Information theoretical quantification of cooperativity in signalling complexes

BackgroundIntra-cellular information exchange, propelled by cascades of interacting signalling proteins, is essential for the proper functioning and survival of cells. Now that the interactome of several organisms is being mapped and several structural mechanisms of cooperativity at the molecular level in proteins have been elucidated, the formalization of this fundamental quantity, i.e. information, in these very diverse biological contexts becomes feasible.ResultsWe show here that Shannon's mutual information quantifies information in biological system and more specifically the cooperativity inherent to the assembly of macromolecular complexes. We show how protein complexes can be considered as particular instances of noisy communication channels. Further we show, using a portion of the p27 regulatory pathway, how classical equilibrium thermodynamic quantities such as binding affinities and chemical potentials can be used to quantify information exchange but also to determine engineering properties such as channel noise and channel capacity. As such, this information measure identifies and quantifies those protein concentrations that render the biochemical system most effective in switching between the active and inactive state of the intracellular process.ConclusionThe proposed framework provides a new and original approach to analyse the effects of cooperativity in the assembly of macromolecular complexes. It shows the conditions, provided by the protein concentrations, for which a particular system acts most effectively, i.e. exchanges the most information. As such this framework opens the possibility of grasping biological qualities such as system sensitivity, robustness or plasticity directly in terms of their effect on information exchange. Although these parameters might also be derived using classical thermodynamic parameters, a recasting of biological signalling in terms of information exchange offers an alternative framework for visualising network cooperativity that might in some cases be more intuitive.

[1]  F. Dahlquist [13] The meaning of scatchard and hill plots , 1978 .

[2]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  W. J. McGill Multivariate information transmission , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[4]  Shai Linn,et al.  The expression of the ubiquitin ligase subunit Cks1 in human breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[5]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  p27 destruction: Cks1 pulls the trigger , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[6]  J. Williamson,et al.  Cooperativity in macromolecular assembly. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[7]  Michele Pagano,et al.  When protein destruction runs amok, malignancy is on the loose. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[8]  Michele Pagano,et al.  Three Different Binding Sites of Cks1 Are Required for p27-Ubiquitin Ligation* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  H Strohmaier,et al.  A CDK-independent function of mammalian Cks1: targeting of SCF(Skp2) to the CDK inhibitor p27Kip1. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[10]  Hsuan-Ying Huang,et al.  Skp2 Overexpression Is Highly Representative of Intrinsic Biological Aggressiveness and Independently Associated with Poor Prognosis in Primary Localized Myxofibrosarcomas , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  Brett Larsen,et al.  The cell-cycle regulatory protein Cks1 is required for SCFSkp2-mediated ubiquitinylation of p27 , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  Takashi Takata,et al.  Role of Cks1 overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinomas: cooperation with Skp2 in promoting p27 degradation. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[13]  Irene Luque,et al.  The linkage between protein folding and functional cooperativity: two sides of the same coin? , 2002, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[14]  J. Harper Protein destruction: Adapting roles for Cks proteins , 2001, Current Biology.

[15]  M. Pagano,et al.  Regulation of the Cdk inhibitor p27 and its deregulation in cancer , 2000, Journal of cellular physiology.

[16]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Conformational changes associated with protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[17]  J. Mestan,et al.  Skp2 is oncogenic and overexpressed in human cancers , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Jose Luis Beltran Guerrero,et al.  Multivariate mutual information , 1994 .

[19]  A. Fersht,et al.  Strategy for analysing the co-operativity of intramolecular interactions in peptides and proteins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  G. A. Barnard,et al.  Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. , 1961 .

[21]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[22]  T M Laue,et al.  Analysis of protein and DNA-mediated contributions to cooperative assembly of protein-DNA complexes. , 1998, Methods.

[23]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  The meaning of Scatchard and Hill plots. , 1978, Methods in enzymology.

[24]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  A systems biology perspective on protein structural dynamics and signal transduction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[25]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Laura S Itzhaki,et al.  Cooperative organization in a macromolecular complex , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  L. Serrano,et al.  Quantifying information transfer by protein domains: Analysis of the Fyn SH2 domain structure , 2008, BMC Structural Biology.

[28]  K. Imai,et al.  Hemoglobin Chesapeake (92 alpha, arginine--leucine). Precise measurements and analyses of oxygen equilibrium. , 1974, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communications , 1948 .