Simulation studies of a new 'OpenPET' geometry based on a quad unit of detector rings.

We have proposed an 'OpenPET' geometry which consists of two detector rings of axial length W each axially separated by a gap G. In order to obtain an axially continuous field-of-view (FOV) of 2W+G, the maximum limit for G must be W. However, two valleys of sensitivity appear, one on each side of the gap. In practice, the gap should be G<W in order to compensate for the sensitivity valleys. In this paper, we proposed an alternative method to improve uniformity of the sensitivity while maintaining the gap. The proposed geometry consisted of four units of detector rings obtained by dividing each right and left unit of detector rings into two units. The inner two units formed the main gap, and the outer two units were appropriately placed to improve the uniformity of sensitivity. The geometry was optimized to minimize the standard deviation of the sensitivity distribution. Numerical simulation results supported the effectiveness of the proposed method. The outer units compensated for the sensitivity valleys on both sides of the main gap. A more appropriate geometry should be designed for the desired application, such as a long axial FOV PET and in-beam PET.

[1]  Hongdi Li,et al.  The initial design and feasibility study of an affordable high-resolution 100-cm long PET , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[2]  Nuno Ferreira,et al.  Sensitivity assessment of wide Axial Field of View PET systems via Monte Carlo simulations of NEMA-like measurements , 2007 .

[3]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  Eiji Yoshida,et al.  A proposal of an open PET geometry , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Keiichi Nakagawa,et al.  Experimental verification of proton beam monitoring in a human body by use of activity image of positron-emitting nuclei generated by nuclear fragmentation reaction , 2008, Radiological physics and technology.

[6]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Charged hadron tumour therapy monitoring by means of PET , 2004 .

[7]  T. Tomitani,et al.  Monitoring the irradiation field of 12C and 16O SOBP beams using positron emitters produced through projectile fragmentation reactions , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  H. Murayama,et al.  First Human Brain Imaging by the jPET-D4 Prototype With a Pre-Computed System Matrix , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  T. Tomitani,et al.  Experimental determination of particle range and dose distribution in thick targets through fragmentation reactions of stable heavy ions , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  On the detector arrangement for in-beam PET for hadron therapy monitoring , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Hiroshi Uchida,et al.  Dose-volume delivery guided proton therapy using beam on-line PET system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  H. Murayama,et al.  8-layer DOI encoding of 3-dimensional crystal array , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[13]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Implementation of true continuous bed motion in 2-D and 3-D whole-body PET scanning , 2001 .

[14]  Hideyuki Mizuno,et al.  Positron camera for range verification of heavy-ion radiotherapy , 2003 .

[15]  K. Parodi,et al.  Suppression of random coincidences during in-beam PET measurements at ion beam radiotherapy facilities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.