Metallic neurosurgical implants: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5‐Tesla

The purpose of this study was to use ex vivo testing to determine the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety aspects for seven different metallic neurosurgical implants in association with the 1.5‐T MR environment. Ex vivo testing was performed using previously‐described techniques for the evaluation of magnetic field interactions (deflection angle and torque), heating (gel‐filled phantom and fluoroptic thermometry; 15 minutes of MRI at a specific absorption rate [SAR] of 1.4 W/kg), and artifacts (using T1‐weighted, spin‐echo and gradient‐echo pulse sequences). None of the metallic implants displayed interactions with the magnetic field. The highest temperature change was +0.6°C for the representative implant that was evaluated. Artifacts were relatively minor. The lack of magnetic field interactions and negligible heating indicate that MR procedures may be conducted safely in patients with these neurosurgical implants using MR systems with static magnetic fields of 1.5‐T or less. Furthermore, these implants may be considered for use in interventional MR procedures insofar as the MR safe qualities and relatively small artifacts would likely be desirable for such procedures. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;14:295–299. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  S. Karlik,et al.  Early identification of sites of embryo implantation in rats by means of gadolinium‐enhanced MR imaging , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  F G Shellock,et al.  Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  F G Shellock,et al.  Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Compatible instrumentation for intraoperative MRI: expanding resources. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  J S Lewin,et al.  Intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance in neurosurgery , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  F. Jolesz,et al.  Invited. Compatible instrumentation for intraoperative MRI: Expanding resources , 1998 .

[7]  W S Hinshaw,et al.  Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1983, Radiology.

[8]  F G Shellock,et al.  High-field-strength MR imaging and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  G. P. Graber,et al.  Heating near implanted medical devices by the MRI RF-magnetic field , 1999 .

[10]  E Kanal,et al.  Aneurysm clips: effects of long-term and multiple exposures to a 1.5-T MR system. , 1999, Radiology.

[11]  F G Shellock,et al.  Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: Evaluation of MR safety , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R. Klucznik,et al.  Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome. , 1993, Radiology.

[13]  F G Shellock,et al.  Cranial bone flap fixation clamps: compatibility at MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  Frank G. Shellock,et al.  Hr imaging and vascular access ports: Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 t , 1995 .

[15]  F G Shellock,et al.  Prosthetic heart valves: Evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  F. Shellock,et al.  Ex Vivo Evaluation of Ferromagnetism, Heating, and Artifacts of Breast Tissue Expanders Exposed to a 1.5‐T MR System , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  T. W. Athey,et al.  Heating Near Implanted Medical Devices by the MRI RF-magnetic Field , 1999, IEEE International Magnetics Conference.

[18]  F. Jolesz,et al.  1996 RSNA Eugene P. Pendergrass New Horizons Lecture. Image-guided procedures and the operating room of the future. , 1997, Radiology.

[19]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[20]  J. McDougall,et al.  RF heating of implanted spinal fusion stimulator during magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  E Kanal,et al.  Aneurysm clips: evaluation of MR imaging artifacts at 1.5 T. , 1998, Radiology.

[22]  F G Shellock,et al.  Radiofrequency Energy‐Induced Heating During MR Procedures: A Review , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.