Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of Bobath on stroke patients at different motor stages by comparing their treatment with orthopaedic treatment. Design: A single-blind study, with random assignment to Bobath or orthopaedic group. Setting: Physical therapy department of a medical centre. Subjects: Twenty-one patients with stroke with spasticity and 23 patients with stroke at relative recovery stages participated. Interventions: Twenty sessions of Bobath programme or orthopaedic treatment programme given in four weeks. Main outcome measures: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) for impairment and functional limitation level. Results: Participants with spasticity showed greater improvement in tone control (change score: 1.209±1.03 versus 0.089±0.67, p =0.006), MAS (change score: 7.64±4.03 versus 4.009±1.95, p =0.011), and SIS (change score: 7.309±6.24 versus 1.259±5.33, p=0.023) after 20 sessions of Bobath treatment than with orthopaedic treatment. Participants with relative recovery receiving Bobath treatment showed greater improvement in MAS (change score: 6.149±5.55 versus 2.779±9.89, p=0.007), BBS (change score: 19.189±15.94 versus 6.859±5.23, p=0.015), and SIS scores (change score: 8.509±3.41 versus 3.629±4.07, p =0.006) than those with orthopaedic treatment. Conclusion: Bobath or orthopaedic treatment paired with spontaneous recovery resulted in improvements in impairment and functional levels for patient with stroke. Patients benefit more from the Bobath treatment in MAS and SIS scores than from the orthopaedic treatment programme regardless of their motor recovery stages.

[1]  Sheila Lennon,et al.  Physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation: a survey , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[3]  B. Bobath.  Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment , 1978 .

[4]  B. Ford.  International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[5]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  M. Paci.  Physiotherapy based on the Bobath concept for adults with post-stroke hemiplegia: a review of effectiveness studies. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  A Ashburn,et al.  The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[8]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. , 1992, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[9]  B. Langhammer,et al.  Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  J. Carr,et al.  Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[11]  A. Ashburn,et al.  Review article : Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review , 1993 .

[12]  A. Shumway-cook,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[13]  Naoichi Chino,et al.  Functional Evaluation of Stroke Patients , 1996, Springer Japan.

[14]  Robert John Zagar,et al.  Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Dickstein,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[16]  Langhorne,et al.  Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke , 1997, BMJ.

[17]  S. Embretson,et al.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. , 1999, Stroke.

[18]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[19]  H. Hislop,et al.  Movement therapy in hemiplegia : a neurophysiological approach , 1970 .

[20]  D. Good,et al.  Comparison of Two Therapy Approaches in the Rehabilitation of the Pure Motor Hemiparetic Stroke Patient , 1995 .