Trust in B2C E-Commerce Interface

Electronic commerce (e-commerce) is changing the way people make business transactions, especially in the business-to-consumer (B2C) area, and it is becoming a significant global economic force. Since Internet technologies and infrastructures to support e-commerce are now in place, attention is turning to psychological factors that affect e-commerce acceptance by online users and their perceptions of online transactions. One such factor is trust, seen to be key to the proliferation of e-commerce. Trust has existed as long as the history of humans and human social interactions, and it has been studied long before the emergence of the Internet or e-commerce. With respect to consumer behavior, studies have mainly focused on trust and trust relationships in the off-line world and have emerged from numerous disciplinary fields since the 1950s (Corritore, Kracher, & Wiedenbeck, 2001). These disciplines, including philosophy, sociology, psychology, management, marketing, ergonomics, human-computer interaction (HCI), and industrial psychology (Corritore, Kracher, & Wiedenbeck, 2003), have together contributed an extensive body of literature on trust in general, and therefore, they are important grounding points for the examination of trust in the online world. However, “trust is an extraordinarily rich concept, covering a variety of relationships, conjoining a variety of objects,” as Nissenbaum (2001, p. 104) has pointed out. Due to the complex and abstract nature of trust, each discipline has its own understanding of the concept and different ways to conceptualize it according to the features of a particular context. Even with the diverse trust research, researchers from every discipline do acknowledge the value of trust and generally observe and accept four characteristics of trust. First, there must exist two specific parties in any trusting relationship: a trusting party (trustor) and a party to be trusted (trustee). The two parties, comprised of persons, organizations, and/or products, constantly evaluate each other’s behaviors. Second, trust involves vulnerability. Trust is only needed, and actually flourishes, in an environment that is uncertain and risky. Third, trust decreases complexity in a complex world and leads people to take actions, mostly risk-taking behaviors. “Without trust people would be confronted with the incomprehensible complexity of considering every possible eventuality before deciding what to do” (Grabner-Krauter & Kaluscha, 2003, p. 787). And fourth, trust is a subjective matter. It is directly related to and affected by individual differences and situational factors. The previously mentioned characteristics of trust make it especially needed in e-commerce because people perceive economic transactions in a virtual environment as posing a higher degree of uncertainty than in traditional settings. Most e-commerce transactions are not only separated in time and space, but are also conducted via limited communication channels and impersonal interfaces, making trust a crucial facilitator for people to overcome fear, risks, and complexity. Therefore, online consumers need trust as a mental shortcut to reduce the complexity of conducting business transactions with online vendors (Luhmann, 1989). Such trust occurring in cyberspace is commonly termed “online trust,” and we limit the scope to the online trust that is pertinent to B2C e-commerce, namely, the trust that occurs for an individual Internet user toward a specific e-commerce Web site or the online vendor that the Web site represents. Derived from the general definition for trust (Rousseau, Sitkin, Burt, & Camerer, 1998), online trust can be defined as follows: an Internet user’s psychological state of risk acceptance based upon the positive expectations of the intentions or behaviors of an online vendor. There are almost certainly many potential sources of influence that promote or hinder online trust. However, the current article focuses on the HCI or interface design perspective in inducing online trust, that is, to use what consumers can see on an e-commerce interface to affect their feelings of trust toward the online merchant that the e-commerce interface represents.

[1]  Lawrence Ang,et al.  Influencing perceptions of trustworthiness in internet commerce: a rational choice framework , 2000 .

[2]  N. Luhmann Vertrauen : ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität , 1973 .

[3]  Susan Wiedenbeck,et al.  On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[4]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[5]  M. Helander,et al.  Affective design of E-commerce user interfaces: how to maximise perceived trustworthiness , 2001 .

[6]  David Gefen,et al.  Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers , 2002, Data Base.

[7]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ewald A. Kaluscha,et al.  Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[10]  Henry H. Emurian,et al.  An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  David C. Yen,et al.  Internet Integrated Customer Relationship Management a Key Success Factor for Companies in the E-Commerce Arena , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[13]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  Shiny happy people building trust?: photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust , 2003, CHI '03.

[14]  Heike Schaumburg,et al.  A picture says more than a thousand words: photographs as trust builders in e-commerce websites , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[16]  Andrea Basso,et al.  Interpersonal trust and common ground in electronically mediated communication , 2000, CSCW '00.