Timer versus moisture sensor-based irrigation control of soilless lettuce: effects on yield, quality and water use efficiency.

Montesano F.F., van Iersel M.W., Parente A. (2016): Timer versus moisture sensor-based irrigation control of soilless lettuce: Effects on yield, quality and water use efficiency. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 43: 67–75. The study compares the effects of: timer (‘Timer’) and soil moisture sensor-controlled irrigation on soilless lettuce; two volumetric water content (Θ) thresholds for irrigation (0.30 (‘Θ = 0.3’) and 0.40 m3/m3 (‘Θ = 0.4’)). The most nutrient solution (NS) was applied in ‘Timer’ where the lowest water use efficiency was observed, with 17 and 42% less NS used in ‘Θ = 0.4’ and ‘Θ = 0.3’, respectively. Irrigation volumes followed the plant water needs in the sensor-controlled treatments, with little or no leaching, while 18% of leaching was recorded in ‘Timer’. Plants in ‘Timer’ and ‘Θ = 0.4’ had higher fresh weights (24%) and leaf area (13%) than plants in ‘Θ = 0.3’. Similar dry weight was observed among treatments but percentage of dry matter was 20% higher in ‘Θ = 0.3’. Gas exchanges and leaf tissues chemical composition were similar in all treatments, but nitrate concentration was lower in the ‘Θ = 0.3’ plants. Precision sensor-controlled irrigation based on Θ measurements is an effective tool to increase the overall water use efficiency and to improve the quality of soilless-grown lettuce by acting on the substrate moisture level.

[1]  L. Ledda,et al.  Leaf and Plant Water Use Efficiency in Cocksfoot and Tall Fescue Accessions under Differing Soil Water Availability , 2012 .

[2]  Fengxin Wang,et al.  Soil Water Tension, a Powerful Measurement for Productivity and Stewardship , 2011 .

[3]  R. Wallach.  PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILLESS MEDIA , 2008 .

[4]  W. C. Fonteno,et al.  Developing Moisture Characteristic Curves and Their Descriptive Functions at Low Tensions for Soilless Substrates , 2010 .

[5]  Erik Lichtenberg,et al.  Grower demand for sensor‐controlled irrigation , 2015 .

[6]  O. Verdonck,et al.  THE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SUBSTRATES IN HORTICULTURE , 1972 .

[7]  P. Santamaria,et al.  Effect of growing system and cultivar on yield and water-use efficiency of greenhouse-grown tomato , 2008 .

[8]  K. Reinink.  Relationship between effects of seasonal change on nitrate and dry matter content in lettuce , 1993 .

[9]  T. Broyer,et al.  Comparative chlorine requirements of different plant species , 1957, Plant and Soil.

[10]  Y. Rouphael,et al.  Nutrient solution concentration and growing season affect yield and quality of Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala in floating raft culture. , 2009 .

[11]  Francesco Montesano,et al.  Calibration and performance of moisture sensors in soilless substrates: ECH2O and Theta probes , 2007 .

[12]  M. Gil,et al.  Sensory quality, bioactive constituents and microbiological quality of green and red fresh-cut lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.) are influenced by soil and soilless agricultural production systems , 2012 .

[13]  Hans-Peter Kläring,et al.  Strategies to control water and nutrient supplies to greenhouse crops. A review , 2001 .

[14]  M. V. Iersel,et al.  Morphology and Irrigation Efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri Grown with Capacitance Sensor-controlled Irrigation , 2008 .

[15]  H. Jones.  Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  J. Boyer,et al.  Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn, soybean, and sunflower at various leaf water potentials. , 1970, Plant physiology.

[17]  Marc W. van Iersel,et al.  An automated system for controlling drought stress and irrigation in potted plants , 2006 .

[18]  Liwei Shao,et al.  The effects of nitrogen supply and water regime on instantaneous WUE, time-integrated WUE and carbon isotope discrimination in winter wheat , 2013 .

[19]  William R. Argo.  Root Medium Physical Properties , 2002 .

[20]  J. Ingram,et al.  Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  M. V. Iersel,et al.  Physiological Responses to Different Substrate Water Contents: Screening for High Water-use Efficiency in Bedding Plants , 2008 .

[22]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Use of Irrigation Technologies for Vegetable Crops in Florida , 2010 .

[23]  J. Flexas,et al.  Water‐use efficiency in grapevine cultivars grown under controlled conditions: effects of water stress at the leaf and whole‐plant level , 2012 .

[24]  W. Jury,et al.  The role of science in solving the world's emerging water problems. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  S. Charpentier,et al.  Measuring Hysteretic Hydraulic Properties of Peat and Pine Bark using a Transient Method , 2005 .

[26]  Marc W. van Iersel,et al.  Growth and Water Use of Petunia as Affected by Substrate Water Content and Daily Light Integral , 2010 .

[27]  C. Restuccia,et al.  Salinity of nutrient solution influences the shelf-life of fresh-cut lettuce grown in floating system , 2011 .

[28]  Erik Lichtenberg,et al.  Profitability of Sensor-based Irrigation in Greenhouse and Nursery Crops , 2013 .

[29]  G. Cortella,et al.  Influence of hydroponic and soil cultivation on quality and shelf life of ready-to-eat lamb's lettuce (Valerianella locusta L. Laterr). , 2011, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[30]  A. Bootsma,et al.  Genotypical differences in nitrate content inLactuca sativa L. and related species and correlation with dry matter content , 2004, Euphytica.

[31]  P. Santamaria,et al.  Ammonium and nitrate influence on artichoke growth rate and uptake of inorganic ions , 1996 .