A theoretical and practical framework based on plasticity theory for the drained behavior of single and multiple shallow footings

With the shift of the offshore wind energy sector to deeper waters, demand for the development of more complex foundation solutions, particularly suction bucket – supported tripod/tetrapod and jacket foundations, has increased. This paper is divided into two main sections. The first part comprises a comprehensive review of the performance of circular surface and shallow foundations under combined loading (VHM), and how it can principally be understood in a theoretical framework of plasticity theory. Examination of the considered data suggested that the general assumption of over‐estimated non‐association degree with constant failure surface parameters and increasing vertical load may require further investigation. This may be attributed to the complex interplay of multiple properties such as stress level, soil strength profile and foundation geometry. The existing data in the literature were also used to provide practical guidance for a successful implementation of the elasto‐plastic constitutive relationships in offshore foundation design. In second part of the paper, the suitability of the non‐associated plasticity formulation for a baseline multi‐pod system in H‐M load space was investigated using three‐dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analyses and not verified. Furthermore, the failure envelopes and hardening law for caissons with different embedment ratios differed from those recommended in the literature were established. Parametric studies of multi‐caisson foundations revealed that the failure mechanism of multi‐bucket foundations under horizontal loading depended greatly on the bucket spacing. The horizontal bearing capacities increased with the bucket spacing until they reached a threshold. Meanwhile, analyses of the multi‐bucket foundation under moment loading confirmed the occurrence of a push‐pull failure mechanism.

[1]  L. B. Ibsen,et al.  Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests , 2021 .

[2]  A. Barari,et al.  Failure Envelopes for Combined Loading of Skirted Foundations in Layered Deposits , 2021, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering.

[3]  Jae‐Hyun Kim,et al.  Behavior of a Monopod Bucket Foundation Subjected to Combined Moment and Horizontal Loads in Silty Sand , 2021 .

[4]  Nicholas A Alexander,et al.  Dynamic design considerations for offshore wind turbine jackets supported on multiple foundations , 2019, Marine Structures.

[5]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Minimum foundation size and spacing for jacket supported offshore wind turbines considering dynamic design criteria , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[6]  L. A. Padrón,et al.  Closed-form stiffnesses of multi-bucket foundations for OWT including group effect correction factors , 2019, Marine Structures.

[7]  Subhamoy Bhattacharya,et al.  Closed form solution for the first natural frequency of offshore wind turbine jackets supported on multiple foundations incorporating soil-structure interaction , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  A. Barari,et al.  Numerical studies on soil-skirt roughness and sand plug impact in bearing capacity prediction of caisson foundations subjected to the uniaxial loads , 2018, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy.

[9]  Hans Petter Jostad,et al.  A macro-element for integrated time domain analyses representing bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines , 2018 .

[10]  Le Chi Hung,et al.  Evaluation of horizontal and moment bearing capacities of tripod bucket foundations in sand , 2017 .

[11]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Embedment Effects on Vertical Bearing Capacity of Offshore Bucket Foundations on Cohesionless Soil , 2017 .

[12]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  Bearing strength surface for bridge caisson foundations in frictional soil under combined loading , 2016 .

[13]  Ren-peng Chen,et al.  Lateral cyclic pile–soil interaction studies on a rigid model monopile , 2015 .

[14]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Effect of Embedment on the Plastic Behavior of Bucket Foundations , 2015 .

[15]  T. Tjelta.  The suction foundation technology , 2015 .

[16]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  A generalised failure envelope for undrained capacity of circular shallow foundations under general loading , 2014 .

[17]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Calibration of Failure Criteria for Bucket Foundations on Drained Sand under General Loading , 2014 .

[18]  Lars Bo Ibsen,et al.  Adaptive plasticity model for bucket foundations , 2014 .

[19]  Dong-Soo Kim,et al.  Investigation of Monotonic and Cyclic Behavior of Tripod Suction Bucket Foundations for Offshore Wind Towers Using Centrifuge Modeling , 2014 .

[20]  Le Chi Hung,et al.  Evaluation of Undrained Bearing Capacities of Bucket Foundations Under Combined Loads , 2014 .

[21]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Modified Expression for the Failure Criterion of Bucket Foundations Subjected to Combined Loading , 2013 .

[22]  Martin Achmus,et al.  Load-bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations in sand , 2013 .

[23]  Kim André Larsen,et al.  Modified vertical bearing capacity for circular foundations in sand using reduced friction angle , 2012 .

[24]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Undrained Bearing Capacity of Deeply Buried Flat Circular Footings under General Loading , 2012 .

[25]  Mark Fraser Bransby,et al.  The undrained capacity of skirted strip foundations under combined loading , 2009 .

[26]  S. Gourvenec.  Effect of embedment on the undrained capacity of shallow foundations under general loading , 2008 .

[27]  Gijae Yun,et al.  The horizontal-moment capacity of embedded foundations in undrained soil , 2007 .

[28]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay , 2003 .

[29]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading , 2002 .

[30]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Observations of footing behaviour on loose carbonate sands , 2001 .

[31]  John P. Carter,et al.  Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading , 2000 .

[32]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  Plastic response of circular footings on sand under general planar loading , 1999 .

[33]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Combined loading of skirted foundations , 1998 .

[34]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations , 1997 .

[35]  Y. P. Vaid,et al.  The strength and dilatancy of sand , 1992 .

[36]  Finian Seng Chin Tan.  Centrifuge and theoretical modelling of conical footings on sand , 1990 .

[37]  M. Bolton.  THE STRENGTH AND DILATANCY OF SANDS , 1986 .

[38]  M. Randolph,et al.  The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil , 1984 .

[39]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Discussion on the use of physical models in design , 1979 .

[40]  T. W. Lambe,et al.  Predictions in soil engineering , 1973 .

[41]  A. Barari,et al.  Insight into the post-liquefaction behaviour of skirted foundations , 2019 .

[42]  Carlo G. Lai,et al.  Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions , 2019 .

[43]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Long-Term Lateral Cyclic Response of Suction Caisson Foundations in Sand , 2013 .

[44]  J. Maranha,et al.  The experimental determination of the angle of dilatancy in soils. , 2009 .

[45]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Moment loading of caissons installed in saturated sand , 2005 .

[46]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay , 2004 .

[47]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Modelling of shallow foundations for offshore structures , 2003 .

[48]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Determining Appropriate Stiffness Levels for Spudcan Foundations Using Jack-Up Case Records , 2002 .

[49]  Byron W. Byrne,et al.  Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand , 2000 .

[50]  A. Rt.  Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading , 2000 .

[51]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Drained Behaviour of Suction Caisson Foundations on Very Dense Sand , 1999 .

[52]  R. Eatock Taylor,et al.  Non-linear analysis of jack-up structures subjected to random waves , 1999 .

[53]  J. D. Murff,et al.  Limit analysis of multi-footings foundation systems , 1994 .