Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts With Endothelium Outward: A Cross-Country Validation Study of the DMEK Rapid Device.

PURPOSE To validate the "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Rapid" device for the cross-country transportation of preloaded DMEK grafts preserved with endothelium outward. METHODS DMEK grafts were stripped and loaded in the DMEK Rapid device with tissue culture medium (TCM) or transport medium (TM) with endothelium outward. The device was mounted in a 40-mL flask and preserved for 4 days on a rocker to simulate transportation (study A, n = 24) or shipped in the TM from Italy to the United Kingdom (study B, n = 9) and evaluated within 72 hours. All the tissues were stained with Alizarin red. Viability of the cells was checked postsimulations and posttransportation and was confirmed using live/dead staining. Expression of tight junction proteins was evaluated. RESULTS In study A, the endothelial cell loss observed from the TCM group was 20.8% (±5.2) compared with 19.5% (±6.7) from the TM group (P = 0.41) after transport simulation. Alizarin red showed minimal uncovered areas in both groups. There were no statistical differences in viability between the TM (80.83%) and TCM groups (78.83%). In study B, 12.9% (±7.8) endothelial cell loss was observed after transporting the tissues from Italy to the United Kingdom with no significant difference between prestrip and posttransportation (P = 0.05). Alizarin red staining did not show any uncovered area. Live/dead analysis showed 85.16% cell viability after transportation. zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) was expressed in all tissues. CONCLUSIONS The DMEK Rapid device is safe for preloading and shipping DMEK grafts internationally with endothelium outward within 72 hours when preserved in the transport media.

[1]  P. Szurman,et al.  Comparison of preloaded grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a novel preloaded transport cartridge compared to conventional precut grafts , 2020, Cell and Tissue Banking.

[2]  Mehrnaz Ighani,et al.  Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2019, Cornea.

[3]  N. Durr,et al.  Comparison of Tri-folded and Scroll-based Graft Viability in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2018, Cornea.

[4]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Cross-Country Transportation Efficacy and Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Large-Diameter Ultra-Thin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts , 2018, Cornea.

[5]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Clinical Outcomes of Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts With Endothelium Tri-Folded Inwards. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Learning Curve for Graft Preparation in an Eye Bank Using 645 Donor Corneas , 2018, Cornea.

[7]  D. DeMill,et al.  Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Donor Tissue: Surgical Technique and Early Clinical Results , 2018, Cornea.

[8]  David A. Price,et al.  Five-Year Graft Survival of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet Stripping EK and the Effect of Donor Sex Matching. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[9]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Fish Scale-Derived Scaffolds for Culturing Human Corneal Endothelial Cells , 2018, Stem cells international.

[10]  A. Shortt,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Standardizing Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Method in the Eye Bank—Experience of 527 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissues , 2017, Cornea.

[12]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Comparison of preservation and transportation protocols for preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2017, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  Maria A. Woodward,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Endothelial Cell Loss in Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts , 2017, Cornea.

[14]  Christopher G. Stoeger,et al.  Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Prestripped, Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts , 2017, Cornea.

[15]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Endothelium‐in versus endothelium‐out for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft preparation and implantation , 2017, Acta ophthalmologica.

[16]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Preservation of Preloaded DMEK Lenticules in Dextran and Non-Dextran-Based Organ Culture Medium , 2016, Journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Preloaded Tissues for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  P. Szurman,et al.  Novel liquid bubble dissection technique for DMEK lenticule preparation , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Preloaded donor corneal lenticules in a new validated 3D printed smart storage glide for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue preparation from donor corneas using a standardized submerged hydro-separation method. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Maria A Woodward,et al.  Eye-bank preparation of endothelial tissue , 2014, Current opinion in ophthalmology.