Assistive Devices for Classroom Listening

The listening problems experienced by people with hearing loss have been well-documented. Typical classrooms, where listening is so important, are especially noisy and reverberant environments. A n...

[1]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  The effects of hearing aids on speech discrimination in noise by normal-hearing listeners. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Carl C. Crandell,et al.  Classroom acoustics for hearing‐impaired children , 1992 .

[4]  N. P. Erber.  Auditory and audiovisual reception of words in low-frequency noise by children with normal hearing and by children with impaired hearing. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Evaluation and assessment of FM systems. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[6]  R J Sung,et al.  Performance of individual hearing aids utilizing microphone and induction coil input. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  Matkin Nd,et al.  Induction loop amp;ification systems: classroom performance. , 1970 .

[8]  R M Barr-Hamilton.  A theoretical approach to the loop induction system. , 1978, British journal of audiology.

[9]  Frederick S. Berg,et al.  Facilitating Classroom Listening: A Handbook for Teachers of Normal and Hard of Hearing Students , 1987 .

[10]  J. Blair.  Effects of Amplification, Speechreading, and Classroom Environments on Reception of Speech. , 1977 .

[11]  R J Sung,et al.  A comparative study of physical characteristics of hearing aids on microphone and telecoil inputs. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  R Leavitt,et al.  Speech degradation as measured by the Rapid Speech Transmission Index (RASTI). , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[13]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Some effects of FM-system coupling on hearing aid characteristics. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[14]  J. Pickett,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  J C Tannahill.  Performance characteristics for hearing aid microphone versus telephone and telephone/telecoil reception modes. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Frequency response characteristics of FM mini-loop auditory trainers. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Electroacoustic characteristics of personal FM systems. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[18]  F H Bess,et al.  Group Amplification in Schools for the Hearing Impaired , 1984, Ear and hearing.

[19]  Linda M. Thibodeau.  Electroacoustic Performance of Direct-Input Hearing Aids with FM Amplification Systems , 1990 .

[20]  C. Flexer,et al.  Children With Developmental Disabilities , 1990 .

[21]  M. Ross,et al.  Effect of three classroom listening conditions on speech intelligibility. , 1971, American annals of the deaf.

[22]  R. Leavitt.  Group Amplification Systems for Students with Hearing Impairment , 1991 .

[23]  William A. Worner.  An Inexpensive Group FM Amplification System for the Classroom. , 1988 .