Models For Locating RFID Nodes

Localization of randomly distributed wireless sensor nodes is a significant and fundamental problem in a broad range of emerging civil engineering applications. Densely deployed in physical environments, they are envisioned to form ad hoc communication networks and provide the sensed data without relying on a fixed communications infrastructure. To establish ad hoc communication networks among wireless sensor nodes, it is useful and sometimes necessary to determine sensors positions in static and dynamic sensor arrays. As well, the location of sensor nodes becomes of immediate use if construction resources, such as materials and components, are to be tracked. Tracking the location of construction resources enables effortless progress monitoring and supports real-time construction state sensing. This paper compares several models for localizing RFID nodes on construction job sites. They range from those based on triangulation with reference to transmission space maps, to roving RFID reader and tag systems using multiple proximity constraints, to approaches for processing uncertainty and imprecision in proximity measurements. They are compared qualitatively on the basis of cost, flexibility, scalability, computational complexity, ability to manage uncertainty and imprecision, and ability to handle dynamic sensor arrays. Results of field experiments and simulations are also presented where applicable.

[1]  Yanwei Wang,et al.  Relative location in wireless networks , 2001, IEEE VTS 53rd Vehicular Technology Conference, Spring 2001. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37202).

[2]  William C. Stone,et al.  Architecture for Discrete Construction Component Tracking , 1999 .

[3]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Locating Materials on Construction Site Using Proximity Techniques , 2005 .

[4]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Building Project Model Support for Automated Labor Monitoring , 2003 .

[5]  Damodara U. Kini Materials Management: The Key to Successful Project Management , 1999 .

[6]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  The Transferable Belief Model , 1991, ECSQARU.

[7]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[8]  Gaetano Borriello Location Sensing Techniques , 2001 .

[9]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  SpotON: An Indoor 3D Location Sensing Technology Based on RF Signal Strength , 2000 .

[10]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[11]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Automating the task of tracking the delivery and receipt of fabricated pipe spools in industrial projects , 2006 .

[12]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  A Generalization of Bayesian Inference , 1968, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[13]  François Peyret,et al.  Asphalt Quality Parameters Tracability Using Electronic Tags and GPS , 2002 .

[14]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  A proximity-based method for locating RFID tagged objects , 2007, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Framework for Providing Customized Data Representations for Effective and Efficient Interaction with Mobile Computing Solutions on Construction Sites , 2005 .

[16]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Frontiers in sensors and sensing systems , 2005 .

[17]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Robust Mobile Ad Hoc Space for Collaboration to Support Disaster Relief Efforts Involving Critical Physical Infrastructure , 2006 .

[18]  Ronie Navon,et al.  Can Labor Inputs be Measured and Controlled Automatically , 2003 .

[19]  Edward J. Jaselskis,et al.  Implementing Radio Frequency Identification in the Construction Process , 2003 .

[20]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[21]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Pull-Driven Scheduling for Pipe-Spool Installation: Simulation of Lean Construction Technique , 1998 .