Social Aggregation Rules and Continuity
暂无分享,去创建一个
It is shown that any continuous social aggregation rule for smooth preferences cannot simultaneously satisfy the properties of anonymity and respect of unanimity. This is true even when all individual preferences are linear. The relationship between the conditions on the social rule studied here and those of Arrow's paradox is discussed. The first result requires that the normalized gradient of the social choice rule be definable in the interior of the choice space, thus indicating a direction of increase of social preference. A second impossibility result extends the first to cases where the gradient of the social preference may vanish in the interior of the choice space.
[1] Rubin Saposnik. SOCIAL CHOICE WITH CONTINUOUS EXPRESSION OF INDIVIDUAL PREFERENCES , 1975 .
[2] K. Arrow. A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.
[3] The Continuous Representation of a Social Preference Ordering , 1971 .