The PSM approach to transitions: Bridging the gap between abstract frameworks and tangible entities

Transition research investigates processes of fundamental change in societal subsystems, such as a transition to a low-emission mobility system. Much of transition research uses abstract frameworks to structure narratives. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms generating transitions is however required for purposefully influencing transitions (to sustainability). Such mechanisms comprise constellations of actors, technologies, institutions and their interactions leading to a specific type of phenomenon and refer to more confined social phenomena than transitions. This paper introduces the PSM (Phenomenon of interest, Specification and operationalization, Mechanism) approach to embed mechanisms describing particular dynamics of interest within the broader picture of an overall transition. The PSM approach uses three steps to bridge abstraction levels: 1) identify a phenomenon of interest in a specific phase of a transition and on or across levels of the multi-level perspective, 2) specify and operationalize the phenomenon of interest, and 3) identify mechanisms which are (partial) explanations of the phenomenon of interest. The PSM approach is considered useful to bridge levels of abstractions between which policy development must navigate, to empirically ground discussions around abstract frameworks and to transfer insights on relevant mechanisms between cases. An illustrative example from the mobility field is given.

[1]  Georg Holtz,et al.  Modelling transitions: An appraisal of experiences and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[2]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[3]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Specifying “regime” — A framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research , 2008 .

[4]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Institutional Change in the Automotive Industry Or how fuel cell technology is being institutionalised , 2004 .

[5]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework , 2010 .

[7]  Georg Holtz,et al.  The NeWater Management and Transition Framework — state and development process — , 2008 .

[8]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[9]  R. Mayntz.  Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena , 2004 .

[10]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management , 2004 .

[11]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  The economics of technical change , 1994 .

[12]  Malte Schwoon,et al.  Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles , 2006 .

[13]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[14]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Introduction: Habitual travel choice , 2003 .

[15]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment of mobility transitions: Simulating stakeholders' visions of and pathways to sustainable land-based mobility , 2008 .

[16]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change , 2011 .

[17]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[18]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change , 2011 .

[19]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[20]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The transition in Dutch water management , 2005 .

[21]  F. Geels.  Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[22]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[23]  J. Meadowcroft.  Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[24]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[25]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions and system innovations , 2005 .

[26]  Flaminio Squazzoni,et al.  A (computational) social science perspective on societal transitions , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[27]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[28]  J. Bergh,et al.  Demand-supply coevolution with multiple increasing returns: policy analysis for unlocking and system transitionsblocks , 2010 .

[29]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[30]  Gönenç Yücel,et al.  Analyzing Transition Dynamics: The Actor-Option Framework for Modelling Socio-Technical Systems , 2010 .

[31]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management Managing Change toward Adaptive Water Management through Social Learning , 2007 .

[32]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[34]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Energy and communities in transition: Towards a new research agenda on agency and civil society in sustainability transitions , 2010 .

[35]  Pieter van der Zaag,et al.  Adaptive and Integrated Water Management: Coping With Complexity and Uncertainty , 2008 .

[36]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for transition modelling , 2008 .

[37]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[38]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Managing the Transition to Sustainable Mobility , 2004 .

[39]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability , 2004 .

[40]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[41]  Floortje Alkemade,et al.  Initial infrastructure development strategies for the transition to sustainable mobility , 2010 .

[42]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[43]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[44]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Modelling Socio-Technical Transition Patterns and Pathways , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[45]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[46]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Interventions to Break and Create Consumer Habits , 2006 .

[47]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Infrastructure investment for a transition to hydrogen automobiles , 2010 .