Plume detection modeling of a drone-based natural gas leak detection system

Interest has grown in using new screening technologies such as drones to search for methane leaks in hydrocarbon production infrastructure. Screening technologies may be less expensive and faster than traditional methods. However, including new technologies in emissions monitoring programs requires an accurate understanding of what leaks a system will detect and the resultant emissions mitigation. Here we examine source detection of a drone-based system with controlled releases. We examine different detection algorithm parameters to understand trade-offs between false positive rate and detection probability. Leak detection was poor under all conditions with an average detection probability of 0.21. Detection probability was not affected by emission rate, suggesting similar systems may commonly miss large leaks. Detection was best in moderate wind speeds and at 750–2000 m downwind from the source where the plume had diffused vertically above the minimum flight level of 40–50 m. Predicted concentration enhancement from a Gaussian plume model was a reasonable predictor of detection within the test suite. Enabling lower flight elevations may increase detection probability. Overall, the experiments suggest that controlled releases are useful and necessary to provide an understanding of detection probability of screening technologies for regulatory and deployment purposes, and the testing must be representative to support broad application.

[1]  W. Landman Climate change 2007: the physical science basis , 2010 .

[2]  Clay S. Bell,et al.  "Good versus Good Enough?" Empirical Tests of Methane Leak Detection Sensitivity of a Commercial Infrared Camera. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Chris H. Hugenholtz,et al.  A UAV-based system for detecting natural gas leaks , 2017 .

[4]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Super-emitters in natural gas infrastructure are caused by abnormal process conditions , 2017, Nature Communications.

[5]  Eben D Thoma,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from oil and gas production pads using mobile measurements. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Designing better methane mitigation policies: the challenge of distributed small sources in the natural gas sector , 2017 .

[7]  David John Lary,et al.  Near-Field Characterization of Methane Emission Variability from a Compressor Station Using a Model Aircraft. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  C. Hugenholtz,et al.  A review of close-range and screening technologies for mitigating fugitive methane emissions in upstream oil and gas , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[9]  Silvia Ferrari,et al.  A Mobile Sensing Approach for Regional Surveillance of Fugitive Methane Emissions in Oil and Gas Production. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Matthew R. Johnson,et al.  A methane emissions reduction equivalence framework for alternative leak detection and repair programs , 2019, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.

[11]  Zachary D. Weller,et al.  Vehicle-Based Methane Surveys for Finding Natural Gas Leaks and Estimating Their Size: Validation and Uncertainty. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  M. Omara,et al.  Methane Emissions from Natural Gas Production Sites in the United States: Data Synthesis and National Estimate. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Clay S. Bell,et al.  Single-blind inter-comparison of methane detection technologies – results from the Stanford/EDF Mobile Monitoring Challenge , 2019, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.

[14]  Seth B C Shonkoff,et al.  Hazardous Air Pollutants Associated with Upstream Oil and Natural Gas Development: A Critical Synthesis of Current Peer-Reviewed Literature. , 2019, Annual review of public health.

[15]  Adam R. Brandt,et al.  Comparing Natural Gas Leakage Detection Technologies Using an Open-Source "Virtual Gas Field" Simulator. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Sam Chamberlain,et al.  Rapid, Vehicle-Based Identification of Location and Magnitude of Urban Natural Gas Pipeline Leaks. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  S. Bhatia,et al.  The Ginninderra CH4 and CO2 release experiment: An evaluation of gas detection and quantification techniques , 2018 .

[18]  D. Risk,et al.  Mobile measurement of methane emissions from natural gas developments in northeastern British Columbia, Canada , 2017 .

[19]  D. Zavala-Araiza,et al.  Methane emissions in the Netherlands: The Groningen field , 2018 .

[20]  Daniel Cooley,et al.  Methane Leaks from Natural Gas Systems Follow Extreme Distributions. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  M. Omara,et al.  Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain , 2018, Science.