An Overview on Systems and Algorithms for On-Board 3D/4D Trajectory Management

In recent years, significant emphasis has been devoted to progresses in the field of on-board trajectory generation and tracking for aircraft guidance along specified waypoints. Research in this area was mainly driven by the request of improved on-board autonomy for both unmanned aerial systems and manned civil aircrafts. Several algorithms and systems have been developed and patented in this field, addressing both 3D waypoints, which are specified in terms of their three dimensional coordinates and, more recently, 4D waypoints, which also include a required time to arrival. Of course, patents proposed for 3D/4D trajectory management systems are characterized by their key features (use of 3D or 4D constraints, of different waypoint capture concepts, and so on) and by different applications and algorithms. In this paper, a review is performed of the most relevant patents presented in recent years in this field. This review considers the various problems, emphasizing main advantages and weaknesses of the proposed solutions and suggesting some possible future developments.

[1]  P. Riseborough,et al.  Automatic take-off and landing control for small UAVs , 2004, 2004 5th Asian Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04EX904).

[2]  M. Pachter,et al.  Challenges of autonomous control , 1998 .

[3]  G. Ambrosino,et al.  Algorithms for 3D UAV Path Generation and Tracking , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Jih-Gau Juang,et al.  Intelligent automatic landing system using fuzzy neural networks and genetic algorithm , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[5]  Jih-Gau Juang,et al.  Automatic landing control using particle swarm optimization , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, 2005. ICM '05..

[6]  Norihiko Adachi,et al.  An intelligent landing system based on a human skill model , 1998 .

[7]  U. Ciniglio,et al.  An optimal 3D analytical solution for collision avoidance between aircraft , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[8]  Rolf Rysdyk,et al.  UAV Path Following for Constant Line-of-Sight , 2003 .

[9]  G. Berz,et al.  Study of the required time of arrival function of current FMS in an ATM context , 2007, 2007 IEEE/AIAA 26th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[10]  S. M. Malaek,et al.  Flight Envelope Expansion in Landing Phase Using Classic, Intelligent and Adaptive Controllers , 2006 .