A Computational Model for Determining Levels of Factors in Inventory Management Using Response Surface Methodology

Inventory management plays a critical role in balancing supply availability with customer requirements and significantly contributes to the performance of the whole supply chain. It involves many different features, such as controlling and managing purchases from suppliers to consumers, keeping safety stock, examining the amount of product for sale, and order fulfillment. This paper involves the development of computational modeling for the inventory control problem in Thailand. The problem focuses on determining levels of factors, which are order quantity, reorder point, target stock, and inventory review policy, using a heuristic approach. The objective is to determine the best levels of factors that are significantly affected by their responses to optimize them using the response surface methodology. Values of the quantity of backlog and the average inventory amount, as well as their corresponding total costs, are simulated using the Arena software to gain statistical power. Then, the Minitab-response surface methodology is used to find the feasible solutions of the responses, which consist of test power and sample size, full factorial design, and Box–Behnken design. For a numerical example, the computational model is tested with real data to show the efficacy of the model. The result suggests that the effects from the reorder point, target stock, and inventory review policy are significant to the minimum total cost if their levels are set appropriately. The managerial implications of this model’s results not only suggest the best levels of factors for a case study of the leading air compressor manufacturers in Thailand, but also provide a guideline for decision-makers to satisfy customer demand at the minimum possible total inventory cost. Therefore, this paper can be a useful reference for warehouse supervisors, managers, and policymakers to determine the best levels of factors to improve warehouse performance.

[1]  Jirachai Buddhakulsomsiri,et al.  Mathematical Model of Inventory Policy under Limited Storage Space for Continuous and Periodic Review Policies with Backlog and Lost Sales , 2017 .

[2]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  Differentiated preemptive dispatching for automatic materials handling services in 300 mm semiconductor foundry , 2006 .

[3]  Shib Sankar Sana.  An EOQ model for stochastic demand for limited capacity of own warehouse , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[4]  Dong Myung Lee,et al.  Quantifying the impact of a supply chain's design parameters on the bullwhip effect using simulation and Taguchi design of experiments , 2012 .

[5]  Georghios P. Sphicas,et al.  EOQ and EPQ with linear and fixed backorder costs: Two cases identified and models analyzed without calculus , 2006 .

[6]  Sarada Prasad Sarmah,et al.  Determination of optimal order-up to level quantities for dependent spare parts using data mining , 2016, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[7]  Thong Ngee Goh,et al.  The Role of Statistical Design of Experiments in Six Sigma: Perspectives of a Practitioner , 2002 .

[8]  Hsien-Pin Hsu,et al.  An Improved Dispatching Method (a-HPDB) for Automated Material Handling System with Active Rolling Belt for 450 mm Wafer Fabrication , 2017 .

[9]  Minghe Sun,et al.  Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Determining order-up-to levels under periodic review for compound binomial (intermittent) demand , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Deniz Baş,et al.  Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology , 2007 .

[12]  Moncer Hariga,et al.  A single-item continuous review inventory problem with space restriction , 2010 .

[13]  Young-Long Chen,et al.  DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS ON NEURAL NETWORK'S PARAMETERS OPTIMIZATION FOR TIME SERIES FORECASTING IN STOCK MARKETS , 2013 .

[14]  Yves Dallery,et al.  Periodic control of intermittent demand items: theory and empirical analysis , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Roberto Rossi,et al.  Computing the non-stationary replenishment cycle inventory policy under stochastic supplier lead-times , 2010 .

[16]  Zhang Wu,et al.  An integrated framework of statistical process control and design of experiments for optimizing wire electrochemical turning process , 2011 .

[17]  Y. Wen,et al.  What Inventories Tell Us about Aggregate Fluctuations - A Tractable Approach to (S,s) Policies , 2014 .

[18]  Mohsen A. Hassan,et al.  A surface response optimization model for EPQ system with imperfect production process under rework and shortage , 2017 .

[19]  Ruud H. Teunter,et al.  Calculating order-up-to levels for products with intermittent demand , 2009 .

[20]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  A simulated model for cycle time reduction by acquiring optimal lot size in semiconductor manufacturing , 2007 .

[21]  F. Masmoudi,et al.  A multi-product lot size in make-to-order supply chain using discrete event simulation and response surface methodology , 2010 .

[22]  Georghios P. Sphicas.  Generalized EOQ formula using a new parameter: Coefficient of backorder attractiveness , 2014 .

[23]  Mario Versaci.  Fuzzy approach and Eddy currents NDT/NDE devices in industrial applications , 2016 .

[24]  Hsien-Pin Hsu,et al.  The remaining time concept for dispatching on roller belt conveyor in 450-mm wafer fabrications , 2019 .

[25]  Xu-Ren Luo.  A Detailed Examination of Sphicas (2014), Generalized EOQ Formula Using a New Parameter: Coefficient of Backorder Attractiveness , 2019, Symmetry.

[26]  Eugenia Babiloni,et al.  On the exact calculation of the fill rate in a periodic review inventory policy under discrete demand patterns , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  Recoverable robustness in weekly berth and quay crane planning , 2019, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[28]  Chia Nan Wang,et al.  Optimization on effects of design parameter on displacement amplification ratio of 2 DOF working platform employing Bridge-type compliant mechanism flexure hinge using Taguchi method , 2019, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[29]  M. Bezerra,et al.  Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. , 2008, Talanta.

[30]  M. Cardós,et al.  Exact and approximate calculation of the cycle service level in periodic review inventory policies , 2011 .

[31]  Mehmet Mutlu Yenisey,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF LOT SIZING STRATEGY VIA DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION , 2012 .

[32]  S. Minner.  A comparison of simple heuristics for multi-product dynamic demand lot-sizing with limited warehouse capacity , 2009 .

[33]  E. Silver,et al.  The exact fill rate in a periodic review base stock system under normally distributed demand , 2011 .