Negative per capita effects of purple loosestrife and reed canary grass on plant diversity of wetland communities

Invasive plants can simplify plant community structure, alter ecosystem processes and undermine the ecosystem services that we derive from biotic diversity. Two invasive plants, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), are becoming the dominant species in many wetlands across temperate North America. We used a horizontal, observational study to estimate per capita effects (PCEs) of purple loosestrife and reed canary grass on plant diversity in 24 wetland communities in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Four measures of diversity were used: the number of species (S), evenness of relative abundance (J), the Shannon-Wiener index (H') and Simpson's index (D). We show that (1) the PCEs on biotic diversity were similar for both invasive species among the four measures of diversity we examined; (2) the relationship between plant diversity and invasive plant abundance ranges from linear (constant slope) to negative exponential (variable slope), the latter signifying that the PCEs are density-dependent; (3) the PCEs were density-dependent for measures of diversity sensitive to the number of species (S, H', D) but not for the measure that relied solely upon relative abundance (J); and (4) invader abundance was not correlated with other potential influences on biodiversity (hydrology, soils, topography). These results indicate that both species are capable of reducing plant community diversity, and management strategies need to consider the simultaneous control of multiple species if the goal is to maintain diverse plant communities.

[1]  Bernd Blossey,et al.  Impact and management of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[2]  M. Louhaichi,et al.  Creating low-cost high-resolution digital elevation models , 2003 .

[3]  S. Bridgham,et al.  A comparison of nutrient availability indices along an ombrotrophic-minerotrophic gradient in Minnesota Wetlands , 2001 .

[4]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Impact: Toward a Framework for Understanding the Ecological Effects of Invaders , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[5]  B. Blossey.  Before, During and After: The Need for Long-term Monitoring in Invasive Plant Species Management , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[6]  Susan M. Galatowitsch,et al.  Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities , 2002 .

[7]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities , 1999, Nature.

[8]  C. Welling,et al.  ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF AN INCREASE IN WATER LEVEL ON WETLAND VEGETATION , 1994 .

[9]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  CANONICAL ANALYSIS OF PRINCIPAL COORDINATES: A USEFUL METHOD OF CONSTRAINED ORDINATION FOR ECOLOGY , 2003 .

[10]  M. Anderson.  Interactions betweenLythrum salicaria and native organisms: A critical review , 1995 .

[11]  D. Pearson,et al.  WEAK VS. STRONG INVADERS OF NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITIES: ASSESSING INVASIBILITY AND IMPACT , 2005 .

[12]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown? , 1999, Biological Invasions.

[13]  A. Bouchard,et al.  Plant Standing Crop and Productivity Relations in a Scirpus‐Equisetum Wetland , 1976 .

[14]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  Response of wetland plant species to hydrologic conditions , 2005, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[15]  J. Lovett-Doust,et al.  The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria , 1992 .

[16]  W. Daniels,et al.  Spatial variability in palustrine wetlands , 2001 .

[17]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to examine competitive response of 48 wetland plant species , 1998 .

[18]  D. Landis,et al.  Establishment and impact of Galerucella calmariensis L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Lythrum salicaria L. and associated plant communities in Michigan , 2003 .

[19]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Effect of Invasive Plant Species on Temperate Wetland Plant Diversity , 2004 .

[20]  S. Schooler.  Biological control of purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria by two chrysomelid beetles Galerucella pusilla and G. calmariensis , 1998 .

[21]  Barbara L. Bedford,et al.  PATTERNS IN NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY AND PLANT DIVERSITY OF TEMPERATE NORTH AMERICAN WETLANDS , 1999 .

[22]  R. H. Whittaker,et al.  Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities , 1965, Science.

[23]  D. Bazely,et al.  Ecology and Control of Introduced Plants , 2003 .

[24]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[25]  R. L. Stuckey,et al.  Spread, impact and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American wetlands. , 1987 .

[26]  H. Hager,et al.  Positive relationships between invasive purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and plant species diversity and abundance in Minnesota wetlands , 2004 .

[27]  D. Wilcove,et al.  QUANTIFYING THREATS TO IMPERILED SPECIES IN THE UNITED STATES , 1998 .

[28]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Realistic Species Losses Disproportionately Reduce Grassland Resistance to Biological Invaders , 2004, Science.

[29]  P. Grubb.  THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE , 1977 .

[30]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[31]  P. Vitousek,et al.  INTRODUCED SPECIES: A SIGNIFICANT COMPONENT OF HUMAN-CAUSED GLOBAL CHANGE , 1997 .

[32]  S. Galatowitsch,et al.  Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental US: twelve years post-reflooding , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[33]  M. Hill.  Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[34]  Peter B. McEvoy,et al.  Why Things Bite Back: Unintended Consequences of Biological Weed Control , 2000 .

[35]  Richard R. Horner,et al.  Wetlands and Urbanization: Implications for the Future , 2000 .

[36]  K. McCoy,et al.  The implications of accepting untestedhypotheses: a review of the effectsof purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria)in North America , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[37]  J. M. Sykes,et al.  USE OF VISUAL COVER ASSESSMENTS AS QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATORS OF SOME BRITISH WOODLAND TAXA , 1983 .

[38]  P. Keddy,et al.  Intensity and Asymmetry of Competition between Plant Pairs of Different Degrees of Similarity: An Experimental Study on Two Guilds of Wetland Plants , 1991 .

[39]  S. Cooke,et al.  Wetland Plant Communities in Relation to Watershed Development , 2000 .

[40]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Soil nutrient availability , 2000 .

[41]  M. F. Merigliano,et al.  The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland northwest, USA. , 1998 .

[42]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Multiple disturbances accelerate invasion of reed canary grass ( Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a mesocosm study , 2004, Oecologia.

[43]  R. Brooks,et al.  Impacts of sedimentation and nitrogen enrichment on wetland plant community development , 2005, Plant Ecology.

[44]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[45]  J. Molofsky,et al.  Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a Biological Model in the Study of Plant Invasions , 2004 .

[46]  J. Villaseñor,et al.  The rich generally get richer, but there are exceptions: Correlations between species richness of native plant species and alien weeds in Mexico , 2004 .

[47]  Robert K. Peet,et al.  The Measurement of Species Diversity , 1974 .

[48]  H. Mooney,et al.  Ecosystem Function of Biodiversity: A Summary , 1994 .