Sequential Programming Instruction and Gender Differences

Serious concern about the differences that exist between the performance of female and male students in mathematics, science, and by extension, information technology (IT), has led researchers to attempt to identify why female students have inferior performance. This paper first reviews the relevant literature in order to isolate the age group in which the difference is most prevalent, and then identifies the learning strategies that seem to cause the largest difference. The results of students taking a second-year college theoretical mathematical course are then compared to those of students in a third-year college IT course, so as to explain why female students performed better in the mathematical course than in the IT course. Possible causes for the differences are isolated to inform the learning strategy that has subsequently been adopted for the IT course. The main difference between the courses was predicted to be that students may have not been aware of all that was expected of them or that they needed guidance to overcome initial obstacles faced in learning programming. Statistical analysis of the results reveals that female student distributions among the different grade sectors are positively affected by the new approach. Results are applicable to theories of pedagogy of teaching information technology courses.

[1]  Sandra Katz,et al.  Gender and race in predicting achievement in computer science , 2003, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[2]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College Women and Men. , 1981 .

[3]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[4]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[5]  Eshaa M. Alkhalifa Effects of the Cognitive Level of Thought on Learning Complex Material , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Thelma Estrin Women's Studies and Computer Science: Their Intersection , 1996, IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput..

[7]  Nancy E. Betz,et al.  The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors , 1983 .

[8]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Caring about connections: gender and computing , 1999, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[9]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[10]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Sex differences in career self-efficacy, consideration, and interests of eighth and ninth graders. , 1985 .

[11]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[12]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics: Results from National Assessment. , 1981 .

[13]  Sue A. Stickel,et al.  Sex Differences in Career Self-Efficacy. , 1989 .

[14]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. , 1986 .

[15]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency , 2024, Psihologìâ ì suspìlʹstvo.

[16]  Allan Fisher,et al.  Unlocking the Clubhouse : Women in Computing by Allan Fisher , 2015 .

[17]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.