Robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: complications and functional and oncologic outcomes during a 4-year median period of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the renal functional outcome, the oncologic safety, and the occurrence of complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for completely endophytic tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data of 45 patients with completely endophytic tumors, 116 patients with mesophytic, and 64 patients with exophytic masses who underwent RPN were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative, oncologic, and functional data were evaluated and analyzed with SPSS, version 18. RESULTS Demographic characteristics were similar among the groups. The median follow-up of the endophytic, the mesophytic, and the exophytic groups were 48, 43, and 38 months, respectively. Endophytic masses were more likely to be malignant and have a higher overall tumor complexity, estimated by the RENAL score (9 vs 8 vs 5.5; P <.01; P = .02). We did not detect any statistically significant differences among the groups regarding blood loss volume, transfusion rates, length of stay, and intraoperative and postoperative complications (P = .49, .25, .87, .42, and .20, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate percentage change on the first postoperative day (P = .02), but this significance was not observed after the first week. The patients in the endophytic group showed a tendency toward increased rates of positive surgical margins compared with the mesophytic and exophytic groups (P = .06). However, there were not any significant differences regarding the recurrence-free survival rates (P = .335) and the overall mortality rates (P = .570) according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis. CONCLUSION In experienced institutes, RPN for entirely intraparenchymal masses is a feasible procedure in terms of complication rates, functional and oncologic outcomes during an intermediate-term period of follow-up.

[1]  T. Kim,et al.  Factors Influencing the Operative Approach to Renal Tumors: Analyses According to RENAL Nephrometry Scores , 2014, Korean journal of urology.

[2]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[3]  P. Pierorazio,et al.  Trends in renal surgery: robotic technology is associated with increased use of partial nephrectomy. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[4]  Klaus Jeschke,et al.  Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. , 2012, European urology.

[5]  R. Uzzo,et al.  Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. , 2011, European urology.

[6]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes. , 2012, European urology.

[7]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Menon,et al.  Robotic ultrasound probe for tumor identification in robotic partial nephrectomy: Initial series and outcomes , 2013, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  C. Lohse,et al.  Renal nephrometry score is associated with urine leak after partial nephrectomy , 2011, BJU international.

[10]  Ralph V Clayman,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effect of tumor location. , 2006, Urology.

[11]  C. Sundaram,et al.  The role of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in the era of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. , 2013, Journal of endourology.

[12]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity , 2014, BJU international.

[13]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7. , 2011, Urology.

[14]  Paul Russo,et al.  Commentary on The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth , 2010 .

[15]  D. Canes,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for completely intraparenchymal tumors. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[16]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Predictive factors of complications after robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicentre study , 2013, BJU international.

[17]  D L McCullough,et al.  Intraoperative renal ultrasonography: a useful adjunct to partial nephrectomy. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[18]  A. Levey,et al.  A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  Georges-Pascal Haber,et al.  Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience , 2014, BJU international.

[20]  Robert G Uzzo,et al.  The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. , 2009, The Journal of urology.