The comparison of joint kinematic error using the absolute and relative coordinate systems for human gait

Minimizing artifacts from skin movement is vital for acquiring more accurate kinematic data in human movement analysis. There are several stages that cause skin movement artifacts and these stages depend on the selection of the reference system, the error reduction method and the coordinate system in clinical gait analysis. Due to residual errors, which are applied to the Euler and Bryant angle methods in each stage, significant cumulative errors are generated in the motion analysis procedure. Thus, there is currently a great deal of research focusing on reducing kinematic errors through error reduction methods and kinematic error estimations in relation to the reference system. However, there have been no studies that have systematically examined the effects of the selected coordinate system on the estimation of kinematic errors, because most of these previous studies have been mainly concerned with the analysis of human movement using only the human models that are provided in the commercial 3D motion capture systems.Therefore, we have estimated the differences between the results of human movement analyses using an absolute coordinate system and a relative coordinate system during a gait, in order to establish which system provides a more accurate kinematic analysis at the ankle joint. Six normal adult subjects with no neurological or orthopedic conditions, lower extremity injuries, or recent history of lower extremity surgery were used in this study. The analysis was conducted at a walking speed of 1.35m/s. For the clinical estimation, we used a cardinal plane based on the segmental reference system and the differences were plotted on the planes. From this analysis, when a relative coordinate system was in the gait analysis, the average kinematic error occurring during the gait was determined to be 13.58mm, which was significantly higher than the error generated with an absolute coordinate system. Therefore, although the relative coordinate system can also be used to calculate the ankle joint center during the clinical gait analysis, the absolute coordinate system should be employed in order to obtain more accurate joint kinematic data. In addition, the results from this study can be used as a basis to select an appropriate coordinate system with regards to the diagnostic accuracy level required for various kinds of gait disorders.

[1]  C. Spoor,et al.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J. Apkarian,et al.  A three-dimensional kinematic and dynamic model of the lower limb. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[5]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  R. Huston,et al.  Use of absolute coordinates in computational multibody dynamics , 1994 .

[8]  J H Challis,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining body segment attitude and position from noisy biomechanical data. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  H J Grootenboer,et al.  An inverse dynamics model for the analysis, reconstruction and prediction of bipedal walking. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  R. Craik,et al.  Gait analysis : theory and application , 1995 .

[11]  B. Fregly,et al.  A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  A Cappello,et al.  Optimization and smoothing techniques in movement analysis. , 1996, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[14]  A. J. van den Bogert,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Frigo,et al.  Multifactorial estimation of hip and knee joint centres for clinical application of gait analysis. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[16]  J J O'Connor,et al.  Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Dan Karlsson,et al.  On skin movement artefact-resonant frequencies of skin markers attached to the leg , 1999 .

[18]  E V Biryukova,et al.  Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking system recordings. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  P Mansat,et al.  Morphological and mechanical analysis of the glenoid by 3D geometric reconstruction using computed tomography. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[20]  B J McFadyen,et al.  A method of measuring three-dimensional scapular attitudes using the optotrak probing system. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  J. Mun.  A New Experimental Error Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Human Motion Analysis , 2001 .

[22]  D. Sutherland.  The evolution of clinical gait analysis. Part II kinematics. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[23]  Joung Hwan Mun.  A method for the reduction of skin marker artifacts during walking : Application to the knee , 2003 .

[24]  Å. Bartonek,et al.  Characteristic gait kinematics in persons with lumbosacral myelomeningocele. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[25]  Jinjun Xiong,et al.  Model-guided derivation of lumbar vertebral kinematics in vivo reveals the difference between external marker-defined and internal segmental rotations. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Ken Ikeuchi,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical condition of articular cartilage with an ultrasonic probe: quantitative evaluation using wavelet transformation. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  J. Mun,et al.  Three-dimensional contact dynamic model of the human knee joint during walking , 2004 .

[28]  Steven J Stanhope,et al.  Joint moment control of mechanical energy flow during normal gait. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[29]  I. Charlton,et al.  Repeatability of an optimised lower body model. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[30]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Non-invasive approach towards the in vivo estimation of 3D inter-vertebral movements: methods and preliminary results. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  Jaco F Schutte,et al.  Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Joung Hwan Mun,et al.  A position based kinematic method for the analysis of human gait , 2005 .

[33]  Brian Smith,et al.  Gait initiation in children with cerebral palsy. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[34]  Jon Trevelyan,et al.  Development of an instrumented pole test for use as a gait laboratory quality check. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[35]  J F Orr,et al.  Gait kinematics of age-stratified hip replacement patients--a large scale, long-term follow-up study. , 2008, Gait & posture.