research and therapy.

[135]  T. J. Page,et al.  Functional analysis: Identifying the environmental determinants of severe behavior disorders , 1996 .

[136]  Patrick Onghena,et al.  The power of randomization tests for single-case phase designs , 1996 .

[137]  D. Jeffery Higginbotham,et al.  Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points , 1995 .

[138]  Procedural fidelity: A reminder of its functions , 1994 .

[139]  J Ferron,et al.  Using randomization tests with responsive single-case designs. , 1994, Behaviour research and therapy.

[140]  Joel Fischer,et al.  Evaluating Practice: Guidelines for the Accountable Professional , 1994 .

[141]  M. Wolery,et al.  Effects of two levels of procedural fidelity with constant time delay on children's learning , 1994 .

[142]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Efficacy of AAC interventions: Methodologic issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects , 1994 .

[143]  M. Wolery,et al.  Subject Descriptions and Single-Subject Research , 1993, Journal of learning disabilities.

[144]  W W Tryon,et al.  Estimating and testing autocorrelation with small samples: a comparison of the C-statistic to a modified estimator. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[145]  B. Gorman,et al.  Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: the case of the single case. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[146]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[147]  Curtis H. Krishef,et al.  Fundamental approaches to single subject design and analysis , 1991 .

[148]  J. Buchan Differential treatment? , 1990, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[149]  K B Haller,et al.  Single Case Research , 1989, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[150]  S. Raman N of 1 randomized controlled trials. , 1988, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[151]  L. O'Shea,et al.  Using Repeated Reading , 1988 .

[152]  C Duffield,et al.  The Delphi technique. , 1988, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[153]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[154]  C K Thompson,et al.  Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: Using flexibility to design or modify experiments. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[155]  Donald M. Baer,et al.  The Graphic Analysis of Data , 1986 .

[156]  Ann Casey,et al.  A Methodology for the Quantitative Synthesis of Intra-Subject Design Research , 1985 .

[157]  M. E. Boyle Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1983 .

[158]  Steven C. Hayes,et al.  Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings : by A.E. Kazdin Oxford University Press, New York, 1982 , 1983 .

[159]  R. Gorsuch Three methods for analyzing limited time-series (N of 1) data. , 1983 .

[160]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-case experimental designs in clinical research and practice. , 1982 .

[161]  W. Tryon,et al.  A simplified time-series analysis for evaluating treatment interventions. , 1982, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[162]  E. Edgington Validity of Randomization Tests for one-Subject Experiments , 1980 .

[163]  John M. Gottman,et al.  4 – Analysis of Interrupted Time-Series Experiments , 1978 .

[164]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[165]  Michael D. Geurts,et al.  Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control , 1977 .

[166]  R. Senf Tactics of Scientific Research: Evaluating Experimental Data in Psychology , 1962 .

[167]  M. Sidman,et al.  Tactics of scientific research : evaluating experimental data in psychology , 1961 .

[168]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[169]  Frank Wilcoxon,et al.  Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. , 1947 .

[170]  F. Wilcoxon,et al.  Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. , 1947, Biometrics.

[171]  M. Friedman The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[172]  R. Fisher A mathematical Examination of the Methods of determining the Accuracy of Observation by the Mean Error, and by the Mean Square Error , 1920 .

[173]  Student,et al.  THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN , 1908 .