Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its three main metabolites; impact of CYP2D6, CYP2B6, and CYP3A4 genotype

Tramadol is a complex drug, being metabolized by polymorphic enzymes and administered as a racemate with the (+)‐ and (−)‐enantiomers of the parent compound and metabolites showing different pharmacological effects. The study aimed to simultaneously determine the enantiomer concentrations of tramadol, O‐desmethyltramadol, N‐desmethyltramadol, and N,O‐didesmethyltramadol following a single dose, and elucidate if enantioselective pharmacokinetics is associated with the time following drug intake and if interindividual differences may be genetically explained. Nineteen healthy volunteers were orally administered either 50 or 100 mg tramadol, whereupon blood samples were drawn at 17 occasions. Enantiomer concentrations in whole blood were measured by LC‐MS/MS and the CYP2D6, CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 genotype were determined, using the xTAG CYP2D6 Kit, pyrosequencing and real‐time PCR, respectively. A positive correlation between the (+)/(−)‐enantiomer ratio and time following drug administration was shown for all four enantiomer pairs. The largest increase in enantiomer ratio was observed for N‐desmethyltramadol in CYP2D6 extensive and intermediate metabolizers, rising from about two to almost seven during 24 hours following drug intake. CYP2D6 poor metabolizers showed metabolic profiles markedly different from the ones of intermediate and extensive metabolizers, with large area under the concentration curves (AUCs) of the N‐desmethyltramadol enantiomers and low corresponding values of the O‐desmethyltramadol and N,O‐didesmethyltramadol enantiomers, especially of the (+)‐enantiomers. Homozygosity of CYP2B6 *5 and *6 indicated a reduced enzyme function, although further studies are required to confirm it. In conclusion, the increase in enantiomer ratios over time might possibly be used to distinguish a recent tramadol intake from a past one. It also implies that, even though (+)‐O‐desmethyltramadol is regarded the enantiomer most potent in causing adverse effects, one should not investigate the (+)/(−)‐enantiomer ratio of O‐desmethyltramadol in relation to side effects without consideration for the time that has passed since drug intake.

[1]  M. Relling,et al.  Comparison of the Guidelines of the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  G. Lauretti,et al.  Impact of fraction unbound, CYP3A, and CYP2D6 in vivo activities, and other potential covariates to the clearance of tramadol enantiomers in patients with neuropathic pain , 2016, Fundamental & clinical pharmacology.

[3]  R. Kronstrand,et al.  Quantitation of the enantiomers of tramadol and its three main metabolites in human whole blood using LC-MS/MS. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  V. Haufroid,et al.  CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms and their relevance for poisoning due to amfetamines, opioid analgesics and antidepressants , 2015, Clinical toxicology.

[5]  K. Brøsen,et al.  The Pharmacogenetics of Tramadol , 2015, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[6]  L. Elens,et al.  The CYP3A4*22 C>T single nucleotide polymorphism is associated with reduced midazolam and tacrolimus clearance in stable renal allograft recipients , 2014, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[7]  G. Lauretti,et al.  Effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol enantiomers in patients with neuropathic pain phenotyped as cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive metabolizers , 2014, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[8]  R. Altman,et al.  PharmGKB summary: tramadol pathway. , 2014, Pharmacogenetics and genomics.

[9]  R. Kronstrand,et al.  Pharmacogenetic aspects of tramadol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after a single oral dose. , 2014, Forensic science international.

[10]  J. Swen,et al.  Challenges in CYP2D6 phenotype assignment from genotype data: a critical assessment and call for standardization. , 2014, Current drug metabolism.

[11]  Z. Zahari,et al.  Influence of Cytochrome P450, Family 2, Subfamily D, Polypeptide 6 (CYP2D6) polymorphisms on pain sensitivity and clinical response to weak opioid analgesics. , 2014, Drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

[12]  E. Wiemer,et al.  CYP3A4*22 Genotype and Systemic Exposure Affect Paclitaxel-Induced Neurotoxicity , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  Ulrich M. Zanger,et al.  Pharmacogenetics of cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6): advances on polymorphisms, mechanisms, and clinical relevance , 2013, Front. Genet..

[14]  U. Zanger,et al.  Pharmacogenomics of Cytochrome P450 3A4: Recent Progress Toward the “Missing Heritability” Problem , 2013, Front. Genet..

[15]  V. Haufroid,et al.  CYP3A4 intron 6 C>T SNP (CYP3A4*22) encodes lower CYP3A4 activity in cancer patients, as measured with probes midazolam and erythromycin. , 2013, Pharmacogenomics.

[16]  V. Haufroid,et al.  CYP3A4*22: promising newly identified CYP3A4 variant allele for personalizing pharmacotherapy. , 2013, Pharmacogenomics.

[17]  H. Nahi,et al.  Association of CYP2B6 Genotype with Survival and Progression Free Survival in Cyclophosphamide Treated Multiple Myeloma , 2012 .

[18]  V. Haufroid,et al.  A new functional CYP3A4 intron 6 polymorphism significantly affects tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in kidney transplant recipients. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  J. Lötsch,et al.  Genetically Polymorphic OCT1: Another Piece in the Puzzle of the Variable Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Opioidergic Drug Tramadol , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  H. Guchelaar,et al.  Pharmacogenetics: From Bench to Byte— An Update of Guidelines , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  R. Sansone,et al.  Tramadol: seizures, serotonin syndrome, and coadministered antidepressants. , 2009, Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)).

[22]  A. Foroumadi,et al.  Enantioselective determination of tramadol and its main phase I metabolites in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[23]  P. Silverstone,et al.  Single- and multiple-dose bioequivalence of two once-daily tramadol formulations using stereospecific analysis of tramadol and its demethylated (M1 and M5) metabolites , 2007, Current medical research and opinion.

[24]  M. A. Campanero,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of tramadol enantiomers and their respective phase I metabolites in relation to CYP2D6 phenotype. , 2007, Pharmacological research.

[25]  K. Brøsen,et al.  Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers , 2006, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[26]  F. Fliegert,et al.  The effects of tramadol on static and dynamic pupillometry in healthy subjects—the relationship between pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 metaboliser status , 2005, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[27]  Yu Yang,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of trans-tramadol and its active metabolite, trans-O-demethyltramadol, in healthy male and female chinese volunteers. , 2004, Chirality.

[28]  S. Grond,et al.  Clinical Pharmacology of Tramadol , 2004, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[29]  C. Gillen,et al.  Affinity, potency and efficacy of tramadol and its metabolites at the cloned human µ-opioid receptor , 2000, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology.

[30]  S. Fanali,et al.  Simultaneous stereoselective analysis by capillary electrophoresis of tramadol enantiomers and their main phase I metabolites in urine. , 1999, Journal of chromatography. A.

[31]  R. Shank,et al.  Complementary and synergistic antinociceptive interaction between the enantiomers of tramadol. , 1993, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.