A central role for Transport Modelling is to allow alternative strategies to be assessed. Most people involved in modelling are aware of the general principles of economic evaluation, but it remains a specialised topic, and tends to take second place in the literature to the more glamorous discussion of models. However, if the assessment tools are not integrated with the models themselves, much of the model sophistication may be wasted. It was therefore considered appropriate to commission a resource paper for the 10 IATBR Conference. The paper has a number of aims. It begins by discussing the theoretical foundations of evaluation in economics, and, without being excessively academic, attempts to give an understanding of how the theory has developed. It then contrasts this with current practice, examining the validity of the simplifications which are typically made, as well as the developments in this area. Continuing progress in the theory of discrete choice models, as well as the development of their use in transport modelling, has led to some key theoretical conclusions, which serve usefully to integrate modelling and evaluation. However, there are still some conflicts between the ideal theoretical requirements and what is considered practical. The paper is primarily aimed at mathematical modellers rather than at economists, most of whom will be familiar with much of the material. It includes the essential theory of the consumer that is available in economic textbooks, but without requiring the reader to become too involved in general questions of economic theory. Particular emphasis is placed on practical issues. Finally, the paper draws attention to a number of controversial areas, where further work is required, both theoretical and practical. An admission is due at the outset. Part of my intention for the paper was to effect a synthesis of the theory of modelling and evaluation in a way which I did not believe was available in an accessible form. I had not seen the excellent paper by Jara-Diaz & Farah (1988) which does indeed achieve such a synthesis, although I was aware of other work by Jara-Diaz et al. I believe that we are in substantial agreement, though there are some nuances of presentational difference. There remain some unresolved issues. It is hoped that, both at the conference itself and thereafter, this paper may assist in stimulating their resolution. It is also my intention that the final version of the paper should benefit substantially from advice and criticism received. In particular, appropriate contributions from others involved in this area will be gratefully received, incorporated, and acknowledged! Since the practical issues discussed in Section 3 are rather heavily based on the experience in the UK, examples demonstrating different approaches from other countries would also be most welcome.
[1]
W. M. Gorman.
Community Preference Fields
,
1953
.
[2]
P T Mcintosh,et al.
GENERALISED COSTS, AND THE ESTIMATION OF MOVEMENT COSTS AND BENEFITS IN TRANSPORT PLANNING
,
1970
.
[3]
John Hicks,et al.
A Revision of Demand Theory
,
1957
.
[4]
A. Marshall,et al.
Principles of Economics
,
1891
.
[5]
Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.
Book Review: Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications
,
1982
.
[6]
Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.
ON THE SOCIAL VALUATION OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS.
,
1998
.
[7]
K. Small,et al.
Applied Welfare Economics with Discrete Choice Models
,
1979
.
[8]
P. Mackie,et al.
THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS IN EVALUATION
,
2001
.
[9]
Y Iida,et al.
Transportation Network Analysis
,
1997
.
[10]
David A. Hensher,et al.
Value of business travel time
,
1977
.
[11]
Harold Hotelling,et al.
Demand Functions with Limited Budgets
,
1935
.
[12]
H. Hotelling.
THE GENERAL WELFARE IN RELATION TO PROBLEMS OF TAXATION AND OF RAILWAY AND UTILITY RATES. IN: RAILWAYS
,
1938
.
[13]
D. McFadden,et al.
URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS
,
1977
.
[14]
J. Muellbauer,et al.
Economics and consumer behavior
,
1980
.
[15]
Daniel McFadden,et al.
Computing Willingness-to-Pay in Random Utility Models
,
1996
.
[16]
L. A. Goodman,et al.
Social Choice and Individual Values
,
1951
.
[17]
Stephen Glaister,et al.
Fundamentals of transport economics
,
1981
.
[18]
J. Dupuit.
De la mesure de l'utilité des travaux publics
,
1850
.
[19]
L. R. Kadiyali,et al.
Value of travel time savings
,
1983
.
[20]
W. M. Gorman.
SEPARABLE UTILITY AND AGGREGATION
,
1959
.
[21]
Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.
VALUATION OF USERS' BENEFITS IN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS
,
1988
.
[22]
Nils Bruzelius,et al.
The Value of Travel Time.
,
1980
.
[23]
H. Williams.
On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit
,
1977
.
[24]
A. Karlqvist,et al.
Spatial interaction theory and planning models
,
1978
.
[25]
R. Stone.
Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis : an application to the pattern of British demand
,
1954
.
[26]
H Newberger,et al.
THE ECONOMIC APPRAISAL OF LAND-USE PLANS
,
1976
.
[27]
Robert D. Willig,et al.
Consumer's Surplus Without Apology
,
1976
.
[28]
J. Kadane.
Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications
,
1984
.
[29]
D. McFadden.
Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice
,
1981
.
[30]
H Neuburger,et al.
USER BENEFIT IN THE EVALUATION OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE PLANS
,
1971
.