IUDs as EC? Limited awareness and high reported acceptability: evidence from Argentina.

[1]  E. Westley,et al.  Knowledge and use of emergency contraception: a multicountry analysis. , 2014, International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health.

[2]  D. Wojdyla,et al.  Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[3]  D. Mansour,et al.  Improving uptake of the copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception by educating pharmacists in the community , 2013, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[4]  J. Fortin,et al.  Acceptability of the IUD among women who opted out of a randomized controlled trial of intracesarean insertion of the copper-T 380A in Kampala, Uganda , 2012 .

[5]  J. Trussell,et al.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[6]  G. Brock,et al.  Retrospective review of intrauterine device in adolescent and young women. , 2011, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology.

[7]  Rachel L. Wright,et al.  A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users' willingness to select the copper IUD. , 2012, Contraception.

[8]  J. Stephenson,et al.  What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study , 2011, The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception.

[9]  S. Simonsen,et al.  A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the copper IUD? , 2011, Contraception.

[10]  Víctor Becerril-Montekio,et al.  Sistema de salud de Argentina , 2011 .

[11]  C. Morroni,et al.  Survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding the intrauterine device in South Africa. , 2011, Contraception.

[12]  K. Curtis,et al.  U S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010 : adapted from the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 4th edition , 2010 .

[13]  Ministro Del Interior,et al.  ENCUESTA SOBRE MIGRACIÓN, FECUNDIDAD Y FAMILIA (EMFF 2011) , 2011 .

[14]  M. Pecheny.  Emergency contraception in Argentina: Grey areas of common sense and public policy , 2010, Global public health.

[15]  C. Morroni,et al.  A survey to assess knowledge and acceptability of the intrauterine device in the Family Planning Services in Cape Town, South Africa , 2010, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[16]  M. Cremer,et al.  Acceptability of the intrauterine device among women in El Salvador , 2010, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[17]  E. Schwarz,et al.  Interest in Intrauterine Contraception Among Seekers of Emergency Contraception and Pregnancy Testing , 2009, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  Lisa M. Johnson,et al.  Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. , 2008, Contraception.

[19]  Sue Wilson,et al.  What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study , 2006, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[20]  B. Janowitz,et al.  Reasons for the Low Level of IUD Use in El Salvador , 2002 .

[21]  J. Forrest.  U.S. women's perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD. , 1996, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[22]  W. Pratt,et al.  Contraceptive use in the United States, 1973–1988 , 1990 .

[23]  H. Fritsches,et al.  [Intrauterine devices (IUDS): infections and other complications] , 1990 .

[24]  T. Malik,et al.  The postcoital copper-T. , 1976, Advances in planned parenthood.

[25]  J. Raboch,et al.  [Intrauterine contraceptives]. , 1965, Ceskoslovenska gynekologie.