Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.

The purpose of this mixed model design was to examine recognition performance differences when measuring speech recognition in multitalker babble on listeners with normal hearing (n = 36) and listeners with hearing loss (n = 72) utilizing stimulus of varying linguistic complexity (digits, words, and sentence materials). All listeners were administered two trials of two lists of each material in a descending speech-to-babble ratio. For each of the materials, recognition performances by the listeners with normal hearing were significantly better than the performances by the listeners with hearing loss. The mean separation between groups at the 50% point in signal-to-babble ratio on each of the three materials was approximately 8 dB. The 50% points for digits were obtained at a significantly lower signal-to-babble ratio than for sentences or words that were equivalent. There were no interlist differences between the two lists for the digits and words, but there was a significant disparity between QuickSIN lists for the listeners with hearing loss. A two-item questionnaire was used to obtain a subjective measurement of speech recognition, which showed moderate correlations with objective measures of speech recognition in noise using digits (r = .641), sentences (r = .572), and words (r = .673).

[1]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[2]  W A Dreschler,et al.  Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T L Wiley,et al.  Word recognition performance in various background competitors. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  Word recognition of digit triplets and monosyllabic words in multitalker babble by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[7]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Recognition of low-pass-filtered consonants in noise with normal and impaired high-frequency hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  T W Tillman,et al.  Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. , 1970, Archives of otolaryngology.

[10]  R. Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion , 1992 .

[11]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  Memory Changes in Normal Aging , 1994 .

[12]  T. Salthouse A Theory of Cognitive Aging , 1985 .

[13]  P. Rabbitt Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[14]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Mead C. Killion New Thinking on Hearing in Noise: A Generalized Articulation Index , 2002 .

[16]  R C Findlay,et al.  Auditory dysfunction accompanying noise-induced hearing loss. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Christopher A Burks,et al.  A comparison of word-recognition abilities assessed with digit pairs and digit triplets in multitalker babble. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[19]  R Carhart,et al.  An expanded test for speech discrimination utilizing CNC monosyllabic words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. SAM-TR-66-55. , 1966, [Technical report] SAM-TR. USAF School of Aerospace Medicine.

[20]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  The Use of Digit Triplets to Evaluate Word-Recognition Abilities in Multitalker Babble , 2004 .

[23]  Gerald A. Studebaker,et al.  The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report II , 1991 .

[24]  F N Martin,et al.  Seventh survey of audiometric practices in the United States. , 1998, Journal of american academy of audiology.

[25]  Lisa Lucks Mendel,et al.  Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment , 1997 .

[26]  Brian E Walden,et al.  Predicting success with hearing aids in everyday living. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  D. J. Finney Statistical Method in Biological Assay , 1966 .

[28]  A Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  John Fletcher,et al.  Speech Understanding and Aging , 1977 .

[30]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  L M Thibodeau Exploration of Factors Beyond Audibility That May Influence Speech Recognition , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[32]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[33]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[34]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  What can the pure‐tone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss? , 2000 .

[36]  Lynne Marshall Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment , 1999 .

[37]  Richard H Wilson,et al.  Auditory Test No . 6 in multi-talker babble : A preliminary report , 2002 .

[38]  R C Beattie,et al.  Word recognition functions for the CID W-22 test in multitalker noise for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1989, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[39]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[40]  D D Dirks,et al.  A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[41]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[43]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  G. Shone,et al.  Ageing and the auditory system , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[45]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone , 2004, International journal of audiology.