Using grounded theory for studying business process management phenomena

To actually gain organizational value from investments in Information technology (IT) is a widely known problem that many businesses today struggle with. This paper presents an interpretative case study of three public fire rescue service organizations in Sweden. The aim of the study is to investigate what problematic issues that could be raised in achieving organizational value of IT in public organizations. The study indicates that the absence of strategies and IT evaluation methods create fragmented, uncoordinated IT-investment activities, which in turn creates a frustration at all levels of the organization. The public sector invests heavy in IT, seemingly with poor management control. The consequences will be misuse of resources and unnecessary high IT costs. We argue that the use of formal evaluation methods would help the situation, but that economic methods are not enough as the sole solution. A combination of the economic and the Interpretative IT Evaluation approach seems more promising in order to capture both efficiency and effectiveness aspects.

[1]  Edmond P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding “IS business value”: derivation of dimensions , 1999 .

[2]  Elizabeth Daniel,et al.  Benefits management : delivering value from IS & IT investments , 2005 .

[3]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information technology and economic performance , 2003, ACM Comput. Surv..

[4]  Donna M. Chovanec Doing interpretive research in a technocratic age: A clash of paradigms , 1996 .

[5]  Craig Standing,et al.  An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Tony Cornford,et al.  A critical approach to evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Vassilis Serafeimidis A review of research issues in evaluation of information systems , 2001 .

[8]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation , 1999 .

[9]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[10]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[11]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter , 2006 .

[12]  V. J. Symons,et al.  A review of information systems evaluation: content, context and process , 1991 .

[13]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[14]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  Towards the Formulation of a ‘ Best Practice ’ Framework for Benefits Realisation in IT Projects , 2003 .

[15]  R. Solow We’d better watch out , 1987 .

[16]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  Steven Jones,et al.  Understanding IS evaluation as a complex social process: a case study of a UK local authority , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  David Baccarini,et al.  Project Benefits Management in IT Projects–an Australian Perspective , 2004 .

[20]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems: what sort of science is it? , 2000 .

[21]  John Thorp The benefits realization approach to IT investments , 2001 .

[22]  Egon Berghout,et al.  The eleven years of European Conference on IT evaluation: Retrospectives and perspectives for possible future research , 2005 .

[23]  Theodore K. Apostolopoulos,et al.  Information technology investment evaluation: Investments in telecommunication infrastructure , 1997 .

[24]  Patricia M. Fandt,et al.  Management: Challenges for Tomorrow's Leaders , 2003 .